Literature DB >> 23632655

Menopause education: needs assessment of American obstetrics and gynecology residents.

Mindy S Christianson1, Jennifer A Ducie, Kristiina Altman, Ayatallah M Khafagy, Wen Shen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand the current teaching of menopause medicine in American obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.
METHODS: A Web-based survey was e-mailed to all American obstetrics and gynecology residency directors, with a request that they forward it to their residents.
RESULTS: Of 258 residency program directors contacted, 79 (30.6%) confirmed forwarding the survey. In all, 1,799 people received the survey, with 510 completions, for a response rate of 28.3%. Most residents reported that they had limited knowledge and needed to learn more about these aspects of menopause medicine: pathophysiology of menopause symptoms (67.1%), hormone therapy (68.1%), nonhormone therapy (79.0%), bone health (66.1%), cardiovascular disease (71.7%), and metabolic syndrome (69.5%). Among fourth-year residents who will be entering clinical practice soon, a large proportion also reported a need to learn more in these areas: pathophysiology of menopause symptoms (45.9%), hormone therapy (54.2%), nonhormone therapy (69.4%), bone health (54.2%), cardiovascular disease (64.3%), and metabolic syndrome (63.8%). When asked to rate the most preferred modalities for learning about menopause, the top choice was supervised clinics (53.2%), followed by case presentations (22.2%), formal lectures (21.3%), small groups (14.7%), Web-based learning (7.8%), and independent reading (5.2%). Only 20.8% of residents reported that their program had a formal menopause medicine learning curriculum, and 16.3% had a defined menopause clinic as part of their residency.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that some American residency programs do not fulfill the educational goals of their residents in menopause medicine. A curriculum would be beneficial for increasing knowledge and clinical experience on menopause issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23632655     DOI: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31828ced7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  4 in total

Review 1.  Update: A Review of Women's Health Fellowships, Their Role in Interdisciplinary Health Care, and the Need for Accreditation.

Authors:  Heather Foreman; Lauren Weber; Holly L Thacker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Facing Provider Misconceptions Towards the Use of Hormone Therapy in 2020.

Authors:  Heather Hirsch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Predictors of Initiating Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hasan Çilgin
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2019-01-09

4.  It's Getting Hot in Here: Piloting a Telemedicine OSCE Addressing Menopausal Concerns for Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship Students.

Authors:  Hadley W Reid; Kelly Branford; Tracey Reynolds; Melody Baldwin; Sarah Dotters-Katz
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-04-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.