Literature DB >> 2362774

Infectivity, antigenicity and host responses to isolates of the genus Trichinella.

F Bolas-Fernandez1, D Wakelin.   

Abstract

Comparisons were made of the infectivity and antigenicity of 4 Trichinella spiralis isolates (S, D, Y, W), of quite different geographical origins, and T. pseudospiralis (P) in rapid- and slow-responder inbred mice. Infectivity was measured by the Index of Reproductive Capacity (ICR) expressed as the ratio between the number of muscle larvae recovered on day 30 post-infection (p.i.) and the numbers of larvae given at infection. Antigen recognition was measured by the degree of proliferation of mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNC) to in vitro stimulation with crude muscle larvae antigen (CMLA) and by the total antibody responses to CMLA at day 25 p.i. as measured by ELISA. Regarding infectivity the isolates fell into two groups, high infectivity (S, D and Y) and low infectivity (W and P). Analysis of CMLA, detergent-stripped (CTAB) and 125I-labelled surface larval proteins was made by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Differences in antigen profiles were seen in all antigen preparations, being most noticeable in CTAB and 125I-labelled proteins from W and P isolates. Antigen recognition by polyclonal infection-derived antisera and by monoclonal antibodies raised against the T. spiralis London strain (L) was studied in the W (Arctic) and S (Spanish) isolates. Polyclonal antisera recognized different antigens in the S and W isolates, as did the monoclonal antibody, although recognition was more restricted. Neither antibody recognized a 64 kDa band in the W isolate which was clearly visible in the others tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2362774     DOI: 10.1017/s003118200007880x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  7 in total

1.  Immuno-proteomic analysis of Trichinella spiralis, T. pseudospiralis, and T. papuae extracts recognized by human T. spiralis-infected sera.

Authors:  Chalermchai Somboonpatarakun; Rutchanee Rodpai; Pewpan M Intapan; Oranuch Sanpool; Lakkhana Sadaow; Chaisiri Wongkham; Tonkla Insawang; Thidarut Boonmars; Wanchai Maleewong
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Detection and identification of eight Trichinella genotypes by reverse line blot hybridization.

Authors:  Y B Rombout; S Bosch; J W Van Der Giessen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  PCR-RFLP patterns of four isolates of Trichinella for rDNA ITS1 region.

Authors:  H S Kwon; M S Chung; K H Joo
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.341

4.  Immune responses to Trichinella spiralis and T. pseudospiralis in mice.

Authors:  D Wakelin; P K Goyal; M S Dehlawi; J Hermanek
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Cell-mediated response at the muscle phase of Trichinella pseudospiralis and Trichinella spiralis infections.

Authors:  K M Lee; R C Ko
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Development and evaluation of a Western blot kit for diagnosis of human trichinellosis.

Authors:  Hélène Yera; Shakir Andiva; Catherine Perret; Denis Limonne; Pascal Boireau; Jean Dupouy-Camet
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-09

7.  Predilection muscles and physical condition of raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) experimentally infected with Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella nativa.

Authors:  T Mikkonen; L Oivanen; A Näreaho; H Helin; A Sukura
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.695

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.