Literature DB >> 23629543

The Problem With Estimating Public Health Spending.

Jonathon P Leider1.   

Abstract

Accurate information on how much the United States spends on public health is critical. These estimates affect planning efforts; reflect the value society places on the public health enterprise; and allows for the demonstration of cost-effectiveness of programs, policies, and services aimed at increasing population health. Yet, at present, there are a limited number of sources of systematic public health finance data. Each of these sources is collected in different ways, for different reasons, and so yields strikingly different results. This article aims to compare and contrast all 4 current national public health finance data sets, including data compiled by Trust for America's Health, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO), and the Census, which underlie the oft-cited National Health Expenditure Account estimates of public health activity. In FY2008, ASTHO estimates that state health agencies spent $24 billion ($94 per capita on average, median $79), while the Census estimated all state governmental agencies including state health agencies spent $60 billion on public health ($200 per capita on average, median $166). Census public health data suggest that local governments spent an average of $87 per capita (median $57), whereas NACCHO estimates that reporting LHDs spent $64 per capita on average (median $36) in FY2008. We conclude that these estimates differ because the various organizations collect data using different means, data definitions, and inclusion/exclusion criteria--most notably around whether to include spending by all agencies versus a state/local health department, and whether behavioral health, disability, and some clinical care spending are included in estimates. Alongside deeper analysis of presently underutilized Census administrative data, we see harmonization efforts and the creation of a standardized expenditure reporting system as a way to meaningfully systematize reporting of public health spending and revenue.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 23629543     DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182941a7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  4 in total

1.  Woolhandler and Himmelstein Respond.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public Health's Share of US Health Spending.

Authors:  David Bishai; Jonathon P Leider; Beth Resnick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Linking costs to health outcomes for allocating scarce public health resources.

Authors:  Phaedra S Corso; Justin B Ingels; Nathaniel Taylor; Samir Desai
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-12-22

4.  Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada.

Authors:  Julie Fiset-Laniel; Ak'ingabe Guyon; Robert Perreault; Erin C Strumpf
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.