Literature DB >> 23630062

Carotid artery stenting: patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics that increase procedural complications.

Christopher J White1, Stephen R Ramee, Tyrone J Collins, J Stephen Jenkins, John P Reilly, Rajan A G Patel.   

Abstract

From the earliest experiences with carotid artery stenting (CAS) presumptive high risk features have included thrombus-containing lesions, heavily calcified lesions, very tortuous vessels, and near occlusions. In addition patients have been routinely excluded from CAS trials if they have contra-indications to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and thienopyridines), a history of bleeding complications and severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD) making femoral artery vascular access difficult. Variables that increase the risk of CAS complications can be attributed to patient characteristics, anatomic or lesion features, and procedural factors. Clinical features such as older age (≥80 years), decreased cerebral reserve (dementia, multiple prior strokes, or intracranial microangiopathy) and angiographic characteristics such as excessive tortuosity (more than two 90° bends within 5 cm of the target lesion) and heavy calcification (concentric calcification ≥ 3 mm in width) have been associated with increased CAS complications. Other high risk CAS features include those that prolong catheter or guide wire manipulation in the aortic arch, make crossing a carotid stenosis more difficult, decrease the likelihood of successful deployment or retrieval of an embolic protection device (EPD), or make stent delivery or placement more difficult. Procedure volume for the operator and the catheterization laboratory team are critical elements in reducing the risk of the procedure. In this article, we help CAS operators better understand procedure risk to allow more intelligent case selection, further improving the outcomes of this emerging procedure.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrovascular disease; complications adult cath/intervention; peripheral vascular disease

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23630062     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  7 in total

1.  Recent publications by ochsner authors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

2.  Current Advances in the Use of Therapeutic Hypothermia.

Authors:  Neeraj Badjatia; Christopher J White; Abbot Laptook; Markus Föedisch
Journal:  Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.286

3.  Anatomical risk factors for ischemic lesions associated with carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Go Ikeda; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Masanari Shiigai; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Hideo Tsurushima; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 4.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Short- and long-term major cardiovascular adverse events in carotid artery interventions: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ming-Lung Tsai; Chun-Tai Mao; Dong-Yi Chen; I-Chang Hsieh; Ming-Shien Wen; Tien-Hsing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Carotid artery stenting: current and emerging options.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Ning Lin; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-20

7.  A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  E-Wook Jang; Joonho Chung; Kwon-Duk Seo; Sang Hyun Suh; Yong Bae Kim; Kyung-Yul Lee
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.