Literature DB >> 23633373

Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus no intervention or placebo intervention for liver metastases.

Robert P Riemsma1, Malgorzata M Bala, Robert Wolff, Jos Kleijnen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma are the two most common malignant tumours to affect the liver. The liver is second only to the lymph nodes as the most common site for metastatic disease. More than half of the patients with metastatic liver disease will die from metastatic complications. Chemoembolisation is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Therefore, embolisation of the hepatic artery can lead to selective necrosis of the liver tumour while it may leave normal parenchyma virtually unaffected.
OBJECTIVES: To study the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial (chemo)embolisation compared with no intervention or placebo intervention in patients with liver metastases. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS, and CINAHL up to December 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial (chemo)embolisation compared with no intervention or placebo intervention in patients with liver metastases, no matter the location of the primary tumour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcome measures, and data on the outcome measures for our review as well as information on the design and methodology of the studies. Bias risk assessment of the trials, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, and data extraction from the retrieved final evaluation trials were done by one author and checked by a second author. MAIN
RESULTS: One randomised clinical trial fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the review. Sixty-one patients with colorectal liver metastases were randomised into three intervention groups: 22 received hepatic artery embolisation, 19 received hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy, and 20 were randomised to control, described as "no active therapeutic intervention, although symptomatic treatment was provided whenever necessary". As hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy is not in the scope of this review, we have not included the data from this intervention group. In the remaining two groups that were of interest to the review, 43 of the participants were men and 18 women. Most tumours were synchronous metastases involving up to 75% of the liver and non-resectable. The risk of bias in the trial was judged to be high.Patients were followed-up for a minimum of seven months. Mortality at last follow-up was 86% (19/22) in the hepatic artery embolisation group versus 95% (19/20) in the control group (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.1), that is, no statistically significant difference was observed. Median survival after trial entry was 7.0 months (range 2 to 44) in the hepatic artery embolisation group and 7.9 months (range 1 to 26) in the control group. Nine out of 22 (41%) in the hepatic artery embolisation group and five out of 20 (25%) in the control group developed evidence of extrahepatic disease (RR 1.64; 95% CI 0.60 to 4.07). Local recurrence was reported for 10 patients in the trial without details about the trial group. Most patients in the embolisation group experienced post-embolic syndrome (82%), and one patient had local haematoma. No other adverse events were reported. The authors did not report if there were any adverse events in the control group. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of one small randomised trial that did not describe sequence generation, allocation concealment or blinding, it can be concluded that in patients with liver metastases no significant survival benefit or benefit on extrahepatic recurrence was found in the embolisation group in comparison with the palliation group. The probability for selective outcome reporting bias in the trial is high. At present, transarterial (chemo)embolisation cannot be recommended outside randomised clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23633373     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009498.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  11 in total

1.  Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus no intervention or placebo for liver metastases.

Authors:  Mateusz J Swierz; Dawid Storman; Robert P Riemsma; Robert Wolff; Jerzy W Mitus; Michal Pedziwiatr; Jos Kleijnen; Malgorzata M Bala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 2.  Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for colorectal liver metastases--current status and critical review.

Authors:  Alexander Massmann; Thomas Rodt; Steffen Marquardt; Roland Seidel; Katrina Thomas; Frank Wacker; Götz M Richter; Hans U Kauczor; Arno Bücker; Philippe L Pereira; Christof M Sommer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Predictive and Prognostic Factors of Synchronous Colorectal Lung-Limited Metastasis.

Authors:  Yuqiang Li; Zhongyi Zhou; Da Liu; Ming Zhou; Fengbo Tan; Wenxue Liu; Hong Zhu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 4.  Radioembolization as a Treatment Strategy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver: What Can We Learn from the SIRFLOX Trial?

Authors:  Bippan Singh Sangha; Halla Nimeiri; Ryan Hickey; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-06

5.  18 F-FDG PET/MR imaging in patients with suspected liver lesions: Value of liver-specific contrast agent Gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Julian Kirchner; Lino M Sawicki; Cornelius Deuschl; Johannes Grüneisen; Karsten Beiderwellen; Thomas C Lauenstein; Ken Herrmann; Michael Forsting; Philipp Heusch; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Preoperative left hepatic lobe devascularisation to minimize perioperative bleeding in a Jehovah's Witness undergoing left hepatectomy.

Authors:  Laurence Weinberg; Georgina Hanus; Jonathan Banting; Diana Abu-Ssaydeh; Manfred Spanger; Su Kah Goh; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-15

Review 7.  The Role of Liver-Directed Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hon Lyn Tan; Matilda Lee; Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Wee Thong Neo; Wei Peng Yong
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2018-09-13

8.  The Nrf2 inhibitor brusatol is a potent antitumour agent in an orthotopic mouse model of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Boleslaw K Winiarski; Paul A Sutton; Robert P Jones; Lorenzo Ressel; Carrie A Duckworth; D Mark Pritchard; Zhi-Xiu Lin; Vicky L Fretwell; Elizabeth M Tweedle; Eithne Costello; Christopher E Goldring; Ian M Copple; B Kevin Park; Daniel H Palmer; Neil R Kitteringham
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 9.  Radiomics for liver tumours.

Authors:  Constantin Dreher; Philipp Linde; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Bettina Baessler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Significant Shrinkage of Multifocal Liver Metastases and Long-Term Survival in a Patient With Rectal Cancer, After Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE): A Case Report.

Authors:  Bogdan Andrei Suciu; Simona Gurzu; Lucian Marginean; Doina Milutin; Ioana Halmaciu; Ioan Jung; Klara Branzaniuc; Calin Molnar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.