Literature DB >> 23632625

Estimation and selection of complex covariate effects in pooled nested case-control studies with heterogeneity.

Mengling Liu1, Wenbin Lu, Vittorio Krogh, Göran Hallmans, Tess V Clendenen, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte.   

Abstract

A major challenge in cancer epidemiologic studies, especially those of rare cancers, is observing enough cases. To address this, researchers often join forces by bringing multiple studies together to achieve large sample sizes, allowing for increased power in hypothesis testing, and improved efficiency in effect estimation. Combining studies, however, renders the analysis difficult owing to the presence of heterogeneity in the pooled data. In this article, motivated by a collaborative nested case-control (NCC) study of ovarian cancer in three cohorts from United States, Sweden, and Italy, we investigate the use of penalty regularized partial likelihood estimation in the context of pooled NCC studies to achieve two goals. First, we propose an adaptive group lasso (gLASSO) penalized approach to simultaneously identify important variables and estimate their effects. Second, we propose a composite agLASSO penalized approach to identify variables with heterogeneous effects. Both methods are readily implemented with the group coordinate gradient decent algorithm and shown to enjoy the oracle property. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the performance of our proposed approaches in finite samples under various heterogeneity settings, and apply them to the pooled ovarian cancer study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox's proportional hazards model; Group penalty; Heterogeneity; Nested case–control sampling; Ovarian cancer; Pooled studies; Shrinkage estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23632625      PMCID: PMC3841381          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  13 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

Authors:  Simon G Thompson; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Integrative analysis and variable selection with multiple high-dimensional data sets.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang; Xiao Song
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang; Fengrong Wei; Yang Xie; Kuangnan Fang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Methods for pooled analyses of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  C M Friedenreich
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  High-dimensional variable selection in meta-analysis for censored data.

Authors:  Fei Liu; David Dunson; Fei Zou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Multi-population GWA mapping via multi-task regularized regression.

Authors:  Kriti Puniyani; Seyoung Kim; Eric P Xing
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants' data in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Philip S Rosenberg; James J Goedert; Thomas R O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of homogeneous and heterogeneous variables in pooled cohort studies.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Wenbin Lu; Mengling Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Powers of the likelihood ratio test and the correlation test using empirical bayes estimates for various shrinkages in population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  F P Combes; S Retout; N Frey; F Mentré
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-09

3.  Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Guangjun Shi; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.