Literature DB >> 23634565

Ultrasonographic modification of Cormack Lehane classification for pre-anesthetic airway assessment.

Deepak Gupta1, Arvind Srirajakalidindi, Bryant Ittiara, Leigh Apple, Gokul Toshniwal, Halim Haber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major drawback of Cormack Lehane classification for airway assessment is its dependence on invasive direct laryngoscopy and hence it is inapplicable for pre-anesthetic assessment of airway in patients with no prior history of tracheal intubation. STUDY
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to compare and correlate the ultrasound view of the airway and the Cormack Lehane classification of the direct laryngoscopy. METHODS/STUDY PROCEDURES: The present study was conducted on patients scheduled for elective surgery and requiring general anesthesia with direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. In the pre-operative holding area, the following measurements were obtained with the oblique-transverse ultrasound view of the airway: (a) the distance from the epiglottis to the midpoint of the distance between the vocal folds, (b) the depth of the pre-epiglottic space, and (c) the total time taken by the operator to achieve the final ultrasonic image. The data was then compared with the Cormack Lehane classification during direct laryngoscopy in the operating room. Subsequently based on the correlation data, the ultrasonographic modification of Cormack-Lehane Classification was developed.
RESULTS: It was observed that there was a correlation of the distance between the epiglottis and the vocal cords (E-VC) with the Cormack Lehane Grading; correlation was strong negative with regression coefficient of -0.966 (95% CI -1.431 to -0.501; p = 0.0001). Subsequently, the correlation of the pre-epiglottis space (Pre-E) with the Cormack Lehane Grading was strong in positive direction with regression coefficient of0.595 (95% CI 0.261 to 0.929; p = 0.0008). Finally the ratio of Pre-E and E-VC distances with the Cormack Lehane Grading had the strongest positive correlation with regression coefficient of 0.495 (95% CI 0.319 to 0.671; p < 0.0001). Based on these statistical calculations and after rearranging the data, we found that prediction of Cormack Lehane (CL) grades can be adequately (67%-68% sensitivity) made by the ratio of Pre-E and E-VC distances (Pre-E/E-VC) {0 < [Pre-E/E-VC] < 1 approximately CL grade 1; 1 < [Pre-E/E-VC] < 2 approximately CL grade 2; and 2 < [Pre-E/E-VC] < 3 approximately CL grade 3}. The average time taken to complete the ultrasound examination of airway in the preoperative area was 31.7 +/- 12.4 seconds.
CONCLUSION: The non-invasive ultrasonographic modification of invasive Cormack Lehane classification for pre-anesthetic airway assessment can supplement the presently available noninvasive modalities of pre-anesthetic airway assessment including the Mallampati Classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23634565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0544-0440


  14 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for Anesthesiologists: an Overview.

Authors:  Linda Li; R Jason Yong; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-03-21

Review 2.  Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment.

Authors:  Justin S Fulkerson; Heather M Moore; Tristan S Anderson; Robert F Lowe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Role of anterior neck soft tissue quantifications by ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Jinhong Wu; Jing Dong; Yingchun Ding; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  Point-of-care ultrasound in the airway assessment: A correlation of ultrasonography-guided parameters to the Cormack-Lehane Classification.

Authors:  Shelly Rana; Versha Verma; Shyam Bhandari; Shalini Sharma; Vishal Koundal; Sudarshan Kumar Chaudhary
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

5.  A feasibility study to assess vallecula and pyriform sinus using protocol-based ultrasonic evaluation of floor of mouth and upper airway.

Authors:  Kulvinder Singh; Saru Singh; Ruchi Gupta; Chiranjeev Gathwal; Pranav Bansal; Manjeet Singh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Ultrasound for diagnosing new difficult laryngoscopy indicator: a prospective, self-controlled, assessor blinded, observational study.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yan-Kun Feng; Liu Hong; Wan-Li Xie; Shi-Qiang Chen; Ping Yin; Qing-Ping Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Comparative Study of Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters for Defining a Difficult Airway in Patients with Obesity.

Authors:  Ed Carlos Rey Moura; Andrey Salgado Moraes Filho; Eduardo José Silva Gomes de Oliveira; Thyago Trisotto Freire; Plínio da Cunha Leal; Lyvia Maria Rodrigues de Sousa Gomes; Elizabeth Teixeira Noguera Servin; Caio Márcio Barros de Oliveira
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Ultrasonography indicators for predicting difficult intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mehran Sotoodehnia; Hosein Rafiemanesh; Hadi Mirfazaelian; Arash Safaie; Alireza Baratloo
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-03

9.  Ultrasonography - A viable tool for airway assessment.

Authors:  Preethi B Reddy; Pankaj Punetha; Kolli S Chalam
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-11

10.  Usefulness of Ultrasound View of Larynx in Pre-Anesthetic Airway Assessment: A Comparison With Cormack-Lehane Classification During Direct Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Sussan Soltani Mohammadi; Alireza Saliminia; Nasim Nejatifard; Roxana Azma
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.