Literature DB >> 23627799

The effect of stimulus distribution form on the acquisition and rate of conditioned responding: implications for theory.

Dómhnall J Jennings1, Eduardo Alonso, Esther Mondragón, Mathijs Franssen, Charlotte Bonardi.   

Abstract

In four experiments rats were conditioned to an auditory conditioned stimulus (conditioned stimulus; CS) that was paired with food, and learning about the CS was compared across two conditions in which the mean duration of the CS was equated. In one, the CS was of a single, fixed duration on every trial, and in the other the CS duration was drawn from an exponential distribution, and hence changed from trial to trial. Higher rates of conditioned responding to the fixed than to the variable stimulus were observed, in both between- (Experiment 1) and within-subject designs (Experiments 2 and 3). Moreover, this difference was maintained when stimuli trained with fixed or variable durations were tested under identical conditions (i.e., with equal numbers of fixed and variable duration trials)-suggesting that the difference could not be attributed to performance effects (Experiment 3). In order to estimate the speed of acquisition of conditioned responding, the scaled cumulative distribution of a Weibull function was fitted to the trial-by-trial response rates for each rat. In the within-subject experiments specific differences in the pattern of acquisition to fixed and variable CS were shown; a somewhat different pattern was found when intertrial interval (ITI) was manipulated (Experiment 4). The implications of these findings for theories of conditioning and timing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23627799     DOI: 10.1037/a0032151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  6 in total

1.  A Rescorla-Wagner drift-diffusion model of conditioning and timing.

Authors:  André Luzardo; Eduardo Alonso; Esther Mondragón
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Acquisition of conditioned responding in a multiple schedule depends on the reinforcement's temporal contingency with each stimulus.

Authors:  Lorenzo Morè; Greg Jensen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  The effects of stimulus distribution form during trace conditioning.

Authors:  Charlotte Bonardi; Dómhnall J Jennings
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  SSCC TD: a serial and simultaneous configural-cue compound stimuli representation for temporal difference learning.

Authors:  Esther Mondragón; Jonathan Gray; Eduardo Alonso; Charlotte Bonardi; Dómhnall J Jennings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Learning about the CS during latent inhibition: Preexposure enhances temporal control.

Authors:  Charlotte Bonardi; Ben Brilot; Dómhnall J Jennings
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.478

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.