PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate drug interactions and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the older patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) and to characterize risk factors. METHODS: In 80 patients aged 65 years and older medication history and ED drug administration were analysed. Medical records were analysed for ADRs by an expert panel which also evaluated their avoidability and causality. An interaction program was used to search for potential drug interactions followed by assessment for clinical significance. Data were analysed using a logistic regression model. The significance level was set at alpha=0.05. RESULTS: Eighty seven ADRs were identified in 37 patients; 18 were the result of an interaction (15 patients). Causality was assessed as definite (n=11), probable (n=62) and possible (n=24). The reason for admission was definitely and probably related to an ADR in 6 and 18 patients respectively. Only 17 (20%) of the ADRs were assessed as unavoidable, while 23 (26%) and 47 (54%) were classified as definitely and possibly avoidable, respectively. ADRs were related with female gender (p=0.023) and number of drugs (p=0.004), but not with high age (p=0.151). Clinically relevant interactions were related with older age (p=0.032) and number of drugs (p=0.003), but not with gender (p=0.380). None of the interactions with ED initiated medications were considered unjustified. CONCLUSIONS: ADRs frequently occur in the older patients admitted to the ED and are an important cause of hospital admissions with a substantial contribution of adverse drug interactions.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate drug interactions and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the older patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) and to characterize risk factors. METHODS: In 80 patients aged 65 years and older medication history and ED drug administration were analysed. Medical records were analysed for ADRs by an expert panel which also evaluated their avoidability and causality. An interaction program was used to search for potential drug interactions followed by assessment for clinical significance. Data were analysed using a logistic regression model. The significance level was set at alpha=0.05. RESULTS: Eighty seven ADRs were identified in 37 patients; 18 were the result of an interaction (15 patients). Causality was assessed as definite (n=11), probable (n=62) and possible (n=24). The reason for admission was definitely and probably related to an ADR in 6 and 18 patients respectively. Only 17 (20%) of the ADRs were assessed as unavoidable, while 23 (26%) and 47 (54%) were classified as definitely and possibly avoidable, respectively. ADRs were related with female gender (p=0.023) and number of drugs (p=0.004), but not with high age (p=0.151). Clinically relevant interactions were related with older age (p=0.032) and number of drugs (p=0.003), but not with gender (p=0.380). None of the interactions with ED initiated medications were considered unjustified. CONCLUSIONS: ADRs frequently occur in the older patients admitted to the ED and are an important cause of hospital admissions with a substantial contribution of adverse drug interactions.
Authors: Nibu Parameswaran Nair; Leanne Chalmers; Bonnie J Bereznicki; Colin Curtain; Gregory M Peterson; Michael Connolly; Luke R Bereznicki Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Beatrijs Mertens; Julie Hias; Laura Hellemans; Karolien Walgraeve; Isabel Spriet; Jos Tournoy; Lorenz Roger Van der Linden Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Abubakar Ibrahim Jatau; Myat Moe Thwe Aung; Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman; Ab Fatah Ab Rahman Journal: Drugs Real World Outcomes Date: 2015-10-23
Authors: Vishal R Tandon; Vijay Khajuria; Vivek Mahajan; Aman Sharma; Zahid Gillani; Annil Mahajan Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.375