Literature DB >> 23634091

1-(2-Methyl-5-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)acetone.

Sammer Yousuf1, Khalid M Khan, Frazana Naz, Shahanaz Perveen, Ghulam A Miana.   

Abstract

In the mol-ecule of the title compound, C7H9N3O3, the nitro and carbonyl groups are tilted with respect to the imidazole ring by 9.16 (6) and 65.47 (7)°, respectively. Neighbouring chains are linked via C-H⋯N and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds forming two-dimensional slab-like networks lying parallel to (01-1).

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23634091      PMCID: PMC3629604          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813006569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the anti­biotic properties of metronidazole and mecnidazole, see: Lin et al. (2012 ▶); Almirall et al. (2011 ▶); Zhang et al. (2011 ▶). For the crystal structure of related imidazoles, see: Yousuf et al. (2012 ▶); Zeb et al. (2012 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H9N3O3 M = 183.17 Monoclinic, a = 4.7548 (4) Å b = 12.3971 (9) Å c = 14.8580 (11) Å β = 97.350 (2)° V = 868.62 (12) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 273 K 0.52 × 0.33 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.944, T max = 0.974 5030 measured reflections 1614 independent reflections 1328 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.019

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.122 S = 1.06 1614 reflections 120 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL, PARST (Nardelli, 1995 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813006569/rz5048sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813006569/rz5048Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813006569/rz5048Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H9N3O3F(000) = 384
Mr = 183.17Dx = 1.401 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1790 reflections
a = 4.7548 (4) Åθ = 2.8–26.7°
b = 12.3971 (9) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 14.8580 (11) ÅT = 273 K
β = 97.350 (2)°Block, colorless
V = 868.62 (12) Å30.52 × 0.33 × 0.24 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1614 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1328 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.019
ω scanθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.944, Tmax = 0.974k = −14→15
5030 measured reflectionsl = −14→17
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.122H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0591P)2 + 0.2124P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1614 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
120 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.15 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1−0.1621 (4)0.29596 (12)0.33611 (13)0.0887 (5)
O20.1562 (3)0.37418 (11)0.26792 (12)0.0791 (5)
O3−0.2465 (3)0.53369 (11)0.15962 (9)0.0622 (4)
N1−0.0008 (3)0.57463 (11)0.33181 (9)0.0424 (4)
N2−0.2805 (3)0.59824 (13)0.43940 (10)0.0574 (4)
N3−0.0337 (3)0.37691 (12)0.31638 (12)0.0589 (4)
C1−0.1098 (3)0.47575 (13)0.35252 (12)0.0464 (4)
C2−0.2784 (4)0.49243 (16)0.41793 (12)0.0554 (5)
H2B−0.37810.43890.44420.067*
C3−0.1137 (4)0.64611 (14)0.38648 (11)0.0485 (4)
C4−0.0467 (5)0.76284 (16)0.38973 (15)0.0728 (6)
H4A−0.12140.79510.44040.109*
H4B−0.13050.79650.33460.109*
H4C0.15520.77250.39630.109*
C50.1509 (3)0.60187 (13)0.25566 (11)0.0444 (4)
H5A0.32400.55980.25970.053*
H5B0.20340.67750.25950.053*
C6−0.0235 (3)0.58087 (13)0.16507 (12)0.0451 (4)
C70.1011 (4)0.62131 (17)0.08469 (13)0.0653 (5)
H7A−0.02700.60690.03070.098*
H7B0.27830.58550.08100.098*
H7C0.13260.69760.09050.098*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.1009 (12)0.0431 (8)0.1246 (15)−0.0117 (8)0.0248 (10)0.0121 (8)
O20.0790 (10)0.0538 (9)0.1115 (13)0.0122 (7)0.0387 (9)−0.0036 (8)
O30.0539 (8)0.0678 (9)0.0641 (9)−0.0109 (6)0.0049 (6)−0.0016 (6)
N10.0423 (7)0.0430 (8)0.0437 (8)−0.0021 (6)0.0123 (6)0.0018 (6)
N20.0622 (9)0.0651 (10)0.0487 (9)−0.0007 (7)0.0216 (7)0.0031 (7)
N30.0590 (9)0.0430 (9)0.0751 (11)0.0029 (7)0.0098 (8)0.0065 (7)
C10.0465 (9)0.0426 (9)0.0509 (10)−0.0010 (7)0.0098 (7)0.0075 (7)
C20.0541 (10)0.0610 (12)0.0530 (11)−0.0045 (9)0.0138 (8)0.0145 (9)
C30.0529 (9)0.0508 (10)0.0432 (9)−0.0007 (8)0.0112 (8)−0.0011 (7)
C40.0993 (16)0.0555 (12)0.0684 (14)−0.0068 (11)0.0296 (12)−0.0125 (10)
C50.0436 (8)0.0444 (9)0.0479 (9)−0.0045 (7)0.0159 (7)0.0003 (7)
C60.0457 (9)0.0395 (9)0.0518 (10)0.0047 (7)0.0124 (7)−0.0012 (7)
C70.0693 (12)0.0784 (14)0.0502 (11)−0.0027 (10)0.0151 (9)0.0038 (10)
O1—N31.230 (2)C3—C41.481 (3)
O2—N31.225 (2)C4—H4A0.9600
O3—C61.205 (2)C4—H4B0.9600
N1—C31.358 (2)C4—H4C0.9600
N1—C11.381 (2)C5—C61.510 (2)
N1—C51.457 (2)C5—H5A0.9700
N2—C31.326 (2)C5—H5B0.9700
N2—C21.350 (3)C6—C71.486 (3)
N3—C11.404 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
C1—C21.352 (2)C7—H7B0.9600
C2—H2B0.9300C7—H7C0.9600
C3—N1—C1104.93 (14)C3—C4—H4C109.5
C3—N1—C5125.87 (14)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
C1—N1—C5128.02 (14)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
C3—N2—C2105.74 (15)N1—C5—C6112.47 (13)
O2—N3—O1122.92 (17)N1—C5—H5A109.1
O2—N3—C1119.63 (15)C6—C5—H5A109.1
O1—N3—C1117.45 (17)N1—C5—H5B109.1
C2—C1—N1107.35 (15)C6—C5—H5B109.1
C2—C1—N3127.87 (16)H5A—C5—H5B107.8
N1—C1—N3124.56 (15)O3—C6—C7123.21 (16)
N2—C2—C1109.97 (15)O3—C6—C5121.44 (15)
N2—C2—H2B125.0C7—C6—C5115.35 (14)
C1—C2—H2B125.0C6—C7—H7A109.5
N2—C3—N1112.01 (16)C6—C7—H7B109.5
N2—C3—C4124.07 (16)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C3—C4123.86 (16)C6—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—H4A109.5H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—H4B109.5H7B—C7—H7C109.5
H4A—C4—H4B109.5
C3—N1—C1—C2−0.39 (18)C2—N2—C3—N1−0.6 (2)
C5—N1—C1—C2−168.41 (15)C2—N2—C3—C4−177.73 (19)
C3—N1—C1—N3−175.31 (16)C1—N1—C3—N20.60 (18)
C5—N1—C1—N316.7 (3)C5—N1—C3—N2168.96 (14)
O2—N3—C1—C2−168.38 (18)C1—N1—C3—C4177.77 (18)
O1—N3—C1—C211.0 (3)C5—N1—C3—C4−13.9 (3)
O2—N3—C1—N15.5 (3)C3—N1—C5—C6−106.10 (18)
O1—N3—C1—N1−175.14 (16)C1—N1—C5—C659.6 (2)
C3—N2—C2—C10.3 (2)N1—C5—C6—O3−9.0 (2)
N1—C1—C2—N20.1 (2)N1—C5—C6—C7171.59 (15)
N3—C1—C2—N2174.76 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2B···N2i0.932.563.361 (2)144
C5—H5B···O2ii0.972.573.527 (2)167
C7—H7B···O3iii0.962.493.340 (2)147
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2B⋯N2i 0.932.563.361 (2)144
C5—H5B⋯O2ii 0.972.573.527 (2)167
C7—H7B⋯O3iii 0.962.493.340 (2)147

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  7 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Determination of five nitroimidazole residues in artificial porcine muscle tissue samples by capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Yingyun Lin; Yan Su; Xiulin Liao; Na Yang; Xiupei Yang; Martin M F Choi
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III (FabH) as novel antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Hong-Jia Zhang; Di-Di Zhu; Zi-Lin Li; Juan Sun; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Mebendazole compared with secnidazole in the treatment of adult giardiasis: a randomised, no-inferiority, open clinical trial.

Authors:  Pedro Almirall; Angel A Escobedo; Idalia Ayala; Maydel Alfonso; Yohana Salazar; Roberto Cañete; Sergio Cimerman; Martha Galloso; Ilmaems Olivero; Maytee Robaina; Karen Tornés
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-11-20

5.  2-(2-Methyl-5-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)ethyl 2-bromo-benzoate.

Authors:  Aurang Zeb; Sammer Yousuf; Fatima Z Basha
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-03-28

6.  2-(2-Methyl-5-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)ethyl methane-sulfonate.

Authors:  Sammer Yousuf; Aurang Zeb; Farhana Batool; Fatima Z Basha
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-08-25

7.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  1-(2-Methyl-5-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propan-2-yl acetate.

Authors:  Hafiz Abdullah Shahid; Ejaz Hussain; Sajid Jahangir; Sammer Yousuf
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.