BACKGROUND: The authors conducted an analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to understand the association between diabetes and tooth loss in the United States. METHODS: The authors analyzed the oral examination and self-reported diabetes data obtained from the NHANES 2003-2004 cycle and included 2,508 participants representing a civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population 50 years and older. The authors calculated the prevalence of edentulism and the number of missing teeth among dentate people, and they used multiple regression analyses to assess the association between diabetes and tooth loss. RESULTS: The prevalence of edentulism was 28 percent and 14 percent among people with and without diabetes, respectively. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that people with diabetes were more likely to be edentulous than were those without diabetes (adjusted odds ratio = 2.25; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.19-4.21). Among dentate adults, those with diabetes had a higher number of missing teeth than did adults without diabetes (mean [standard error {SE}] = 9.8 [0.67]), mean [SE] = 6.7 [0.29]); P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: These study results revealed that adults with diabetes are at higher risk of experiencing tooth loss and edentulism than are adults without diabetes. One of every five cases of edentulism in the United States is linked to diabetes. Practical Implications. Although the association between diabetes and periodontal disease is well established, health care professionals also need to recognize the risk of tooth loss and its effect on quality of life among people with diabetes.
BACKGROUND: The authors conducted an analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to understand the association between diabetes and tooth loss in the United States. METHODS: The authors analyzed the oral examination and self-reported diabetes data obtained from the NHANES 2003-2004 cycle and included 2,508 participants representing a civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population 50 years and older. The authors calculated the prevalence of edentulism and the number of missing teeth among dentate people, and they used multiple regression analyses to assess the association between diabetes and tooth loss. RESULTS: The prevalence of edentulism was 28 percent and 14 percent among people with and without diabetes, respectively. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that people with diabetes were more likely to be edentulous than were those without diabetes (adjusted odds ratio = 2.25; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.19-4.21). Among dentate adults, those with diabetes had a higher number of missing teeth than did adults without diabetes (mean [standard error {SE}] = 9.8 [0.67]), mean [SE] = 6.7 [0.29]); P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: These study results revealed that adults with diabetes are at higher risk of experiencing tooth loss and edentulism than are adults without diabetes. One of every five cases of edentulism in the United States is linked to diabetes. Practical Implications. Although the association between diabetes and periodontal disease is well established, health care professionals also need to recognize the risk of tooth loss and its effect on quality of life among people with diabetes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES); edentulism; tooth loss
Authors: Mary E Northridge; Chenchen Yu; Bibhas Chakraborty; Ariel Port Greenblatt; Janet Mark; Cynthia Golembeski; Bin Cheng; Carol Kunzel; Sara S Metcalf; Stephen E Marshall; Ira B Lamster Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marie D Jena; Peter W Marcello; Patricia L Roberts; Thomas E Read; David J Schoetz; Jason F Hall; Todd Francone; Rocco Ricciardi Journal: Clin Colon Rectal Surg Date: 2016-09
Authors: Stephen Marshall; Eric W Schrimshaw; Sara S Metcalf; Ariel Port Greenblatt; Leydis De La Cruz; Carol Kunzel; Mary E Northridge Journal: J Calif Dent Assoc Date: 2015-07
Authors: Faheema Kimmie-Dhansay; Carla Cruvinel Pontes; Usuf M E Chikte; Albert Chinhenzva; Rajiv T Erasmus; Andre Pascal Kengne; Tandi E Matsha Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 3.390