OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese women according to weight change and obesity class. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor of 20,950 obese women with a singleton, term live birth from 2002-2008. Risk for adverse outcomes was calculated by multiple logistic regression analysis for weight change categories (weight loss [<0 kg], low [0-4.9 kg], normal [5.0-9.0 kg], high weight gain [>9.0 kg]) in each obesity class (I 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2), II 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2), and III ≥40 kg/m(2)) and by predicted probabilities with weight change as a continuous variable. RESULTS: Weight loss was associated with decreased cesareans for class I women (nulliparas odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.42; multiparas OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.83) and increased small for gestational age infants (class I OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; class II OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.2; class III OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). High weight gain was associated with increased large for gestational age infants (class I OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.9-2.9; class II OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1; class III OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1). As weight change increased, the predicted probability for cesareans and large for gestational age infants increased. The predicted probability of low birthweight never exceeded 4% for all obesity classes, but small for gestational age infants increased with decreased weight change. The lowest average predicted probability of adverse outcomes (cesarean, postpartum hemorrhage, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, neonatal care unit admission) occurred when women (class I, II, III) lost weight. CONCLUSION: Optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes appear to occur when weight gain is less than current Institute of Medicine recommendations for obese women. Further study of long-term outcomes is needed with respect to gestational weight changes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in obesewomen according to weight change and obesity class. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor of 20,950 obesewomen with a singleton, term live birth from 2002-2008. Risk for adverse outcomes was calculated by multiple logistic regression analysis for weight change categories (weight loss [<0 kg], low [0-4.9 kg], normal [5.0-9.0 kg], high weight gain [>9.0 kg]) in each obesity class (I 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2), II 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2), and III ≥40 kg/m(2)) and by predicted probabilities with weight change as a continuous variable. RESULTS:Weight loss was associated with decreased cesareans for class I women (nulliparas odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.42; multiparas OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.83) and increased small for gestational age infants (class I OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; class II OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.2; class III OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). High weight gain was associated with increased large for gestational age infants (class I OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.9-2.9; class II OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1; class III OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1). As weight change increased, the predicted probability for cesareans and large for gestational age infants increased. The predicted probability of low birthweight never exceeded 4% for all obesity classes, but small for gestational age infants increased with decreased weight change. The lowest average predicted probability of adverse outcomes (cesarean, postpartum hemorrhage, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, neonatal care unit admission) occurred when women (class I, II, III) lost weight. CONCLUSION: Optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes appear to occur when weight gain is less than current Institute of Medicine recommendations for obesewomen. Further study of long-term outcomes is needed with respect to gestational weight changes.
Authors: Kimberly K Vesco; Patricia M Dietz; Joanne Rizzo; Victor J Stevens; Nancy A Perrin; Donald J Bachman; William M Callaghan; F Carol Bruce; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Amy A Flick; Kathleen F Brookfield; Lesley de la Torre; Carmen Maria Tudela; Lunthita Duthely; Víctor Hugo González-Quintero Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ellen A Nohr; Michael Vaeth; Jennifer L Baker; Thorkild Ia Sørensen; Jorn Olsen; Kathleen M Rasmussen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Emily Oken; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Alison E Field; A Lindsay Frazier; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Anne Marie Darling; Martha M Werler; David E Cantonwine; Wafaie W Fawzi; Thomas F McElrath Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Kathleen M Antony; Jun Ma; Kristen B Mitchell; Diana A Racusin; James Versalovic; Kjersti Aagaard Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Sarah J Pugh; Timothy L Lash; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Katherine P Himes; Sara M Parisi; Barbara Abrams Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Michelle A Kominiarek; George Saade; Lisa Mele; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Line Rode; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nicole E Marshall; Barbara Abrams; Linda A Barbour; Patrick Catalano; Parul Christian; Jacob E Friedman; William W Hay; Teri L Hernandez; Nancy F Krebs; Emily Oken; Jonathan Q Purnell; James M Roberts; Hora Soltani; Jacqueline Wallace; Kent L Thornburg Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-12-27 Impact factor: 10.693