Literature DB >> 23630473

Cerebral low-molecular metabolites influenced by intestinal microbiota: a pilot study.

Mitsuharu Matsumoto1, Ryoko Kibe, Takushi Ooga, Yuji Aiba, Emiko Sawaki, Yasuhiro Koga, Yoshimi Benno.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that intestinal microbiota influences gut-brain communication. In this study, we aimed to clarify the influence of intestinal microbiota on cerebral metabolism. We analyzed the cerebral metabolome of germ-free (GF) mice and Ex-GF mice, which were inoculated with suspension of feces obtained from specific pathogen-free mice, using capillary electrophoresis with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS). CE-TOFMS identified 196 metabolites from the cerebral metabolome in both GF and Ex-GF mice. The concentrations of 38 metabolites differed significantly (p < 0.05) between GF and Ex-GF mice. Approximately 10 of these metabolites are known to be involved in brain function, whilst the functions of the remainder are unclear. Furthermore, we observed a novel association between cerebral glycolytic metabolism and intestinal microbiota. Our work shows that cerebral metabolites are influenced by normal intestinal microbiota through the microbiota-gut-brain axis, and indicates that normal intestinal microbiota closely connected with brain health and disease, development, attenuation, learning, memory, and behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrum; gut-brain axis; intestinal microbiota; metabolome; neurotransmitter

Year:  2013        PMID: 23630473      PMCID: PMC3632785          DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5137


Introduction

Intestinal microbiota play a fundamentally important role in health and diseases (Backhed et al., 2005). Recently, the relationship between intestinal microbiota and systemic phenomena beyond the intestinal environment, such as obesity (Turnbaugh et al., 2006) and lifespan (Matsumoto et al., 2011), have been reported. The bidirectional signaling between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain, the gut-brain axis, is vital for maintaining homeostasis and is regulated at the neural, hormonal, and immunological levels. The importance of the gut-brain axis is further emphasized by the high incidence of co-morbidities between stress-related psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, and gastrointestinal disorders (Camara et al., 2009). Recent studies have investigated the effect of gut microbiota on brain and behavior. The results of these studies suggest that intestinal microbiota have a great impact on gut-brain communication, which led to the coining of the term “microbiota-gut-brain axis” (MGB axis) (Rhee et al., 2009; Cryan and Dinan, 2012). For example, intestinal microbiota modulates brain development and subsequent adult behavior, such as motor activity and anxiety (Heijtz et al., 2011; Neufeld et al., 2011). Studies on the MGB axis have focused on the central nervous system (CNS), including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (Sudo et al., 2004; Rhee et al., 2009), neurotransmitter, and synapse related factors (for example, PSD-95, synaptophysin; Heijtz et al., 2011), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Heijtz et al., 2011; Neufeld et al., 2011). However, to the best of our knowledge, other metabolites stimulated by the MGB axis have not been investigated. Furthermore, some metabolites may be synthesized independently in the brain and may be influenced by MGB axis, while some metabolites produced by intestinal bacteria may be transported from the colonic lumen to the brain in the bloodstream without filtration by blood-brain barrier (BBB). Capillary electrophoresis with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS) is a novel strategy for analyzing and differentially displaying metabolic profiles (Monton and Soga, 2007). Here, using CE-TOFMS, we analyzed the cerebral metabolome obtained from germ-free (GF) mice and Ex-GF mice, harboring intestinal microbiota from specific pathogen-free mice and demonstrated the large effect of intestinal microbiota on the cerebral metabolome.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Germ-free BALB/c mice were purchased originally from Japan Clea Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), and were bred in the Department of Infectious Diseases, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan. We divided six male mice bred from mating into two groups, GF mice (GF 1–3) and Ex-GF mice (Ex-GF 1–3). Mice were housed in Trexler-Type flexible film plastic isolators with sterilized clean tip (CLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo) as bedding. They were given sterilized water and sterilized commercial CL-2 pellets, which consisted of moisture (8.5%), crude protein (24.5%), crude fat (8.0%), crude fiber (4.4%), crude ash (8.5%), and nitrogen free extracts (48.2%), corresponding to 344.7 kcal/100 g (CLEA Japan, Inc.), ad libitum. The diet was sterilized with an autoclave (121°C, 30 min). Surveillance for bacterial contamination was performed by periodic bacteriological examination of feces throughout the experiments. Ex-GF mice were inoculated at 4 weeks of age into the stomach by a metal catheter with 0.5 mL of a 10−1 suspension of feces obtained from SPF BALB/c mice. The protocols approved by the Kyodo Milk Animal Use Committee (Permit Number: 2009-02) and all experimental procedures were performed according to the guidelines of the Animal Care Committee of Tokai University.

Specimen preparation and CE-TOFMS

Mice (7-week-old mice) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The brain was resected on ice, and prefrontal cortex was sliced between 2.5 and 3.5 mm anterior to bregma within 5 min of sacrifice. Immediately after the sacrifaction, cardiac blood (approximately approximately 100 μl) was collected, and sodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate plasma (final concentration was 0.13%) was prepared by centrifugation for 20 min at 2,300 × g and 4°C. The samples were stored at −80°C until use. Cardiac plasma (50 μl) and methanol (450 μl) with 50 μM intestinal standard were vortexed. The plasma homogenate served as crude metabolome and was added to chloroform (500 μl) and Milli-Q (200 μl), mixed, and centrifuged (2,300 × g, for 5 min at 4°C). The aqueous layer was centrifugally filtered through a 5-kDa cutoff filter Ultrafree-MC (Millipore). The filtrated solution was dried up and suspended in 25 μL Milli-Q water just before the measurement. The cerebrums were suspended in methanol (500 μl) with 50 μM intestinal standard and vortexed vigorously five times for 60 s with a MicroSmash MS-100R (Tomy Digital Biology Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 4,000 rpm. The resulting cerebrum sample served as crude metabolome that subsequently underwent the same treatment as the plasma crude metabolome. Metabolomics measurement and data processing were performed as described previously with an Agilent Capillary Electrophoresis System (Ooga et al., 2011). The CE-MS system is the Agilent G1600A Capillary Electrophoresis System connected with the Agilent G1969A LC/MSD TOF (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

RNA preparation and quantitative real-time PCR of the cerebrums

Frozen prefrontal cerebrums were processed for total RNA preparation with TaKaRa FastPure RNA Kits (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). The quantity, purity, and integrity were confirmed initially by electrophoresis. cDNA for each sample was synthesized using 200 ng total RNA and PrimeScript RT reagent Kits (Takara Bio Inc.). Real-time PCR was performed with a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using TaqMan probes (hexokinase 1: Mm00439344_m1, phosphofructokinase: Mm00445461_m1, and β-actin: Mm02619580_g1). The comparative delta Ct method was used for normalizations to the housekeeping gene β-actin.

Intestinal bacterial compositions

Bacterial compositions were determined using pyrosequencing system. Bacterial DNA was isolated from colonic content samples of mice. The 16S rRNA was targeted to identify intestinal bacteria and a pair of universal primers; 27f (5 –AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG–3) and 350r (5 –CTG CTG CCT CCC GTA G–3) were used for PCR. Amplicons were applied to GS titanium sequencing Kit (Roche Diagnostics) include emulsion PCR and analyzed by Genome sequencer FLX system (Roche Diagnostics). About 18,000–20,500 sequences in each sample were identified. Sequences data were compared with DDBJ database (Blast) and classified by taxonomic categories.

Data analysis and statistics

Clustering analysis in metabolome was processed by MATLAB 2008a (MathWorks, MA, USA). Differences in relative quantity between GF mice and Ex-GF mice were evaluated for individual metabolites by Welch’s t-test.

Results

The difference in cerebral metabolome between GF and Ex-GF mice

When the mice were sacrificed, the body weights of GF mice were between 22 and 24 g and those of Ex-GF mice were between 22 and 25 g. CE-TOFMS identified 196 (120 cations and 76 anions) metabolites from the cerebral metabolome in both of GF and Ex-GF mice. Hierarchical clustering of metabolite patterns is shown in Figure 1A. A remarkable difference was observed in the cerebral metabolome between GF and Ex-GF mice. Of the 196 metabolites in the cerebral metabolome, the concentrations of 23 metabolites were at least 1.6-fold, and/or significantly (p < 0.05) higher, in GF mice than Ex-GF mice (group GF > Ex-GF). A further 15 metabolites were at least 1.6-fold, and significantly (p < 0.05) higher, in Ex-GF mice than GF mice (group GF < Ex-GF), and/or 158 metabolites showed no difference in concentration or incidence between GF and Ex-GF mice (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Difference in the cerebral metabolome between GF mice and Ex-GF mice. (A) Hierarchical clustering showing patterns of metabolites. Red and green indicate high and low concentrations of metabolites, respectively. (B) The number of cerebral metabolites in the group. GF > Ex-GF; GF ≈ Ex-GF; and GF < Ex-GF.

Difference in the cerebral metabolome between GF mice and Ex-GF mice. (A) Hierarchical clustering showing patterns of metabolites. Red and green indicate high and low concentrations of metabolites, respectively. (B) The number of cerebral metabolites in the group. GF > Ex-GF; GF ≈ Ex-GF; and GF < Ex-GF. Identified metabolites were classified into eight categories and are listed in Table A1 in Appendix (anion) and Table A2 (cation) in Appendix. Metabolites, in which there are significant differences between GF and Ex-GF mice, are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table A1

Anionic metabolites detected from cerebrum in GF mice and Ex-GF mice.

IDHMT DB
Relative area§
Comparative analysis
Compound nameKEGG IDHMDB IDGerm-free
SPF
Germ-free
SPF
SPF vs. Germ-free
GF1GF2GF3Ex-GF1Ex-GF2Ex-GF3MeanSDMeanSDRatio1p-Value2
A_00522,3-Diphosphoglyceric acidC01159HMDB012947.6E-056.7E-051.2E-041.5E-041.3E-042.0E-048.7E-052.7E-051.6E-044.0E-051.8530.064
A_00072-Hydroxyisobutyric acidHMDB007291.3E-041.6E-041.8E-043.0E-042.2E-042.1E-041.6E-042.3E-052.4E-044.7E-051.5250.073
A_0041PhosphocreatineC02305HMDB015111.1E-041.1E-049.9E-051.8E-041.6E-041.1E-041.1E-047.2E-061.5E-043.5E-051.4300.146
A_00155-OxoprolineC01879HMDB002671.9E-031.0E-035.4E-042.5E-031.6E-037.5E-041.1E-036.9E-041.6E-038.6E-041.3980.517
A_0088ADP-riboseC00301HMDB011782.2E-042.3E-043.8E-042.6E-043.8E-044.1E-042.7E-049.0E-053.5E-047.8E-051.2720.338
A_0044Ribose 5-phosphateC00117HMDB015481.1E-041.1E-041.1E-041.3E-041.4E-041.2E-041.1E-043.2E-061.3E-049.1E-061.1900.044*
A_0037Isocitric acidC00311HMDB001931.1E-041.7E-041.2E-041.3E-041.5E-041.9E-041.3E-043.1E-051.6E-043.1E-051.1890.377
A_0087GTPC00044HMDB012734.1E-043.9E-045.3E-046.2E-044.7E-044.6E-044.5E-047.9E-055.2E-049.0E-051.1670.345
A_0067NADPH_divalentC00005HMDB002215.4E-057.7E-057.4E-058.5E-056.9E-058.5E-056.8E-051.2E-058.0E-059.4E-061.1660.281
A_00132-Hydroxyvaleric acidHMDB018631.5E-041.7E-041.1E-041.9E-041.3E-041.9E-041.5E-042.8E-051.7E-043.3E-051.1620.397
A_0036Citric acidC00158HMDB000946.3E-037.2E-036.3E-039.3E-035.7E-037.8E-036.6E-035.3E-047.6E-031.8E-031.1530.433
A_0032Homovanillic acidC05582HMDB001189.4E-051.6E-041.6E-041.5E-041.6E-041.5E-041.4E-043.8E-051.5E-045.1E-061.1090.568
A_0048myo-Inositol 1-phosphate myo-Inositol 3-phosphateC01177C04006HMDB00213HMDB068146.6E-046.0E-045.5E-047.3E-045.9E-046.7E-046.0E-045.8E-056.6E-046.7E-051.0980.317
A_0025Uric acidC00366HMDB002896.0E-057.8E-055.9E-056.3E-057.8E-056.9E-056.6E-051.1E-057.0E-057.9E-061.0680.592
A_0074Acetyl CoA_divalentC00024HMDB012065.5E-055.4E-054.6E-054.6E-055.6E-056.1E-055.2E-055.3E-065.4E-057.9E-061.0480.677
A_00233-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaric acidC03761-3.5E-043.1E-043.0E-043.6E-043.4E-043.1E-043.2E-042.3E-053.4E-042.4E-051.0470.479
A_0077GDPC00035HMDB012011.5E-031.7E-032.1E-031.9E-031.6E-032.0E-031.8E-033.1E-041.8E-032.3E-041.0330.803
A_0093UDP-N-acetyl glucosamineC00043HMDB002909.1E-041.0E-031.0E-031.1E-039.5E-049.9E-049.8E-046.5E-051.0E-038.3E-051.0300.654
A_0056N-Acetyl glucosamine 6-phosphateC00357HMDB010621.2E-049.6E-058.0E-051.3E-049.3E-057.4E-059.7E-051.8E-051.0E-043.0E-051.0250.909
A_0083CDP-cholineC00307HMDB014132.0E-041.8E-042.6E-042.2E-041.8E-042.4E-042.1E-044.0E-052.1E-043.1E-051.0120.935
A_0002Propionic acidC00163HMDB002371.7E-049.9E-051.1E-041.4E-041.3E-041.0E-041.3E-044.0E-051.3E-042.1E-051.0100.964
A_0092GDP-mannose GDP-galactoseC00096C02280HMDB01163 -1.8E-042.2E-042.2E-042.1E-041.9E-042.4E-042.1E-042.3E-052.1E-042.4E-051.0050.955
A_0017Malic acidC00149, C00497, C00711HMDB00156, HMDB007441.5E-021.6E-021.5E-021.5E-021.3E-021.7E-021.5E-026.0E-041.5E-021.8E-031.0010.992
A_0010Fumaric acidC00122HMDB001341.9E-032.1E-031.9E-031.8E-031.7E-032.4E-032.0E-031.0E-042.0E-033.5E-040.9970.977
A_0016N-Acetyl-β-alanineC010735.8E-057.2E-056.8E-056.8E-056.1E-056.6E-056.6E-057.3E-066.5E-053.7E-060.9870.870
A_0091ADP-glucose GDP-fucoseC00498C00325HMDB06557HMDB010958.2E-058.5E-058.9E-059.7E-057.9E-057.8E-058.6E-053.6E-068.5E-051.0E-050.9870.873
A_0035N-Acetyl glutamic acidC00624HMDB011387.1E-046.6E-046.4E-046.9E-046.6E-046.1E-046.7E-043.6E-056.5E-044.1E-050.9810.714
A_0029cis-Aconitic acidC00417HMDB000721.6E-042.8E-041.5E-041.6E-041.9E-042.3E-042.0E-047.3E-051.9E-043.3E-050.9740.920
A_0043Ribulose 5-phosphateC00199, C01101HMDB006182.5E-032.1E-031.7E-032.1E-032.3E-031.8E-032.1E-033.9E-042.1E-032.4E-040.9690.817
A_0068CoA_divalentC00010HMDB014234.1E-044.1E-044.4E-043.8E-043.8E-044.1E-044.2E-042.0E-053.9E-042.0E-050.9270.138
A_0022Pelargonic acidC01601HMDB008478.7E-055.5E-056.7E-055.3E-055.4E-058.7E-057.0E-051.6E-056.5E-051.9E-050.9270.743
A_0006Lactic acidC00186, C00256, C01432HMDB00190, HMDB013112.9E-012.8E-013.1E-012.7E-012.5E-013.0E-013.0E-011.3E-022.7E-012.7E-020.9200.262
A_0094CMP-N-acetylneuraminateC00128HMDB011764.7E-045.7E-045.2E-044.9E-045.4E-043.9E-045.2E-044.9E-054.7E-047.7E-050.9190.481
A_0031Ascorbic acidC00072HMDB000443.5E-023.5E-023.2E-023.3E-022.8E-023.3E-023.4E-021.6E-033.1E-023.0E-030.9180.255
A_0061cAMPC00575HMDB000582.7E-054.3E-053.5E-053.9E-052.3E-053.4E-053.5E-057.8E-063.2E-057.9E-060.9160.667
A_0085ATPC00002HMDB005381.1E-031.1E-031.0E-031.1E-031.0E-037.9E-041.1E-033.4E-059.7E-041.7E-040.9150.455
A_0070FAD_divalentC00016HMDB012485.9E-057.3E-057.6E-056.5E-056.3E-055.7E-056.9E-059.2E-066.2E-054.0E-060.8900.288
A_0090UDP-glucuronic acidC00167HMDB009351.2E-041.4E-041.2E-041.1E-041.1E-041.2E-041.2E-041.3E-051.1E-044.9E-060.8790.172
A_0051Glucose 1-phosphateC00103HMDB015861.5E-042.0E-042.0E-041.8E-041.3E-041.7E-041.8E-042.9E-051.6E-042.3E-050.8690.328
A_0018Threonic acidC01620HMDB009431.2E-031.4E-031.3E-031.3E-031.0E-031.1E-031.3E-038.1E-051.1E-031.8E-040.8600.211
A_0057N-Acetylneuraminic acidC00270HMDB002301.1E-031.0E-031.0E-039.2E-048.9E-048.1E-041.0E-034.3E-058.7E-045.6E-050.8460.020*
A_0014Isethionic acidC05123HMDB039038.2E-049.5E-041.1E-037.7E-048.8E-047.6E-049.5E-041.3E-048.0E-046.6E-050.8460.172
A_0089UDP-glucose UDP-galactoseC00029C00052HMDB00286HMDB003021.2E-031.5E-031.3E-031.0E-031.1E-031.3E-031.3E-031.3E-041.1E-031.1E-040.8460.110
A_0030N-Acetylaspartic acidC01042HMDB008122.0E-012.0E-012.2E-011.8E-011.6E-011.7E-012.1E-011.0E-021.7E-018.5E-030.8380.014*
A_0073UDPC00015HMDB002951.0E-041.2E-041.2E-041.1E-048.5E-059.2E-051.2E-041.1E-059.6E-051.4E-050.8330.135
A_00093-Hydroxybutyric acidC01089, C03197HMDB00011, HMDB00357, HMDB004429.8E-041.2E-038.5E-047.7E-048.8E-048.4E-041.0E-031.6E-048.3E-045.6E-050.8330.196
A_0054Sedoheptulose 7-phosphateC05382HMDB010689.5E-051.1E-041.2E-046.6E-051.0E-041.1E-041.1E-041.4E-059.1E-052.2E-050.8310.298
A_0042Pantothenic acidC00864HMDB002104.1E-044.5E-044.5E-043.2E-043.7E-043.8E-044.4E-042.1E-053.6E-043.2E-050.8190.029*
A_0038Gluconic acidC00257HMDB006251.3E-041.1E-041.4E-041.1E-041.0E-049.8E-051.3E-041.3E-051.0E-046.6E-060.8160.063
A_0040Lauric acidC02679HMDB006381.5E-041.2E-041.5E-041.5E-041.1E-048.5E-051.4E-041.6E-051.1E-043.2E-050.8160.308
A_0064AMPC00020HMDB000451.6E-022.1E-022.3E-021.7E-021.3E-021.9E-022.0E-023.7E-031.6E-023.3E-030.8100.248
A_0046BiotinC00120HMDB000302.1E-042.4E-042.2E-041.7E-042.0E-041.6E-042.2E-041.7E-051.8E-041.8E-050.8040.038*
A_0055N-Acetylglucosamine 1-phosphateC04256HMDB013671.3E-041.2E-041.2E-041.2E-049.2E-059.0E-051.3E-046.0E-061.0E-041.9E-050.8030.147
A_0050myo-Inositol 2-phosphate7.5E-048.0E-049.6E-045.4E-046.3E-048.3E-048.4E-041.1E-046.7E-041.5E-040.7990.191
A_00452-Deoxyglucose 6-phosphateC063698.4E-051.3E-046.9E-059.6E-055.2E-057.6E-059.4E-053.1E-057.4E-052.2E-050.7930.434
A_0005Butyric acidC00246HMDB000393.9E-055.5E-057.0E-054.6E-055.0E-053.4E-055.5E-051.5E-054.3E-058.2E-060.7890.333
A_0059CMPC00055HMDB000952.1E-043.5E-043.3E-042.1E-041.7E-043.0E-043.0E-047.6E-052.3E-046.8E-050.7570.286
A_0076ADPC00008HMDB013414.7E-035.7E-034.9E-033.8E-033.7E-034.0E-035.1E-035.4E-043.8E-031.3E-040.7550.050*
A_0078Adenylosuccinic acidC03794HMDB005366.4E-048.0E-047.4E-044.6E-044.7E-047.1E-047.2E-048.1E-055.4E-041.4E-040.7530.153
A_0019Ethanolamine phosphateC00346HMDB002241.3E-021.6E-021.8E-021.2E-021.1E-021.2E-021.6E-022.3E-031.2E-023.9E-040.7430.091
A_0066GMPC00144HMDB013972.5E-033.3E-033.3E-032.1E-032.0E-032.5E-033.0E-034.8E-042.2E-032.6E-040.7300.079
A_0012Succinic acidC00042HMDB002542.0E-022.1E-021.9E-021.5E-021.6E-021.3E-022.0E-021.3E-031.4E-021.7E-030.7190.012*
A_00213-Phenylpropionic acidC05629HMDB007641.3E-041.3E-041.1E-048.6E-058.0E-059.8E-051.2E-041.3E-058.8E-059.0E-060.7150.023*
A_0095NAD+C00003HMDB009021.3E-031.9E-031.7E-031.2E-039.6E-041.2E-031.6E-033.2E-041.1E-031.5E-040.7020.107
A_0027Dihydroxyacetone phosphateC00111HMDB014731.9E-042.0E-042.2E-041.2E-041.7E-041.3E-042.0E-041.2E-051.4E-042.3E-050.6940.024*
A_0065IMPC00130HMDB001752.5E-032.8E-032.7E-032.1E-031.7E-031.7E-032.7E-031.7E-041.8E-032.6E-040.6910.015*
A_00082-Hydroxybutyric acidC05984HMDB000087.5E-058.4E-059.3E-055.1E-056.7E-055.6E-058.4E-058.9E-065.8E-058.3E-060.6880.021*
A_0097NADP+C00006HMDB002178.3E-059.0E-058.9E-057.0E-054.4E-055.7E-058.7E-053.8E-065.7E-051.3E-050.6540.045*
A_0096NADHC00004HMDB014871.9E-042.1E-042.3E-041.5E-041.5E-041.1E-042.1E-042.3E-051.3E-042.5E-050.6460.020*
A_0060UMPC00105HMDB002885.4E-041.1E-031.1E-035.4E-044.6E-047.5E-049.1E-043.3E-045.8E-041.5E-040.6410.220
A_00343-Phosphoglyceric acidC00197HMDB008076.6E-045.3E-044.7E-043.3E-043.7E-043.3E-045.5E-049.5E-053.4E-042.3E-050.6200.055
A_0028Glycerol 3-phosphateC00093HMDB001264.0E-033.4E-033.9E-032.4E-033.5E-031.0E-033.8E-032.9E-042.3E-031.3E-030.6120.178
A_0047Glucose 6-phosphateC00668, C01172, C00092HMDB014018.0E-051.0E-041.2E-045.8E-055.9E-056.4E-051.0E-042.0E-056.0E-052.9E-060.5980.072
A_0049Fructose 6-phosphateC00085HMDB001242.8E-051.8E-053.4E-051.7E-051.6E-051.3E-052.7E-057.9E-061.5E-052.0E-060.5740.122
A_0062Fructose 1,6-diphosphateC00354HMDB010584.7E-044.4E-047.2E-042.7E-043.0E-042.2E-045.4E-041.5E-042.7E-044.1E-050.4910.079
A_0086Taurocholic acidC05122HMDB000361.2E-041.7E-041.6E-043.1E-051.4E-05ND1.5E-043.1E-052.3E-051.2E-050.1500.010**

.

.

ND, not detected.

Table A2

Cationic metabolites detected from cerebrum in GF mice and Ex-GF mice.

IDHMT DB
Relative area of standard
Comparative analysis
Compound nameKEGG IDHMDB IDGF
Ex-GF
GF
Ex-GF
GF1GF2GF3Ex-GF1Ex-GF2Ex-GF3MeanSDMeanSDRatio1p-Value2
C_0003Trimethylamine N-oxideC01104HMDB009252.2E-051.6E-051.8E-058.9E-059.3E-056.4E-051.9E-053.4E-068.2E-051.5E-054.3900.015*
C_0074N5-EthylglutamineC010476.8E-055.5E-055.9E-051.6E-041.2E-041.5E-046.1E-056.6E-061.4E-042.4E-052.3610.022*
C_0123Cysteine glutathione disulfideHMDB006566.3E-042.1E-049.6E-058.1E-041.0E-031.9E-043.1E-042.8E-046.8E-044.4E-042.1730.299
C_0031CysC00097, C00736, C00793HMDB00574, HMDB034171.7E-035.6E-043.6E-042.6E-031.3E-037.3E-048.6E-047.1E-041.5E-039.5E-041.7900.381
C_00292-MethylserineC021154.4E-055.1E-055.2E-051.0E-047.7E-058.3E-054.9E-054.2E-068.7E-051.2E-051.7750.025*
C_00733-MethylhistidineC01152HMDB004795.4E-046.6E-046.5E-041.2E-039.5E-049.5E-046.1E-046.7E-051.0E-031.3E-041.6770.018*
C_0099CystineC00491, C01420HMDB001922.0E-05NDND2.9E-053.7E-05ND2.0E-05NA3.3E-055.5E-061.673NA
C_0018HypotaurineC00519HMDB009656.5E-044.2E-044.9E-049.5E-046.9E-047.4E-045.2E-041.2E-047.9E-041.4E-041.5240.059
C_0089TrpC00078, C00525, C00806HMDB009291.0E-039.8E-049.4E-041.3E-031.5E-031.5E-039.7E-042.7E-051.4E-031.1E-041.4800.015*
C_0035Pipecolic acidC00408HMDB00070, HMDB00716, HMDB059601.6E-041.6E-041.6E-042.2E-042.5E-042.3E-041.6E-047.4E-072.3E-041.3E-051.4440.010*
C_0044Thiaproline1.0E-035.9E-042.8E-041.1E-039.6E-045.4E-046.2E-043.6E-048.7E-043.0E-041.4050.410
C_0032NicotinamideC00153HMDB014067.3E-034.6E-035.5E-037.7E-038.9E-037.6E-035.8E-031.4E-038.0E-037.4E-041.3850.093
C_0109InosineC00294HMDB001951.5E-028.3E-036.6E-031.6E-021.7E-028.4E-031.0E-024.5E-031.4E-024.7E-031.3780.371
C_0079TyrC00082, C01536, C06420HMDB001583.3E-033.3E-033.8E-034.3E-035.0E-034.9E-033.5E-033.2E-044.8E-033.8E-041.3710.012*
C_0060Threo-β-Methyl aspartic acidC03618-9.4E-056.7E-056.6E-059.5E-051.1E-041.0E-047.6E-051.6E-051.0E-046.5E-061.3390.091
C_0072PheC00079, C02057, C02265HMDB001593.6E-033.9E-033.7E-034.9E-035.1E-034.9E-033.7E-031.4E-045.0E-031.4E-041.3300.000***
C_00531-Methyl-4-imidazoleacetic acidC05828HMDB028209.5E-057.5E-051.0E-041.1E-041.5E-049.5E-059.1E-051.5E-051.2E-042.8E-051.3190.209
C_0047HypoxanthineC00262HMDB001578.9E-035.6E-034.2E-039.7E-039.4E-035.0E-036.2E-032.4E-038.0E-032.6E-031.2920.431
C_0065GuanineC00242HMDB001322.1E-052.1E-051.9E-052.2E-053.1E-052.3E-052.0E-051.4E-062.6E-055.0E-061.2630.202
C_0045AspC00049, C00402, C16433HMDB00191, HMDB064832.7E-032.7E-032.7E-033.6E-033.4E-033.4E-032.7E-032.8E-053.4E-031.2E-041.2590.007**
C_0112GuanosineC00387HMDB001331.8E-031.1E-031.0E-031.8E-031.9E-031.2E-031.3E-034.1E-041.6E-033.9E-041.2330.405
C_0086SDMAHMDB033342.4E-052.4E-052.0E-052.8E-053.1E-052.4E-052.3E-052.2E-062.8E-053.7E-061.2150.139
C_0058SpermidineC00315HMDB012579.9E-049.4E-041.1E-031.0E-031.5E-031.2E-031.0E-031.0E-041.2E-032.6E-041.2000.308
C_0116Arg-Glu8.2E-067.6E-068.3E-068.3E-069.5E-061.1E-058.0E-063.5E-079.6E-061.3E-061.1940.167
C_0061GlnC00064, C00303, C00819HMDB00641, HMDB034237.0E-037.0E-037.3E-038.2E-038.2E-039.0E-037.1E-031.7E-048.5E-034.6E-041.1880.025*
C_00081-Methyl-2-pyrrolidoneC111181.2E-049.6E-051.0E-041.2E-041.1E-041.4E-041.1E-041.1E-051.2E-041.5E-051.1700.171
C_0019CytosineC00380HMDB006304.1E-063.1E-063.3E-064.2E-064.1E-063.9E-063.5E-065.4E-074.1E-061.8E-071.1520.220
C_00132-Aminoisobutyric acidC03665HMDB019069.8E-051.2E-049.4E-051.3E-041.1E-041.2E-041.0E-041.3E-051.2E-047.3E-061.1410.177
C_0094CarnosineC00386HMDB000332.4E-032.4E-032.3E-033.0E-032.9E-032.2E-032.4E-037.3E-052.7E-034.6E-041.1400.340
C_0021UracilC00106HMDB003003.3E-042.9E-042.6E-043.8E-043.6E-042.6E-042.9E-043.9E-053.3E-046.0E-051.1390.392
C_0093CystathionineC00542, C02291HMDB000996.6E-044.4E-046.6E-045.7E-048.3E-046.0E-045.9E-041.2E-046.7E-041.4E-041.1370.497
C_0067HisC00135, C00768, C06419HMDB001775.5E-035.9E-035.4E-036.1E-036.1E-036.8E-035.6E-032.5E-046.3E-034.3E-041.1350.071
C_0100HomocarnosineC00884HMDB007455.1E-034.7E-035.5E-035.4E-036.4E-035.6E-035.1E-034.3E-045.8E-035.4E-041.1300.173
C_0014CholineC00114HMDB000972.3E-022.0E-021.4E-022.7E-022.3E-021.4E-021.9E-024.6E-032.1E-026.3E-031.1180.643
C_0020HistamineC00388HMDB008702.5E-052.5E-053.0E-052.3E-054.1E-052.6E-052.7E-053.2E-063.0E-059.3E-061.1160.630
C_0046AdenineC00147HMDB000343.6E-042.9E-042.5E-043.2E-043.9E-042.9E-043.0E-045.4E-053.3E-045.1E-051.1140.470
C_0122S-Adenosyl methionineC00019HMDB011854.9E-044.4E-045.2E-045.2E-045.5E-045.4E-044.8E-044.1E-055.4E-041.8E-051.1140.134
C_0030Betaine aldehyde + H2OC00576HMDB012521.7E-051.4E-051.2E-051.9E-051.5E-051.3E-051.5E-052.6E-061.6E-053.0E-061.1080.532
C_00341-MethylhistamineC05127HMDB008987.1E-054.2E-056.7E-055.6E-057.7E-056.6E-056.0E-051.6E-056.6E-051.1E-051.1040.610
C_0114Argininosuccinic acidC03406HMDB000522.0E-041.9E-041.8E-041.9E-042.1E-042.2E-041.9E-049.3E-062.1E-041.7E-051.0990.191
C_0078SerotoninC00780HMDB002594.4E-054.4E-054.4E-053.6E-056.4E-054.5E-054.4E-053.1E-074.8E-051.4E-051.0990.649
C_0103UridineC00299HMDB002961.5E-031.2E-031.2E-031.4E-031.6E-031.3E-031.3E-031.8E-041.4E-031.8E-041.0960.443
C_0087SpermineC00750HMDB012567.6E-059.7E-057.7E-058.6E-057.9E-051.1E-048.3E-051.2E-059.1E-051.4E-051.0910.524
C_0002GlyC00037HMDB001232.1E-021.7E-021.6E-021.9E-022.4E-021.7E-021.8E-022.3E-032.0E-023.7E-031.0900.563
C_0076ArgC00062, C00792HMDB00517, HMDB034168.6E-036.7E-038.8E-038.3E-039.4E-038.5E-038.0E-031.2E-038.7E-036.2E-041.0870.429
C_0023ProC00148, C00763, C16435HMDB00162, HMDB034116.6E-036.2E-036.3E-037.5E-036.7E-036.4E-036.4E-032.3E-046.9E-035.8E-041.0760.280
C_0063MetC00073, C00855, C01733HMDB006961.9E-031.7E-032.2E-032.1E-032.0E-032.1E-031.9E-032.2E-042.1E-034.5E-051.0750.375
C_0113His-Glu3.9E-063.0E-06N.D.3.7E-063.5E-064.0E-063.5E-066.4E-073.7E-062.8E-071.0680.695
C_0071Methionine sulfoxideC02989HMDB020052.5E-041.8E-042.7E-042.1E-042.9E-042.5E-042.3E-044.7E-052.5E-044.2E-051.0670.691
C_0108AdenosineC00212HMDB000502.3E-022.2E-022.3E-022.5E-022.3E-022.4E-022.2E-029.2E-042.4E-025.6E-041.0620.102
C_0005β-AlaC00099HMDB000562.2E-031.9E-032.1E-031.8E-032.6E-032.1E-032.1E-031.8E-042.2E-033.9E-041.0620.650
C_0105γ-Glu-CysC00669HMDB010491.3E-041.1E-041.3E-041.6E-041.2E-041.2E-041.2E-041.5E-051.3E-042.1E-051.0600.650
C_0110SaccharopineC00449HMDB002793.8E-043.5E-043.7E-042.9E-044.9E-043.7E-043.7E-041.7E-053.9E-041.0E-041.0580.754
C_0082N6-AcetyllysineC02727HMDB002062.8E-052.3E-053.0E-052.9E-053.0E-052.7E-052.7E-053.9E-062.9E-051.8E-061.0530.605
C_0015GABAC00334HMDB001125.7E-034.6E-034.9E-034.4E-036.2E-035.3E-035.1E-035.9E-045.3E-039.1E-041.0480.722
C_00682-Aminoadipic acidC00956HMDB005101.5E-031.9E-032.0E-031.8E-031.7E-032.2E-031.8E-032.7E-041.9E-032.9E-041.0480.726
C_0040AsnC00152, C01905, C16438HMDB001683.4E-033.5E-033.7E-033.8E-033.6E-033.6E-033.5E-031.7E-043.7E-031.3E-041.0460.275
C_0097Thr-Asp1.2E-051.4E-051.1E-051.1E-051.4E-051.4E-051.2E-051.5E-061.3E-052.0E-061.0450.721
C_0075N-AcetylornithineC00437HMDB033571.3E-058.3E-06ND1.1E-05NDND1.1E-053.5E-061.1E-05NA1.043NA
C_0025BetaineC00719HMDB000439.6E-048.3E-049.5E-049.2E-041.1E-038.3E-049.1E-047.0E-059.5E-041.4E-041.0420.696
C_0010Homoserine lactone7.8E-056.8E-058.0E-057.3E-057.7E-058.4E-057.5E-056.9E-067.8E-055.6E-061.0320.660
C_0107ThiamineC00378HMDB002356.8E-056.0E-055.3E-056.7E-056.2E-055.8E-056.0E-057.7E-066.2E-054.7E-061.0290.753
C_01111-MethyladenosineC02494HMDB033319.6E-051.1E-041.5E-041.2E-041.2E-041.2E-041.2E-042.6E-051.2E-043.8E-061.0280.850
C_0064TriethanolamineC067711.1E-051.2E-051.4E-051.5E-051.2E-051.2E-051.2E-051.5E-061.3E-051.6E-061.0280.799
C_0026ValC00183, C06417, C16436HMDB008838.5E-037.5E-037.5E-037.8E-038.2E-038.0E-037.8E-035.5E-048.0E-031.9E-041.0220.653
C_0056AcetylcholineC01996HMDB008954.5E-045.0E-046.0E-044.8E-044.9E-046.1E-045.2E-047.8E-055.3E-047.3E-051.0210.869
C_01155′-Deoxy-5′-methyl thioadenosineC00170HMDB011731.9E-051.6E-051.7E-052.1E-051.6E-051.6E-051.8E-051.3E-061.8E-052.9E-061.0160.891
C_0054StachydrineC10172HMDB048271.3E-049.7E-051.4E-041.5E-041.3E-048.6E-051.2E-042.2E-051.2E-043.4E-051.0140.946
C_0085Gly-Asp--8.2E-059.0E-058.5E-051.0E-048.4E-057.3E-058.6E-054.3E-068.6E-051.4E-051.0090.935
C_0039LeuC00123, C01570, C16439HMDB006879.5E-038.3E-038.4E-038.9E-039.0E-038.4E-038.7E-037.0E-048.8E-033.1E-041.0040.941
C_0080PhosphorylcholineC00588HMDB015651.6E-021.6E-021.8E-021.6E-021.6E-021.6E-021.6E-021.1E-031.6E-022.3E-040.9940.891
C_0036trans-Glutaconic acidC02214HMDB006209.0E-059.7E-059.9E-057.7E-051.1E-049.7E-059.5E-054.7E-069.4E-051.7E-050.9920.945
C_0090Carboxymethyl lysine5.5E-055.2E-055.2E-055.1E-055.7E-055.0E-055.3E-052.1E-065.2E-053.7E-060.9890.818
C_00952′-DeoxycytidineC00881HMDB000143.3E-052.2E-052.6E-053.5E-052.7E-051.9E-052.7E-055.6E-062.7E-057.8E-060.9880.955
C_0038IleC00407, C06418, C16434HMDB001724.8E-034.2E-034.1E-034.4E-034.3E-034.3E-034.4E-034.1E-044.3E-036.2E-050.9870.841
C_00122-Aminobutyric acidC02261, C02356HMDB004521.7E-041.4E-041.7E-041.7E-041.5E-041.6E-041.6E-042.0E-051.6E-047.1E-060.9870.879
C_0062GluC00025, C00217, C00302HMDB00148, HMDB033391.4E-021.4E-021.5E-021.4E-021.3E-021.5E-021.4E-024.6E-041.4E-026.3E-040.9870.698
C_0022CreatinineC00791HMDB005626.6E-045.9E-046.5E-045.6E-046.3E-046.7E-046.3E-044.0E-056.2E-045.5E-050.9780.745
C_0083Gly-LeuC02155HMDB007591.5E-041.4E-041.5E-041.6E-041.4E-041.3E-041.5E-049.7E-061.4E-041.4E-050.9780.759
C_0059LysC00047, C00739, C16440HMDB00182, HMDB034051.1E-029.5E-031.0E-029.8E-031.1E-021.0E-021.0E-028.8E-041.0E-024.4E-040.9770.702
C_0084N6,N6,N6-TrimethyllysineC03793HMDB013253.4E-044.3E-044.1E-044.0E-043.3E-044.2E-043.9E-044.7E-053.8E-044.7E-050.9770.823
C_0104Pyridoxamine 5′-phosphateC00647HMDB015553.4E-043.5E-043.7E-043.2E-043.7E-043.5E-043.5E-041.4E-053.5E-042.4E-050.9760.641
C_0117Glutathione (GSSG)_divalentC00127HMDB033371.8E-022.0E-021.7E-021.7E-022.1E-021.6E-021.9E-021.4E-031.8E-022.7E-030.9730.794
C_0092N-AcetylglucosamineC00140HMDB002151.5E-041.6E-041.4E-041.6E-041.5E-041.3E-041.5E-046.8E-061.5E-041.3E-050.9710.639
C_0069CarnitineC00318, C00487, C15025HMDB000628.6E-037.7E-037.9E-037.4E-039.0E-037.1E-038.1E-034.9E-047.8E-031.0E-030.9690.736
C_0001UreaC00086HMDB002947.5E-027.4E-027.7E-027.0E-027.3E-027.5E-027.5E-021.6E-037.3E-022.7E-030.9680.274
C_0042CreatineC00300HMDB000642.2E-022.2E-022.3E-022.1E-022.1E-022.2E-022.2E-024.4E-042.1E-023.2E-040.9650.078
C_0051TyramineC00483HMDB003061.2E-051.0E-052.0E-051.1E-051.5E-051.3E-051.4E-055.0E-061.3E-052.0E-060.9620.878
C_0007AlaC00041, C00133, C01401HMDB00161, HMDB013101.1E-031.2E-031.2E-031.3E-039.6E-041.2E-031.2E-034.3E-051.1E-031.6E-040.9600.667
C_0077CitrullineC00327HMDB009041.1E-031.0E-031.1E-031.2E-038.2E-041.1E-031.1E-036.9E-051.0E-031.9E-040.9590.735
C_0004PutrescineC00134HMDB014141.2E-049.7E-051.0E-049.5E-051.0E-041.0E-041.1E-041.2E-051.0E-044.7E-060.9510.544
C_0106Glycero phosphocholineC00670HMDB000861.8E-021.9E-022.1E-021.3E-022.1E-022.0E-021.9E-021.5E-031.8E-024.2E-030.9470.725
C_0027HomoserineC00263HMDB007192.3E-042.6E-042.7E-042.6E-042.2E-042.4E-042.5E-042.0E-052.4E-041.8E-050.9400.379
C_00554-Guanidinobutyric acidC01035HMDB034643.3E-042.6E-043.3E-043.0E-043.0E-042.5E-043.1E-044.4E-052.8E-043.3E-050.9290.534
C_0119Thiamine phosphateC01081HMDB026665.2E-054.8E-054.1E-054.3E-054.8E-053.9E-054.7E-055.6E-064.4E-054.4E-060.9240.436
C_0043OrnithineC00077, C00515, C01602HMDB00214, HMDB033743.4E-042.7E-044.3E-043.5E-042.8E-043.2E-043.5E-047.7E-053.2E-043.5E-050.9170.597
C_0102CytidineC00475HMDB000892.0E-031.8E-031.6E-032.1E-031.4E-031.4E-031.8E-032.2E-041.6E-034.1E-040.8910.520
C_0033TaurineC00245HMDB002512.8E-023.0E-023.2E-022.8E-022.4E-022.7E-023.0E-021.8E-032.7E-022.5E-030.8850.128
C_0028ThrC00188, C00820HMDB001671.8E-021.8E-021.9E-021.4E-021.6E-021.7E-021.8E-024.3E-041.6E-021.3E-030.8840.101
C_0118Glutathione (GSH)C00051HMDB001255.6E-036.1E-037.3E-035.5E-034.2E-036.7E-036.3E-038.6E-045.5E-031.2E-030.8740.422
C_0121S-Adenosylhomo cysteineC00021HMDB009396.8E-057.6E-057.7E-056.7E-056.7E-055.9E-057.4E-055.0E-066.4E-054.8E-060.8740.080
C_0091β-Ala-LysC053413.4E-052.4E-053.8E-052.4E-053.6E-052.4E-053.2E-057.1E-062.8E-057.0E-060.8730.521
C_0024Guanidoacetic acidC00581HMDB001284.6E-043.8E-044.2E-044.0E-043.4E-043.3E-044.2E-044.1E-053.6E-043.8E-050.8550.131
C_0057γ-ButyrobetaineC01181HMDB011611.8E-031.7E-031.8E-031.6E-031.3E-031.5E-031.8E-033.1E-051.5E-031.3E-040.8410.059
C_0017N-MethylanilineC02299ND1.6E-051.5E-051.1E-051.4E-05ND1.5E-059.7E-071.3E-052.2E-060.8340.325
C_00705-HydroxylysineC16741HMDB004501.4E-051.0E-051.2E-051.1E-057.4E-061.1E-051.2E-051.8E-061.0E-052.3E-060.8310.295
C_0096γ-Glu-2-aminobutyric acid1.7E-041.6E-042.0E-041.5E-041.6E-041.3E-041.8E-041.9E-051.5E-041.3E-050.8290.090
C_0088O-AcetylcarnitineC02571HMDB002015.0E-042.9E-044.6E-043.8E-043.3E-043.1E-044.2E-041.1E-043.4E-043.4E-050.8160.370
C_0041Gly-GlyC02037HMDB117331.2E-041.4E-041.5E-041.1E-041.0E-041.2E-041.4E-041.3E-051.1E-041.1E-050.8040.053
C_01015,6,7,8-TetrahydrobiopterinC00272HMDB00027N.D.1.3E-051.5E-057.9E-061.2E-051.4E-051.4E-051.6E-061.1E-053.1E-060.7940.264
C_0016SerC00065, C00716, C00740HMDB00187, HMDB034069.8E-041.1E-031.1E-038.2E-047.3E-048.3E-041.0E-036.5E-057.9E-045.5E-050.7590.007**
C_0081N8-AcetylspermidineC01029HMDB021895.6E-054.6E-054.6E-053.9E-053.5E-053.6E-054.9E-056.0E-063.7E-052.0E-060.7460.056
C_0050TrigonellineC01004HMDB008751.4E-049.8E-051.2E-041.0E-048.2E-057.4E-051.2E-041.8E-058.7E-051.6E-050.7380.095
C_00481-MethylnicotinamideC02918HMDB006994.5E-055.3E-055.4E-054.3E-053.4E-053.4E-055.0E-055.2E-063.7E-055.0E-060.7360.033*
C_0098Ser-Glu5.0E-054.1E-055.0E-053.5E-053.8E-052.9E-054.7E-055.5E-063.4E-054.8E-060.7290.040*
C_0052Urocanic acidC00785HMDB003011.0E-043.6E-054.4E-054.1E-056.9E-051.2E-056.0E-053.5E-054.1E-052.8E-050.6770.503
C_0037HydroxyprolineC01015, C01157HMDB06055, HMDB007251.6E-031.7E-031.6E-031.2E-039.9E-041.0E-031.6E-033.2E-051.1E-031.1E-040.6510.009**
C_0009CyclohexylamineC005711.5E-051.9E-052.3E-051.4E-058.5E-061.4E-051.9E-054.1E-061.2E-053.4E-060.6470.094
C_0120S-LactoylglutathioneC03451HMDB01066NDND1.8E-05NDND1.0E-051.8E-05NA1.0E-05NA0.584NA
C_0066DopamineC03758HMDB000732.9E-045.8E-047.1E-042.4E-042.7E-043.5E-045.3E-042.2E-042.9E-045.6E-050.5430.188

.

.

ND, not detected.

Table 1

Metabolites whose concentrations were higher in the cerebral metabolome of Ex-GF mice than in that of GF mice.

Compound nameCategoryMean
SD
Ratio
GFEx-GFGFEx-GFEx-GF/GF
Trimethylamine N-oxideAlkylamino acid1.87E-058.20E-053.37E-061.53E-054.39*
N5-EthylglutamineAlkylamino acid6.06E-051.43E-046.62E-062.43E-052.36*
Cysteine glutathione disulfidePeptide3.12E-046.78E-042.78E-044.36E-042.17
2,3-Diphosphoglyceric acid8.67E-051.61E-042.73E-053.98E-051.85p < 0.1
CysAmino acid8.61E-041.54E-037.09E-049.51E-041.79
2-Methylserine4.90E-058.70E-054.25E-061.25E-051.78*
3-MethylhistidineAlkylamino acid6.14E-041.03E-036.71E-051.34E-041.68*
CystinePeptide1.96E-053.28E-05NA5.53E-061.67
TrpAmino acid9.74E-041.44E-032.74E-051.13E-041.48*
Pipecolic acid1.61E-042.33E-047.37E-071.28E-051.44*
TyrAmino acid3.47E-034.75E-033.16E-043.81E-041.37*
PheAmino acid3.74E-034.97E-031.44E-041.38E-041.33***
AspAmino acid2.72E-033.43E-032.78E-051.20E-041.26**
Ribose 5-phosphateEnergy1.11E-041.32E-043.22E-069.09E-061.19*
GlnAmino acid7.12E-038.46E-031.74E-044.57E-041.19*

*.

These metabolites have significant or more than 1.6-fold difference between GF mice and Ex-GF.

Table 2

Metabolites whose concentrations were lower in the cerebral metabolome of Ex-GF mice than in that of GF mice.

Compound nameCategoryMean
SD
Ratio
GFEx-GFGFEx-GFEx-GF/GF
N-Acetylneuraminic acidAlkylamino acid1.03E-038.75E-044.35E-055.59E-050.85*
N-Acetylaspartic acidNeuron transmitter2.06E-011.72E-011.04E-028.54E-030.84*
Pantothenic acidCo-enzyme4.37E-043.58E-042.08E-053.18E-050.82*
BiotinCo-enzyme2.22E-041.79E-041.66E-051.83E-050.80*
SerAmino acid1.05E-037.95E-046.49E-055.53E-050.76**
ADPNucleic acid5.09E-033.85E-035.37E-041.32E-040.76*
1-MethylnicotinamideAlkylamino acid5.04E-053.71E-055.17E-065.00E-060.74*
Ser-GluPeptide4.69E-053.42E-055.47E-064.85E-060.73*
Succinic acidEnergy2.01E-021.45E-021.25E-031.68E-030.72*
3-Phenylpropionic acid1.23E-048.80E-051.30E-059.03E-060.71*
Dihydroxyacetone phosphateEnergy2.02E-041.40E-041.23E-052.27E-050.69*
IMPNucleic acid2.67E-031.84E-031.70E-042.63E-040.69*
2-Hydroxybutyric acid8.39E-055.77E-058.91E-068.28E-060.69*
NADP+Co-enzyme8.69E-055.68E-053.79E-061.27E-050.65*
HydroxyprolineAmino acid1.64E-031.07E-033.18E-051.14E-040.65**
NADHCo-enzyme2.09E-041.35E-042.26E-052.52E-050.65*
3-Phosphoglyceric acid5.54E-043.44E-049.54E-052.31E-050.62p < 0.1
Glycerol 3-phosphate3.77E-032.31E-032.93E-041.27E-030.61
Glucose 6-phosphateEnergy1.01E-046.03E-052.05E-052.93E-060.60p < 0.1
Fructose 6-phosphateEnergy2.68E-051.54E-057.92E-062.03E-060.57
DopamineNeuron transmitter5.26E-042.85E-042.16E-045.60E-050.54
Fructose 1,6-diphosphateEnergy5.43E-042.67E-041.52E-044.13E-050.49p < 0.1
Taurocholic acidBile acid1.51E-042.26E-053.08E-051.17E-050.15**

*.

These metabolites have significant or more than 1.6-fold difference between GF mice and Ex-GF.

Metabolites whose concentrations were higher in the cerebral metabolome of Ex-GF mice than in that of GF mice. *. These metabolites have significant or more than 1.6-fold difference between GF mice and Ex-GF. Metabolites whose concentrations were lower in the cerebral metabolome of Ex-GF mice than in that of GF mice. *. These metabolites have significant or more than 1.6-fold difference between GF mice and Ex-GF.

Influence of intestinal microbiota on cerebral glycolytic metabolism

The relative quantities of the annotated metabolites in the principal metabolic pathways are represented as bar graphs (Figure 2). The concentrations of metabolites involved in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways are characteristically higher in GF mice than in Ex-GF mice. Therefore, we focused our work on cerebral glycolytic metabolism (Figure 3A). The concentration of ADP and NADH were significantly (p < 0.05) higher, while there was a tendency for concentrations of ATP, AMP, and NAD+ to be higher in GF mice than Ex-GF mice. The NADH/NAD+ ratio tended to be lower in GF mice than in Ex-GF mice (Figure 3B). There was no difference in the expression of the hexokinase and phosphofructokinase genes, between GF mice and Ex-GF mice (Figure 3C).
Figure 2

Differences of cerebral metabolites between GF mice and Ex-GF mice on the principal metabolic pathways. The relative quantities of the annotated metabolites are represented as bar graphs (blue, GF: red, Ex-GF). Metabolites surrounded by blue and red circles are of higher and lower concentrations, respectively, in GF mice than Ex-GF mice. ND, not detected.

Figure 3

Comparison of glycolytic metabolic activity between GF mice and Ex-GF mice. (A) The relative quantities of the annotated metabolites are represented as bar graphs (blue, GF: red, Ex-GF). (B) Relative quantities of ATP, ADP, AMP, and nicotinamides (*p < 0.05). (C) Cerebral gene expression of hexokinase and phosphofructokinase. Data are represented as mean ± SD (A,B) and mean ± SEM (C).

Differences of cerebral metabolites between GF mice and Ex-GF mice on the principal metabolic pathways. The relative quantities of the annotated metabolites are represented as bar graphs (blue, GF: red, Ex-GF). Metabolites surrounded by blue and red circles are of higher and lower concentrations, respectively, in GF mice than Ex-GF mice. ND, not detected. Comparison of glycolytic metabolic activity between GF mice and Ex-GF mice. (A) The relative quantities of the annotated metabolites are represented as bar graphs (blue, GF: red, Ex-GF). (B) Relative quantities of ATP, ADP, AMP, and nicotinamides (*p < 0.05). (C) Cerebral gene expression of hexokinase and phosphofructokinase. Data are represented as mean ± SD (A,B) and mean ± SEM (C).

Comparison of individual differences in metabolome between colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum

Relative standard deviations (RSD% = value of standard deviation/value of mean × 100) of metabolites in the colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum of GF and Ex-GF mice are shown in Figure 4. The RSD value of metabolites in the cerebrum was similar between GF and Ex-GF mice. However, in Ex-GF mice, the RSD values in cardiac plasma (p = 0.10) and colonic luminal content (p < 0.001) were larger than in GF mice. In addition, in Ex-GF mice, the RSD values were the highest for colonic content (vs. cardiac plasma, p < 0.01), followed by cardiac plasma (vs. the cerebrum, p < 0.05) and the cerebrum. In contrast, in GF mice, the RSD value did not differ between colonic content and cardiac plasma, although that of cardiac plasma was greater than that of the cerebrum (p < 0.05).
Figure 4

The boxplot of RSD% of all metabolites detected from colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Blue cross bars represent the comparison of means between Ex-GF mice and GF mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (GF vs. Ex-GF).

The boxplot of RSD% of all metabolites detected from colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Blue cross bars represent the comparison of means between Ex-GF mice and GF mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (GF vs. Ex-GF).

Comparisons of metabolites between colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum

We compared the 38 metabolites, which were significantly altered between the cerebrum of GF and Ex-GF mice. The relative quantitative ratio (Ex-GF/GF value) for the expression of each metabolite in colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum are shown in Figure 5. Six metabolites, which are shown in red, had similar Ex-GF/GF ratios in all three sites. Although detected in the cerebrum, 12 metabolites, which are shown in blue, were below the detection limit in cardiac plasma. A total of 16 metabolites, which are marked by the “#” symbol, had different Ex-GF/GF ratios between the cerebrum and cardiac plasma. The Ex-GF/GF ratios of all other metabolites did not differ between the three specimens.
Figure 5

Relative quantitative ratio (Ex-GF/GF value) comparisons of 38 metabolites between GF mice and Ex-GF mice, colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Metabolites shown in red have similar Ex-GF/GF ratios between the colonic lumen, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Metabolites shown in blue are below the detection limit in cardiac plasma, but were detected in the cerebrum. #These metabolites differed in Ex-GF/GF ratios between the cerebrum and cardiac plasma. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (GF vs. Ex-GF). ND, not detected.

Relative quantitative ratio (Ex-GF/GF value) comparisons of 38 metabolites between GF mice and Ex-GF mice, colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Metabolites shown in red have similar Ex-GF/GF ratios between the colonic lumen, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Metabolites shown in blue are below the detection limit in cardiac plasma, but were detected in the cerebrum. #These metabolites differed in Ex-GF/GF ratios between the cerebrum and cardiac plasma. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (GF vs. Ex-GF). ND, not detected. Bacterial compositions were analyzed using FLX systems and the results are shown in Figure 6. Phylum Firmicutes (80%) and phylum Bacteroidetes (about 6%) have been identified as dominant populations in all samples. Following detailed classification on the family level, the families Lactobacillaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Clostridiaceae, and Bacteroidaceae were commonly detected and constituted higher proportions in the population, i.e., 50–70, 3–10, 2–5, and 2–4% respectively, than other families. However, there were only small individual differences among the samples. These families accounted for up to 60–70% of the total bacterial population.
Figure 6

Aggregate microbiota composition at the phylum and family levels in the colonic content of Ex-GF mice.

Aggregate microbiota composition at the phylum and family levels in the colonic content of Ex-GF mice.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, in a prior study by Fu et al. (2011), the highest numbers of metabolites from brain tissue to date were detected using GC-MS. In total, 118 metabolites were routinely detected in more than 80% of samples in one or more of three species (human, chimpanzee, or rhesus macaques), in at least one brain region (prefrontal or cerebellar cortex). However, only 61 metabolites were annotated. CE-TOFMS identified 196 metabolites from the cerebral metabolome, indicating that CE-TOFMS is more sensitive than GC-MS for comprehensive and large-scale metabolomic analysis in the brain.

Neurotransmitters and several metabolites which are involved in brain function

Concentration of dopamine (DA), a target for amphetamine stimulation of locomotor activity and stereotyped behaviors, was approximately twofold higher (p = 0.188) in GF mice than in Ex-GF mice. This is consistent with the findings that GF mice display increased motor activity and reduced anxiety compared with their Ex-CF counterparts (Heijtz et al., 2011; Neufeld et al., 2011). It is confusing that the concentration of Tyr in the cerebrum of Ex-GF mice was higher than that of GF mice, since Tyr is a precursor of DA. Tyr hydroxylase hydroxylates Tyr to l-DOPA, which was below the detection limit in this study. DOPA is further converted to DA by aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (Daubner et al., 2011). Therefore, this indicates that cerebral DA synthesis is induced by DA-producing enzymes, which are inhibited by stimulation of intestinal microbiota through the MGB axis (Figure 7A). Parkinson disease is characterized by a progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Since the activity level of Tyr hydroxylase is associated with Parkinson disease (Haavik and Toska, 1998), it is possible that the intestinal microbiota is involved in the development of Parkinson disease.
Figure 7

Relative quantitative comparisons of metabolites in the biosynthetic pathway for dopamine (A) and serotonin (B), in the cerebrum of GF mice and Ex-GF mice. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (GF vs. Ex-GF).

Relative quantitative comparisons of metabolites in the biosynthetic pathway for dopamine (A) and serotonin (B), in the cerebrum of GF mice and Ex-GF mice. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (GF vs. Ex-GF). We were also surprised to find that the concentrations of Trp, precursors of serotonin (5-HT), in the cerebrum of Ex-GF mice were higher than that of GF mice. This was despite the fact that cerebral 5-HT concentration did not differ between GF mice and Ex-GF mice (Figure 7B). It is believed that brain 5-HT concentration is dependent on the brain Trp level (Fernstrom, 2005). Plasma Trp are transported into the brain by a transporter, located at BBB on CNS capillary endothelial cells (Pardridge, 1998), and converted to 5-HT in neurons containing Trp hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-HT synthesis (Jequier et al., 1967). Therefore, we suppose that cerebral 5-HT synthesis is regulated by Trp hydroxylase in neurons without the influence of the cerebral Trp pool and/or intestinal microbiota under the non-stressed condition and in non-neonates, as in our present study. Several metabolites, which are known to be involved in brain function, are also influenced by normal intestinal microbiota. N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA), which is in group GF > Ex-GF, is an amino acid present in the vertebrate brain that is synthesized and stored primarily in neurons and considered a marker for neuronal health and attenuation (Simmons et al., 1991; Jenkins et al., 2000). Pipecolic acid, which is in the GF < Ex-GF group, is known as a neuromodulator or neurotransmitter with the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic transmission. Pipecolic acid was shown to be region- and site-specific in the CNS (Kase et al., 1980), which causes hepatic encephalopathy by inducing neuronal cell death, or apoptosis, rather than by depressing neurotransmissions (Matsumoto et al., 2003). Ser was in the GF > Ex-GF group; d-Ser is synthesized from l-Ser by serine racemase (CE-TOFMS could not separate d-Ser and l-Ser) in the human brain. It functions as an obligatory co-agonist at the glycine modulatory site of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-selective glutamate receptors. Thus, depletion of d-Ser levels has been implicated in NMDA receptor hypofunction, which is thought to occur in schizophrenia (Yang et al., 2010). N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA), which was in group GF > Ex-GF, increased learning and memory performance (Wang et al., 2007). These findings indicate that intestinal microbiota are closely related to brain health, disease development, attenuation, learning, and memory.

Cerebral energy metabolism

The concentration of several cerebral glycolysis intermediates was higher in GF mice than in Ex-GF mice (Figure 3A). This raises the following two possibilities: first, the cerebral energy consumption of Ex-GF mice is higher than that of GF mice, and second, that cerebral energy production by glycolysis in Ex-GF mice is lower than in GF mice. However, these phenomena presumably indicate an accelerated molecular flux of the glycolysis pathway to compensate for ATP and NADH depletion in the cerebrum of Ex-GF mice. This assumption is based on our finding that the cerebral ATP (Ex-GF/GF ratio = 0.91) and NADH (Ex-GF/GF ratio = 0.65) levels were lower in Ex-GF mice than GF mice (Figure 3B) and there was no difference in cerebral hexokinase and phosphofructokinase gene expression between mice (Figure 3C). In fact, levels of acetyl CoA, which is produced by oxidation from pyruvic acid, was similar in the cerebrum of GF and Ex-GF mice. Furthermore, a significant difference in lactic acid was not observed, suggesting that the normal intestinal microbiota do not influence anaerobic respiration and the compensated molecular components (ATP or NADH) of the glycolysis pathway in Ex-GF mice was then transferred into the TCA cycle for further aerobic respiration via acetyl CoA in the cerebral mitochondria. To support the presence of an active TCA cycle, we also report changes in NADH and NAD+. The ratio between NADH and NAD+ affects mitochondrial TCA cycle activity (LaNoue et al., 1972). NADH and NADH/NAD+ ratio in Ex-GF mice were reduced to 65 and 92% of those in GF mice, respectively. Since both values are known to increase when the TCA cycle is blocked (Sugiura et al., 2011), the observed reductions in NADH and NADH/NAD+ ratio suggest normal intestinal microbiota induces active oxidative phosphorylation via the TCA cycle. From these findings, we suggest that, in the cerebrum, Ex-GF mice consume energy and accelerate energy production through glycolysis and TCA cycle more highly than GF mice. In other word, the cerebrum of Ex-GF mice is more active than that of GF mice.

Bacterial potential influence on cerebrum metabolic changes

Of 38 metabolites influenced by intestinal microbiota, 12 metabolites detected from the cerebrum but not cardiac plasma, are synthesized independently in the cerebrum and are influenced by MGB axis (Figure 5, metabolites shown in blue). Sixteen metabolites whose Ex-GF/GF ratio differed between the cerebrum and cardiac plasma are influenced by MGB axis and/or BBB (Figure 5, metabolites marked by #). The fact that NANA is in this group is in conflict existing literature. In animal infant models, exogenous administration of NANA increased learning and memory performance as well as the concentration of NANA in the frontal cortex (Carlson and House, 1986; Wang et al., 2007). However, in the present study, NANA produced by intestinal microbiota was not transported to the blood. Therefore, it is doubtful whether dietary NANA influences the brain and behavior directly. We suppose that improvement of learning and memory performance by oral administration of NANA depends on the stimulation of intestinal microbiota, which is altered by supplements containing NANA through the MBG axis. Cerebral GABA concentration did not differ between GF mice and Ex-GF mice, although remarkable differences were observed in GABA cardiac plasma concentrations between GF mice and Ex-GF mice (Figure 8). This indicates that GABA is controlled by BBB and tightly regulated in the cerebrum. This questions the suitability of oral GABA supplementation studies to provide GABA to the brain.
Figure 8

Relative quantitative comparisons of GABA in colonic lumen content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01.

Relative quantitative comparisons of GABA in colonic lumen content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01. Differences in RSD values between GF mice and Ex-GF mice (Figure 4) implies that individual differences in the metabolites found in the colonic content and cardiac plasma of Ex-GF mice is influenced by the diversity of intestinal microbiota (Matsumoto et al., 2012). Furthermore, these findings indicate that many metabolites produced by intestinal bacteria are filtrated and transported to brain via the blood through the BBB. However, six cerebral metabolites (Figure 5, metabolites shown in red) had similar Ex-GF/GF ratios between colonic luminal content, cardiac plasma, and the cerebrum. This may suggest that these metabolites may be transported from the colonic lumen to the cerebrum in the bloodstream without filtration by BBB. Further studies are required to fully understand how these metabolites are transported from the gut lumen to blood and from blood to the brain. Furthermore, the relationship between intestinal bacterial composition and brain metabolome is an area that clearly merits further study in the future. These discussions center on a comparison between general knowledge and the data obtained in the present study. However, the neuronal effects of almost detected metabolites in the cerebrum are unclear. In future studies, researchers in various fields may find evidence that some of the newly identified metabolites are important for neuronal activities and diseases. Indeed, there is a possibility of detecting site-specific metabolome profiles when using CE-TOFMS. Further studies are required to analyze other parts of the brain. In this study, many metabolites including neurotransmitters showed differences in the concentrations between GF mice and Ex-GF mice, indicating that normal intestinal microbiota closely connected with brain health and disease, development, attenuation, learning, memory, and behavior. We propose that through proper control of intestinal microbiota, cerebral nerve disorders may be prevented or alleviated in the future.

Conflict of Interest Statement

This work was supported by the BRAIN, Japan. This work was also funded by Kyodo Milk Industry Co. Ltd and Human Metabolome Technologies, Inc. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Mitsuharu Matsumoto and Emiko Sawaki are employes of Kyodo Milk Industry Co. Ltd. and had a role in study design, data analysis, preparation of the manuscript, and decision to publish the manuscript. Takushi Ooga is employe of Human Metabolome Technologies, Inc. and had a role in data analysis and decision to publish the manuscript. All of the other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

Mitsuharu Matsumoto wrote the paper. Mitsuharu Matsumoto, Yasuhiro Koga, and Yoshimi Benno designed this study. Yuji Aiba performed animal experiments. Takushi Ooga analyzed the metabolome. Mitsuharu Matsumoto, Ryoko Kibe, Takushi Ooga, and Emiko Sawaki analyzed the data, discussed findings, and helped draft the manuscript.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Metabolome analysis by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Maria Rowena N Monton; Tomoyoshi Soga
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 2.  Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour.

Authors:  John F Cryan; Timothy G Dinan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Nonlinear decrease over time in N-acetyl aspartate levels in the absence of neuronal loss and increases in glutamine and glucose in transgenic Huntington's disease mice.

Authors:  B G Jenkins; P Klivenyi; E Kustermann; O A Andreassen; R J Ferrante; B R Rosen; M F Beal
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.372

4.  Rapid metabolic evolution in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Xing Fu; Patrick Giavalisco; Xiling Liu; Gareth Catchpole; Ning Fu; Zhi-Bin Ning; Song Guo; Zheng Yan; Mehmet Somel; Svante Pääbo; Rong Zeng; Lothar Willmitzer; Philipp Khaitovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Brain-specific Phgdh deletion reveals a pivotal role for L-serine biosynthesis in controlling the level of D-serine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor co-agonist, in adult brain.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Yang; Akira Wada; Kazuyuki Yoshida; Yurika Miyoshi; Tomoko Sayano; Kayoko Esaki; Masami O Kinoshita; Shozo Tomonaga; Norihiro Azuma; Masahiko Watanabe; Kenji Hamase; Kiyoshi Zaitsu; Takeo Machida; Albee Messing; Shigeyoshi Itohara; Yoshio Hirabayashi; Shigeki Furuya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest.

Authors:  Peter J Turnbaugh; Ruth E Ley; Michael A Mahowald; Vincent Magrini; Elaine R Mardis; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Tryptophan hydroxylase inhibition: the mechanism by which p-chlorophenylalanine depletes rat brain serotonin.

Authors:  E Jéquier; W Lovenberg; A Sjoerdsma
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 8.  Tyrosine hydroxylase and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J Haavik; K Toska
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Pipecolic acid induces apoptosis in neuronal cells.

Authors:  Shinji Matsumoto; Satoshi Yamamoto; Katsunari Sai; Keishi Maruo; Masaru Adachi; Masaru Saitoh; Tomoyuki Nishizaki
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  The role of psychological stress in inflammatory bowel disease: quality assessment of methods of 18 prospective studies and suggestions for future research.

Authors:  Rafael J A Cámara; Roger Ziegler; Stefan Begré; Alain M Schoepfer; Roland von Känel
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.216

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  The microbiome: stress, health and disease.

Authors:  Rachel D Moloney; Lieve Desbonnet; Gerard Clarke; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Gut microbiota role in irritable bowel syndrome: New therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Eleonora Distrutti; Lorenzo Monaldi; Patrizia Ricci; Stefano Fiorucci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  The microbiota-gut-brain axis in gastrointestinal disorders: stressed bugs, stressed brain or both?

Authors:  Giada De Palma; Stephen M Collins; Premysl Bercik; Elena F Verdu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Gut microbiota: a key player in health and disease. A review focused on obesity.

Authors:  M J Villanueva-Millán; P Pérez-Matute; J A Oteo
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 5.  Prebiotic Intake in Older Adults: Effects on Brain Function and Behavior.

Authors:  Monica C Serra; Joe R Nocera; Jessica L Kelleher; Odessa Addison
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2019-06

Review 6.  Connection between gut microbiome and brain development in preterm infants.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Erika C Claud
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Genomics of schizophrenia: time to consider the gut microbiome?

Authors:  T G Dinan; Y E Borre; J F Cryan
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 8.  Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Philip Strandwitz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Feeding the brain and nurturing the mind: Linking nutrition and the gut microbiota to brain development.

Authors:  Manu S Goyal; Siddarth Venkatesh; Jeffrey Milbrandt; Jeffrey I Gordon; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The Role of the Microbial Metabolites Including Tryptophan Catabolites and Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Pathophysiology of Immune-Inflammatory and Neuroimmune Disease.

Authors:  Gerwyn Morris; Michael Berk; Andre Carvalho; Javier R Caso; Yolanda Sanz; Ken Walder; Michael Maes
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.