Literature DB >> 23631710

Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: contributions by parents, peers and the media.

Kathleen Ragsdale1, Melina M Bersamin, Seth J Schwartz, Byron L Zamboanga, Madeleine R Kerrick, Joel W Grube.   

Abstract

To expand the scant research on sexual expectancies development among non-sexually active adolescents, we examined the relationship between adolescents' exposure to four socializing agents--mother/female guardian, father/male guardian, peers, and television programs with high sexual content--and their endorsement of four sexual expectancies: social benefit, pleasure, social risk, and health risk. Data are from Waves 2 and 3 of a three-wave annual longitudinal study conducted among California adolescents, the majority of whom were not sexually active (N = 914, 84%). Structural equation models were conducted to examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between the socializing agents and the sexual expectancies. Cross-sectional results indicate associations between peer sexual communication and social benefit, pleasure, and social risk expectancies. A positive association was found between exposure to music videos and social benefit expectancies, and a negative association was found between exposure to music videos and health risk expectancies. Longitudinal results suggest that communication with peers positively predicted pleasure expectancies and negatively predicted social risk expectancies. No other socializing agents were associated with any sexual expectancies. An invariance test found that significant correlations were similar across the different age groups. Results suggest that efforts to support positive sexual decision making among non-sexually active adolescents should target peer sexual communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23631710      PMCID: PMC3884044          DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2012.753025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  37 in total

1.  The Role of Communication with Friends in Sexual Initiation.

Authors:  Peter Busse; Martin Fishbein; Amy Bleakley; Michael Hennessy
Journal:  Communic Res       Date:  2010-04-01

2.  Identity, peer relationships, and adolescent girls' sexual behavior: an exploration of the contemporary double standard.

Authors:  Heidi Lyons; Peggy C Giordano; Wendy D Manning; Monica A Longmore
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2011-05-24

3.  Contraception knowledge and sexual behaviour in secondary school students.

Authors:  María-Fabiana Reina; Hugo Ciaravino; Norma Llovera; Camil Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Parents' perspectives on talking to preteenage children about sex.

Authors:  Ellen K Wilson; Barbara T Dalberth; Helen P Koo; Jennifer C Gard
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-03

5.  Long-term influence of sexual norms and attitudes on timing of sexual initiation among urban minority youth.

Authors:  Lydia O'Donnell; Athi Myint-U; Carl R O'Donnell; Ann Stueve
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.118

6.  It's better on TV: does television set teenagers up for regret following sexual initiation?

Authors:  Steven C Martino; Rebecca L Collins; Marc N Elliott; David E Kanouse; Sandra H Berry
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2009-06

7.  Watching sex on television predicts adolescent initiation of sexual behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca L Collins; Marc N Elliott; Sandra H Berry; David E Kanouse; Dale Kunkel; Sarah B Hunter; Angela Miu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Alcohol advertising exposure and perceptions: links with alcohol expectancies and intentions to drink or drinking in underaged youth and young adults.

Authors:  Kenneth Fleming; Esther Thorson; Charles K Atkin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

9.  How sources of sexual information relate to adolescents' beliefs about sex.

Authors:  Amy Bleakley; Michael Hennessy; Martin Fishbein; Amy Jordan
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

10.  Understanding the association between authoritative parenting and adolescent smoking.

Authors:  Brian C Castrucci; Karen K Gerlach
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-03-23
View more
  6 in total

1.  The Prevalence of Using Pornography for Information About How to Have Sex: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey of U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Emily F Rothman; Jonathon J Beckmeyer; Debby Herbenick; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Brian Dodge; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  How Patterns of Learning About Sexual Information Among Adolescents Are Related to Sexual Behaviors.

Authors:  Amy Bleakley; Atika Khurana; Michael Hennessy; Morgan Ellithorpe
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-02-20

3.  The Double Standard at Sexual Debut: Gender, Sexual Behavior and Adolescent Peer Acceptance.

Authors:  Derek A Kreager; Jeremy Staff; Robin Gauthier; Eva S Lefkowitz; Mark E Feinberg
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  The Nature and Impact of Gendered Patterns of Peer Sexual Communications Among Heterosexual Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Sarah L Trinh; L Monique Ward
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-08-04

5.  Sexual Double Standards: Contributions of Sexual Socialization by Parents, Peers, and the Media.

Authors:  Joyce J Endendijk; Maja Deković; Helen Vossen; Anneloes L van Baar; Ellen Reitz
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Do sexual expectancies and inhibitions predict high-risk sexual behaviours? Evidence from a cross-sectional survey among young psychoactive substance users in informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Tonny Ssekamatte; Simon P S Kibira; Moses Tetui; John Bosco Isunju; Richard K Mugambe; Solomon Tsebeni Wafula; Esther Buregyeya; Christine Kayemba Nalwadda; Justine Nnakate Bukenya; Rhoda K Wanyenze
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.