Literature DB >> 23629083

Quantitative comparison of volume maintenance between inlay and onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton.

Kristoffer B Sugg1, Andrew H Rosenthal, Wayne Ozaki, Steven R Buchman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonvascularized autologous bone grafts are the criterion standard in craniofacial reconstruction for bony defects involving the craniofacial skeleton. The authors have previously demonstrated that graft microarchitecture is the major determinant of volume maintenance for both inlay and onlay bone grafts following transplantation. This study performs a head-to-head quantitative analysis of volume maintenance between inlay and onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton using a rabbit model to comparatively determine their resorptive kinetics over time.
METHODS: Fifty rabbits were divided randomly into six experimental groups: 3-week inlay, 3-week onlay, 8-week inlay, 8-week onlay, 16-week inlay, and 16-week onlay. Cortical bone from the lateral mandible and both cortical and cancellous bone from the ilium were harvested from each animal and placed either in or on the cranium. All bone grafts underwent micro-computed tomographic analysis at 3, 8, and 16 weeks.
RESULTS: All bone graft types in the inlay position increased their volume over time, with the greatest increase in endochondral cancellous bone. All bone graft types in the onlay position decreased their volume over time, with the greatest decrease in endochondral cancellous bone. Inlay bone grafts demonstrated increased volume compared with onlay bone grafts of identical embryologic origin and microarchitecture at all time points (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Inlay bone grafts, irrespective of their embryologic origin, consistently display less resorption over time compared with onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Both inlay and onlay bone grafts are driven by the local mechanical environment to recapitulate the recipient bed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23629083      PMCID: PMC4487985          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828e217a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  * Tissue Engineering Strategies to Improve Osteogenesis in the Juvenile Swine Alveolar Cleft Model.

Authors:  Montserrat Caballero; Donna C Jones; Zhengyuan Shan; Sajjad Soleimani; John A van Aalst
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  The use of autogeneous mandibular bone block grafts for reconstruction of alveolar defects.

Authors:  Doğan Dolanmaz; Alparslan Esen; Gülsün Yıldırım; Özgür İnan
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

3.  Retrospective long-term analysis of bone level changes after horizontal alveolar crest reconstruction with autologous bone grafts harvested from the posterior region of the mandible.

Authors:  Jan Oliver Voss; Tobias Dieke; Christian Doll; Claudia Sachse; Katja Nelson; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Susanne Nahles
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  The "One Piece" Autologous Tuberosity Graft: A Contemporary Concept in Ridge Preservation.

Authors:  Ronald Younes; Carla Maria Khairallah
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-02-13

5.  Combating Constraints of the Functional Matrix: The Importance of Overcorrection in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas T K Do; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.