Literature DB >> 2362977

On the use of a logistic risk score in predicting risk of coronary heart disease.

L E Chambless1, A J Dobson, C C Patterson, B Raines.   

Abstract

Many studies over the last 20 years have used logistic regression to model the relationship between the risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and the levels of risk factors such as high blood pressure, high serum cholesterol, and cigarette smoking. Subsequently, several investigators have proposed the use of some of the published estimated logistic risk functions to predict risk in new populations. Because of great variation in definition of event, duration of follow-up, population characteristics, definition of risk variables, and selection of other variables in the logistic functions, direct use of such established functions would generally not have validity for the prediction of absolute risk levels. A review of fifteen of these studies indicates on the one hand generally similar results in direction and order of magnitude of effects of the major risk factors, confirming the importance of these risk factors of CHD. On the other hand the reviews indicate sufficient variation to suggest that extrapolation to new populations even to predict relative risk is not justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2362977     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780090410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Using the Framingham model to predict heart disease in the United Kingdom: retrospective study.

Authors:  S Ramachandran; J M French; M P Vanderpump; P Croft; R H Neary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

2.  Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men.

Authors:  I U Haq; L E Ramsay; W W Yeo; P R Jackson; E J Wallis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  A risk prediction model for smoking experimentation in Mexican American youth.

Authors:  Rajesh Talluri; Anna V Wilkinson; Margaret R Spitz; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Composite cardiovascular risk outcomes of a work-site intervention trial.

Authors:  M K Gomel; B Oldenburg; J M Simpson; M Chilvers; N Owen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A review of cost-effectiveness analyses of hypertension treatment.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost effectiveness and equity of a community based cardiovascular disease prevention programme in Norsjö, Sweden.

Authors:  L Lindholm; M Rosén; L Weinehall; K Asplund
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Prediction of coronary heart disease mortality in Busselton, Western Australia: an evaluation of the Framingham, national health epidemiologic follow up study, and WHO ERICA risk scores.

Authors:  M W Knuiman; H T Vu
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Homogeneity in the relationship of serum cholesterol to coronary deaths across different cultures: 40-year follow-up of the Seven Countries Study.

Authors:  Alessandro Menotti; Mariapaola Lanti; Daan Kromhout; Henry Blackburn; David Jacobs; Aulikki Nissinen; Anastasios Dontas; Antony Kafatos; Srecko Nedeljkovic; Hisashi Adachi
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2008-12

9.  The Dundee coronary risk-disk for management of change in risk factors.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-28

10.  Prediction of mortality from coronary heart disease among diverse populations: is there a common predictive function?

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.