Literature DB >> 23633441

Outcome of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis of SEER data over 3 decades.

Mya S Thein1, William B Ershler, Ahmedin Jemal, Jerome W Yates, Maria R Baer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the common form of acute leukemia in adults, accounting for over 80% of all acute leukemias in individuals aged >18 years. Overall 5-year survival remains poor in older AML patients; it is <5% in patients aged >65 years. In this study, the authors examined whether survival has improved for subsets of geriatric AML patients over 3 successive decades.
METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data were used to determine trends in relative survival by age among 19,000 patients with AML over 3 successive decades (1977-1986, 1987-1996, and 1997-2006). Relative survival rates (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as measures of survival.
RESULTS: Overall, the RRs increased for each successive decade (1977-1986, 1987-1996, and 1997-2006) in patients ages 65 to 74 years, with improvements in 12-month survival from 20%, to 25%, to 30%, respectively. Findings were similar for 24-month, 36-month, 48-month, and 60-month survival. However, survival rates did not improve in patients aged ≥75 years. The oldest old patients (aged ≥85 years) had the lowest survival rates, with no apparent improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a large data set demonstrated that, although overall survival remained unsatisfactory among older patients, it improved in the younger old (ages 65-74 years). Survival of older old AML patients has not been favorably impacted by available AML therapies or supportive care, and intervention in this age group is best undertaken on a clinical trial.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data; acute myeloid leukemia; age; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23633441      PMCID: PMC3821042          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  Comorbidity considerations in geriatric oncology research.

Authors:  J W Yates
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Period analysis for 'up-to-date' cancer survival data: theory, empirical evaluation, computational realisation and applications.

Authors:  H Brenner; O Gefeller; T Hakulinen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  The future and the young-old.

Authors:  B L Neugarten
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1975-02

4.  The relative survival rate.

Authors:  D E Henson; L A Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878) and daunorubicin (NSC-83142) therapy in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J W Yates; H J Wallace; R R Ellison; J F Holland
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1973 Nov-Dec

6.  Treatment of acute myelocytic leukemia: a study by cancer and leukemia group B.

Authors:  K R Rai; J F Holland; O J Glidewell; V Weinberg; K Brunner; J P Obrecht; H D Preisler; I W Nawabi; D Prager; R W Carey; M R Cooper; F Haurani; J L Hutchison; R T Silver; G Falkson; P Wiernik; H C Hoagland; C D Bloomfield; G W James; A Gottlieb; S V Ramanan; J Blom; N I Nissen; A Bank; R R Ellison; F Kung; P Henry; O R McIntyre; S K Kaan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  FLT3, RAS, and TP53 mutations in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  D L Stirewalt; K J Kopecky; S Meshinchi; F R Appelbaum; M L Slovak; C L Willman; J P Radich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  C P Leith; K J Kopecky; J Godwin; T McConnell; M L Slovak; I M Chen; D R Head; F R Appelbaum; C L Willman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin or adriamycin for therapy of acute myelocytic leukemia: a CALGB study.

Authors:  J Yates; O Glidewell; P Wiernik; M R Cooper; D Steinberg; H Dosik; R Levy; C Hoagland; P Henry; A Gottlieb; C Cornell; J Berenberg; J L Hutchison; P Raich; N Nissen; R R Ellison; R Frelick; G W James; G Falkson; R T Silver; F Haurani; M Green; E Henderson; L Leone; J F Holland
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Karyotype is an independent prognostic parameter in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML): an analysis of 93 patients with t-AML in comparison to 1091 patients with de novo AML.

Authors:  C Schoch; W Kern; S Schnittger; W Hiddemann; T Haferlach
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  76 in total

1.  Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Armin Rashidi; Maryam Ebadi; Graham A Colditz; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Molecular therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Catherine C Coombs; Martin S Tallman; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  CD33-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit potent preclinical activity against human acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  S S Kenderian; M Ruella; O Shestova; M Klichinsky; V Aikawa; J J D Morrissette; J Scholler; D Song; D L Porter; M Carroll; C H June; S Gill
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  From genomics to targeted treatment in haematological malignancies: a focus on acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Niels Asger Jakobsen; Paresh Vyas
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Elderly acute myeloid leukemia: assessing risk.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 6.  Immunomodulation in leukemia: cellular aspects of anti-leukemic properties.

Authors:  M Maleknia; A Valizadeh; S M S Pezeshki; N Saki
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  H2O2/Peroxynitrite-Activated Hydroxamic Acid HDAC Inhibitor Prodrugs Show Antileukemic Activities against AML Cells.

Authors:  Yi Liao; Liping Xu; Siyu Ou; Holly Edwards; Daniel Luedtke; Yubin Ge; Zhihui Qin
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for treatment of newly diagnosed CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mohammed Gbadamosi; Soheil Meshinchi; Jatinder K Lamba
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  Expression levels of the runt-related transcription factor 1 and 3 genes in the development of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Adrian Krygier; Dagmara Szmajda; Marta Żebrowska; Agnieszka Jeleń; Ewa Balcerczak
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Vosaroxin in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: efficacy and safety in the context of the current treatment landscape.

Authors:  Valeriy Sedov; Robert K Stuart
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.