OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of a serologic microagglutination test (MAT) and a PCR assay on urine and blood for the diagnosis of leptospirosis in dogs with acute kidney injury (AKI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Animals-76 dogs with AKI in a referral hospital (2008 to 2009). PROCEDURES: Dogs' leptospirosis status was defined with a paired serologic MAT against a panel of 11 Leptospira serovars as leptospirosis-associated (n = 30) or nonleptospirosis-associated AKI (12). In 34 dogs, convalescent serologic testing was not possible, and leptospirosis status was classified as undetermined. The diagnostic value of the MAT single acute or convalescent blood sample was determined in dogs in which leptospirosis status could be classified. The diagnostic value of a commercially available genus-specific PCR assay was evaluated by use of 36 blood samples and 20 urine samples. RESULTS: Serologic acute testing of an acute blood sample had a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 76% to 100%), a sensitivity of 50% (33% to 67%), and an accuracy of 64% (49% to 77%). Serologic testing of a convalescent blood sample had a specificity of 92% (65% to 99%), a sensitivity of 100% (87% to 100%), and an accuracy of 98% (88% to 100%). Results of the Leptospira PCR assay were negative for all samples from dogs for which leptospirosis status could be classified. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Serologic MAT results were highly accurate for diagnosis of leptospirosis in dogs, despite a low sensitivity for early diagnosis. In this referral setting of dogs pretreated with antimicrobials, testing of blood and urine samples with a commercially available genus-specific PCR assay did not improve early diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of a serologic microagglutination test (MAT) and a PCR assay on urine and blood for the diagnosis of leptospirosis in dogs with acute kidney injury (AKI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Animals-76 dogs with AKI in a referral hospital (2008 to 2009). PROCEDURES: Dogs' leptospirosis status was defined with a paired serologic MAT against a panel of 11 Leptospira serovars as leptospirosis-associated (n = 30) or nonleptospirosis-associated AKI (12). In 34 dogs, convalescent serologic testing was not possible, and leptospirosis status was classified as undetermined. The diagnostic value of the MAT single acute or convalescent blood sample was determined in dogs in which leptospirosis status could be classified. The diagnostic value of a commercially available genus-specific PCR assay was evaluated by use of 36 blood samples and 20 urine samples. RESULTS: Serologic acute testing of an acute blood sample had a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 76% to 100%), a sensitivity of 50% (33% to 67%), and an accuracy of 64% (49% to 77%). Serologic testing of a convalescent blood sample had a specificity of 92% (65% to 99%), a sensitivity of 100% (87% to 100%), and an accuracy of 98% (88% to 100%). Results of the Leptospira PCR assay were negative for all samples from dogs for which leptospirosis status could be classified. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Serologic MAT results were highly accurate for diagnosis of leptospirosis in dogs, despite a low sensitivity for early diagnosis. In this referral setting of dogs pretreated with antimicrobials, testing of blood and urine samples with a commercially available genus-specific PCR assay did not improve early diagnosis.
Authors: A Barthélemy; M Magnin; C Pouzot-Nevoret; J-M Bonnet-Garin; M Hugonnard; I Goy-Thollot Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Andrea M Spiri; Sabrina Rodriguez-Campos; José M Matos; Tony M Glaus; Barbara Riond; Claudia E Reusch; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Barbara Willi Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Katie E McCallum; Fernando Constantino-Casas; John M Cullen; James H Warland; Harry Swales; Niamh Linghley; Andre J Kortum; Alex J Sterritt; Tristan Cogan; Penny J Watson Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Carla A Maissen-Villiger; Ariane Schweighauser; H Anette van Dorland; Claudine Morel; Rupert M Bruckmaier; Andreas Zurbriggen; Thierry Francey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bruno Alonso Miotto; Barbara Furlan Tozzi; Manoela de Souza Penteado; Aline Gil Alves Guilloux; Luisa Zanolli Moreno; Marcos Bryan Heinemann; Andrea Micke Moreno; Walter Lilenbaum; Mitika Kuribayashi Hagiwara Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.741