BACKGROUND: There is recognition that teenagers and young adults with cancer merit age-appropriate specialist care. However, outcomes associated with such specialist care are not defined. Patient experience and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life are gaining importance. Nevertheless, there is a lack of theoretical basis and patient involvement in experience surveys for young people. OBJECTIVE: We previously proposed a conceptual model of the lived experience of cancer. We aimed to refine this model adding to areas that were lacking or underreported. The proposed conceptual framework will inform a bespoke patient experience survey for young people. METHODS: Using participatory research, 11 young people aged 13 to 25 years at diagnosis, participated in a 1-day workshop consisting of semistructured peer-to-peer interviews. RESULTS: Eight core themes emerged: impact of cancer diagnosis, information provision, place of care, role of health professionals, coping, peers, psychological support, and life after cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual framework has informed survey development for a longitudinal cohort study examining patient experience and outcomes associated with specialist cancer care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Young people must be kept at the center of interactions in recognition of their stated needs of engagement, of individually tailored information and support unproxied by parents/family. Age-appropriate information and support services that help young people deal with the impact of cancer on daily life and life after cancer must be made available. If we are to develop services that meet need, patient experience surveys must be influenced by patient involvement. Young people can be successfully involved in planning research relevant to their experience.
BACKGROUND: There is recognition that teenagers and young adults with cancer merit age-appropriate specialist care. However, outcomes associated with such specialist care are not defined. Patient experience and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life are gaining importance. Nevertheless, there is a lack of theoretical basis and patient involvement in experience surveys for young people. OBJECTIVE: We previously proposed a conceptual model of the lived experience of cancer. We aimed to refine this model adding to areas that were lacking or underreported. The proposed conceptual framework will inform a bespoke patient experience survey for young people. METHODS: Using participatory research, 11 young people aged 13 to 25 years at diagnosis, participated in a 1-day workshop consisting of semistructured peer-to-peer interviews. RESULTS: Eight core themes emerged: impact of cancer diagnosis, information provision, place of care, role of health professionals, coping, peers, psychological support, and life after cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual framework has informed survey development for a longitudinal cohort study examining patient experience and outcomes associated with specialist cancer care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Young people must be kept at the center of interactions in recognition of their stated needs of engagement, of individually tailored information and support unproxied by parents/family. Age-appropriate information and support services that help young people deal with the impact of cancer on daily life and life after cancer must be made available. If we are to develop services that meet need, patient experience surveys must be influenced by patient involvement. Young people can be successfully involved in planning research relevant to their experience.
Authors: Susan M Sawyer; Robyn McNeil; Maria McCarthy; Lisa Orme; Kate Thompson; Sarah Drew; David Dunt Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alex W K Wong; Ting-Ting Chang; Katrina Christopher; Stephen C L Lau; Lynda K Beaupin; Brad Love; Kim L Lipsey; Michael Feuerstein Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Victoria Szydlowski; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Stanley Ip; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Rachael Fleurence; David H Hickam Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebecca J Birch; Eva J A Morris; Dan P Stark; Sue Morgan; Ian J Lewis; Robert M West; Richard G Feltbower Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Rachel M Taylor; Jasjeet Mohain; Faith Gibson; Anita Solanki; Jeremy Whelan; Lorna A Fern Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-03-14 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Lauren E Ellis; Lauren Edmundson; Raj Sabharwal; Alison Rein; Kristen Konopka; Lori Frank Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rachel M Taylor; Lorna A Fern; Anita Solanki; Louise Hooker; Anna Carluccio; Julia Pye; David Jeans; Tom Frere-Smith; Faith Gibson; Julie Barber; Rosalind Raine; Dan Stark; Richard Feltbower; Susie Pearce; Jeremy S Whelan Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 3.186