Literature DB >> 2363406

Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.

J Mermigos1, C A Full, G Andreasen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the orthopedic effects of reverse headgear therapy in children with skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data based on pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of seven boys and five girls, ages 4 through 14 years, were used. Comparison of the pretreatment and posttreatment cephalograms revealed a significant (p less than 0.05) increase in the SNA angle that indicated the maxilla was positioned farther forward after reverse headgear therapy. Both the maxillary and the mandibular effective lengths increased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment, as did anterior and posterior total face height. These linear increases are most likely a reflection of growth rather than a direct result of the therapy. There was no significant change in the anteroposterior position of the mandible, although there was a tendency for the mandibular plane angle and the gonial angle to decrease. The results of this study indicate that maxillary protraction with a reverse headgear should be considered an alternative to orthognathic surgery in the treatment of children and adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion characterized by maxillary retrognathism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2363406     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70031-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study.

Authors:  Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli; Bahadir Kan; Ferda Tasar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effects of chincup or facemask therapies on the orofacial airway and hyoid position in Class III subjects.

Authors:  Mehmet Akin; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Chousein Chousein; Zafer Sari
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Keun-Woo Kim; Il-Hyung Yang; Jin-Young Choi; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].

Authors:  Hui Shi; Hong-Shan Ge; Lu-Yi Chen; Zhi-Hua Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

7.  Correlation between skeletal changes by maxillary protraction and upper airway dimensions.

Authors:  Ji-Won Lee; Ki-Ho Park; Seong-Hun Kim; Young-Guk Park; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction.

Authors:  Nazan Küçükkeleş; Sirin Nevzatoğlu; Tamer Koldaş
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.

Authors:  Koray Halicioglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Ismail Ceylan; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of skeletal Class III treatment.

Authors:  Natalia Tejedor; Conchita Martín; José Antonio Alarcón; María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud; Juan Carlos Palma-Fernández
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.