| Literature DB >> 23634874 |
Laura Melchionda1, Mingyan Fang, Hairong Wang, Valeria Fugnanesi, Michela Morbin, Xuanzhu Liu, Wenyan Li, Isabella Ceccherini, Laura Farina, Mario Savoiardo, Pio D'Adamo, Jianguo Zhang, Alfredo Costa, Sabrina Ravaglia, Daniele Ghezzi, Massimo Zeviani.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We studied a family including two half-siblings, sharing the same mother, affected by slowly progressive, adult-onset neurological syndromes. In spite of the diversity of the clinical features, characterized by a mild movement disorder with cognitive impairment in the elder patient, and severe motor-neuron disease (MND) in her half-brother, the brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) features were compatible with adult-onset Alexander's disease (AOAD), suggesting different expression of the same, genetically determined, condition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23634874 PMCID: PMC3654953 DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-66
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Figure 1Pedigree and radiological features of the patients. A: Pedigree of the family. Black symbols indicate affected patients 1 and 2 (Pt1, Pt2). Genotypes of each tested individual are indicated under the corresponding symbols (GFAP G: wt; GFAP A: mutant; HDAC6 C: wt; HDAC6 T: mutant). I-3 died of colon cancer at 62 years of age; I-1died of unknown causes when he was over 80; II-3 died of a cerebral stroke at 60 years of age. B: Brain MRI findings of Pt1 (a-f) and Pt2 (g). Atrophy of the medulla is present, with signal abnormalities of the pyramidal tract and medial lemniscus (a, arrows). In the cerebellum, the hylum of the dentate nucleus is bilaterally hyperintense (a, thick arrows). At midbrain level (b,c), substantia nigra and medial lemniscus are hyperintense (b, arrows); a sub-pial rim of high signal intensity is present in the FLAIR image (c). Symmetrical signal abnormalities involve the pallida, particularly at the interface with the posterior limb of the internal capsule (d, arrows). Hyperintensitiy is present in the periventricular white matter, pre- and post-central gyri (e, arrows on the right) and subcortical frontobasal areas (f, arrows). The typical tadpole appearance of the brainstem and cervical spinal cord is seen in the midline sagittal section of Pt2 (g).
Clinical and instrumental assessments
| Current age | 68 | 60 |
| Age at onset | 55 | 46 |
| Disease duration at the time of examinations, years | 13 | 14 |
| Cognitive: MMSE score | 16/30 | 30/30 |
| EMG | 0 | Mild motor axonal neuropathy (1) |
| MEPs Bulbar/UL/LL | N.A./0/0 | 1/1/3 |
| SEPs UL/LL | 1/1 | 0/1 |
| BAEPs | NA | NA |
| VEPs | 0 | 0 |
| Autonomic testing | 0 | 0 |
| Dysarthria/dysphagia | 2 | 2 |
| Gait abnormalities | 1 | 3 |
| Spasticity | 0 | 3 |
| Axial Ataxia | 1 | 0 |
| Limb dysmetria | 2 | 0 |
| Limb weakness | 0 | 2 |
| Muscle wasting | 0 | 1 |
| Sphincter function | 2 | 0 |
* For neurophysiological assessments, values are graded as 0 (normal), 1 (abnormality not exceeding 25% of upper/lower normal ranges), 2 (between 25 and 50%), and 3 (beyond 50%).
** For clinical dysfunctions, abnormalities are graded as 0 (normal), 1 (only objective signs), 2 (mild dysfunction, not interfering with activities), 3 (severe dysfunction interfering with walking, feeding, or social interactions).
MMSE: mini–mental state examination; EMG: Electromyography; MEPs: Motor evoked potentials; SEPs: Sensory evoked potentials; UL/LL: upper/lower limbs; BAEPs: Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials; VEPs: visual evoked potentials.
Figure 2Characterization of the GFAP c.1289G>A/p.R430H mutation. A: Schematic representation of the exonic structure of different GFAP isoforms. Dotted lines indicate the termination codons. The arrows indicate the position of the c.1289G>A variant (Note that in GFAP-κ the c.1289G>A mutation is part of the 3′-UTR). B: Electropherograms of GFAP exon 7A region containing c.1289G>A variant, in patients 1 and 2 (Pt1, Pt2) and in their mother (I-2). C: The histogram displays the percentages of cells transfected with GFP-GFAP-ϵwt (green bars) or GFP-GFAP-ϵR430H (purple bars), classified in filamentous pattern (F), cytoplasmic aggregates on a filamentous pattern (F + A), cytoplasmic aggregates with no filamentous pattern (A). Scale bars represent 15 μm. A total of 324 cells for GFP-GFAP-ϵwt and 285 for GFP-GFAP-ϵR430H, from 3 independent experiments, were blindly analyzed by two different operators. ANOVA test for interaction p = 0.001.
Figure 3Characterization of the HDAC6 c.2566C>T/p.P856S variant. A: Electropherograms of HDAC6 exon 25 region containing the c.2566C>T variant, in patients 1 and 2 (Pt1, Pt2) and their mother (I-2). B: Levels of HDAC6 transcript, normalized to that of the endogenous GAPDH cDNA, in controls (Ct; mean of five subjects) and patients 1 and 2 (Pt1, Pt2), obtained from 3 independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-tests showed no significant differences: Pt2 vs. Ct p = 0.811; Pt2 vs. Pt1 p = 0.813; Pt1 vs. Ct p = 0.896. C: Exemplifying Western-blot analysis of fibroblast lysates from control subjects (Ct1, Ct2) and patients 1 and 2 (Pt1, Pt2), using antibodies against acetylated α-tubulin (upper panel), α-tubulin (middle panel) and α-GAPDH, as loading control (lower panel). The graph represents the ratio acetylated α-tubulin/α-tubulin obtained by densitometric analysis from 3 independent experiments: 100% corresponds to the mean value of four control subjects. Two-tailed Student’s t-test Pt2 vs Ct p = 0.002, Pt1 vs Ct p = 0.33. D: Immunocytochemistry on fibroblasts from a control subject (Ct) and patients 1 and 2 (Pt1, Pt2), using antibodies against α-tubulin and acetylated α-tubulin. Scale bars are reported on the right for each row. E: Percentages of multilobated nuclei in control, Patient1 and Patient2. A total of 15 digital images (at least 600 cells for each patient) representative of the whole sections were collected and analyzed for each sample; the arrow indicates a typical multilobated nucleus. Two-tailed Student’s t-test between Control vs. Pt1 showed no significant differences (p = 0.4970); Pt2 vs. Control p = 0.000099; Pt2 vs. Pt1 p = 0.000018 (both highly significant).