Literature DB >> 23635599

Effects of spatial-memory decay and dual-task interference on perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions in the absence of online visual feedback.

Kenneth C Cheng1, Jay Pratt, Brian E Maki.   

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions can be (and often are) guided by visuospatial information stored in working memory. To further our understanding, the present study examined the influence of memory-decay and concurrent cognitive-task performance on the speed, accuracy and effectiveness of these reactions by using liquid-crystal goggles to initiate occlusion of vision at various "recall-delay" times prior to perturbation-onset, in ten healthy young-adults. A small handhold was moved unpredictably to one of four locations 2s prior to vision-occlusion; reactions to recover balance by grasping the handhold were evoked by unpredictable antero-posterior platform-translation perturbations. Recall-delay time (0s/2s/5s/10s) was randomized, and subjects performed a spatial- or non-spatial-memory task during the delay-time in a subset of trials. Consistent with studies of volitional reach-to-grasp, recall-delay led to some reduction in endpoint accuracy; however, unlike those studies, the present results showed no evidence that recall-delay led to slowing of the arm movement. Both spatial and non-spatial cognitive tasks had similar effects (slowing of movement initiation and execution), suggesting these effects were related to generic attentional demands rather than competition for specific resources related to spatial working memory. Further work is needed to determine effects of age-related impairments in visuospatial memory and attentional capacity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635599     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  4 in total

1.  Examining the influence of mental stress on balance perturbation responses in older adults.

Authors:  Ruth Y Akinlosotu; Nesreen Alissa; Shari R Waldstein; Robert A Creath; George F Wittenberg; Kelly P Westlake
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 4.032

Review 2.  Time-interval for integration of stabilizing haptic and visual information in subjects balancing under static and dynamic conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06

3.  Promoting Generalized Learning in Balance Recovery Interventions.

Authors:  Sara A Harper; Anne Z Beethe; Christopher J Dakin; David A E Bolton
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  Do aging and dual-tasking impair the capacity to store and retrieve visuospatial information needed to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Jay Pratt; Brian E Maki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.