Literature DB >> 23630053

The toxicity of graphene oxides: dependence on the oxidative methods used.

Elaine Lay Khim Chng1, Martin Pumera.   

Abstract

Graphene, a class of two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial, has attracted extensive interest in recent years, with a significant amount of research focusing on graphene oxides (GOs). They have been primed as potential candidates for biomedical applications such as cell labeling and drug delivery, thus the toxicity and behavior of graphene oxides in biological systems are fundamental issues that need urgent attention. The production of GO is generally achieved through a top-down route, which includes the usage of concentrated H₂SO₄ along with: 1) concentrated nitric acid and KClO₃ oxidant (Hoffmann); 2) fuming nitric acid and KClO₃ oxidant (Staudenmaier); 3) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO₄ (Tour); or 4) sodium nitrate for in-situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO₄ (Hummers). It has been widely assumed that the properties of these four GOs produced by using the above different methods are roughly similar, so the methods have been used interchangeably. However, several studies have reported that the toxicity of graphene-related nanomaterials in biological systems may be influenced by their physiochemical properties, such as surface functional groups and structural defects. In addition, considering how GOs are increasingly used in the field of biomedicine, we are interested to see how the oxygen content/functional groups of GOs can impact their toxicological profiles. Since in-vitro testing is a common first step in assessing the health risks related with engineered nanomaterials, the cytotoxicity of the GOs prepared by the four different oxidative treatments was investigated by measuring the mitochondrial activity in adherent lung epithelial cells (A549) by using commercially available viability assays. The dose-response data was generated by using two assays, the methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-8). From the viability data, it is evident that there is a strong dose-dependent cytotoxic response resulting from the four GO nanomaterials tested after a 24 h exposure, and it is suggested that there is a correlation between the amounts of oxygen content/functional groups of GOs with their toxicological behavior towards the A549 cells.
Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23630053     DOI: 10.1002/chem.201300824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


  20 in total

1.  Antioxidant chemistry of graphene-based materials and its role in oxidation protection technology.

Authors:  Yang Qiu; Zhongying Wang; Alisa C E Owens; Indrek Kulaots; Yantao Chen; Agnes B Kane; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Effects of graphene oxide nanosheets on the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of the pulmonary surfactant film.

Authors:  Qinglin Hu; Bao Jiao; Xinghua Shi; Russell P Valle; Yi Y Zuo; Guoqing Hu
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Systematic toxicity investigation of graphene oxide: evaluation of assay selection, cell type, exposure period and flake size.

Authors:  V Gies; S Zou
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 4.  Is graphene a promising nano-material for promoting surface modification of implants or scaffold materials in bone tissue engineering?

Authors:  Ming Gu; Yunsong Liu; Tong Chen; Feng Du; Xianghui Zhao; Chunyang Xiong; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  An electrochemical immunosensor for the prostate specific antigen based on the use of reduced graphene oxide decorated with gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Parnaz Assari; Amir Abbas Rafati; Azizallah Feizollahi; Roghayeh Asadpour Joghani
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 6.  Functional Graphene Nanomaterials-Based Hybrid Scaffolds for Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Moon Sung Kang; Hee Jeong Jang; Seok Hyun Lee; Yong Cheol Shin; Suck Won Hong; Jong Hun Lee; Bongju Kim; Dong-Wook Han
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Safety concerns to application of graphene compounds in pharmacy and medicine.

Authors:  Mehdi Mogharabi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Mohammad Ali Faramarzi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Carbon Nanomaterials as Antibacterial Colloids.

Authors:  Michael Maas
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  No cytotoxicity or genotoxicity of graphene and graphene oxide in murine lung epithelial FE1 cells in vitro.

Authors:  Stefan Bengtson; Kirsten Kling; Anne Mette Madsen; Asger W Noergaard; Nicklas Raun Jacobsen; Per Axel Clausen; Beatriz Alonso; Amaia Pesquera; Amaia Zurutuza; Raphael Ramos; Hanako Okuno; Jean Dijon; Håkan Wallin; Ulla Vogel
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 10.  Multifaceted Biomedical Applications of Functional Graphene Nanomaterials to Coated Substrates, Patterned Arrays and Hybrid Scaffolds.

Authors:  Yong Cheol Shin; Su-Jin Song; Suck Won Hong; Seung Jo Jeong; Wojciech Chrzanowski; Jae-Chang Lee; Dong-Wook Han
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.