Literature DB >> 23626417

Retained surgical sponge mimicking GIST: Laparoscopic diagnosis and removal 34 years after original surgery.

Jonatan W R Justo1, Paulo Sandler, Leandro T Cavazzola.   

Abstract

The term gossypiboma denotes a cotton foreign body retained inside the patient during surgery, a rare surgical complication. The symptoms following this entity are non-specific, such as pain, palpable mass and fever, which make clinical diagnosis difficult. The computerized tomography (CT) scan is the most useful method for diagnosis; however, sometimes the preoperative diagnosis remains uncertain even after the imaging exam. In that case, laparoscopy arises as a valuable diagnostic tool, as well as a prompt treatment option. However, when diagnosis is made years after the original surgery, the laparoscopic approach becomes harder. Our patient presented without clear symptoms, remaining asymptomatic for 34 years. The CT scan presumptive diagnosis was a gastrointestinal stromal tumour, and laparoscopy was performed providing an accurate diagnosis and treatment in the same surgical time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gossypiboma; laparoscopy; retained foreign body; textiloma

Year:  2013        PMID: 23626417      PMCID: PMC3630713          DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.107133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Access Surg        ISSN: 1998-3921            Impact factor:   1.407


INTRODUCTION

The term gossypiboma denotes a foreign body retained inside the patient during surgery. A minimally invasive technique and a highly effective therapy place laparoscopy as an assertive option to approach cases without a definitive preoperative diagnosis. Our objective is to report a case of retained surgical sponge diagnosed and removed by laparoscopic surgery, 34 years after the original surgery.

CASE REPORT

A 70-year-old man, with a medical history of vagotomy for a peptic gastric ulcer (operated in another institution 34 years ago), had an incidentally discovered mass in the abdomen on plain chest radiography. The mass was 8 cm diameter and was located on left hypochondrium. The only symptomatology was mild bloating, started a few months before. The computerized tomography (CT) scan showed a heterogeneous and low-density mass, with peripheral calcifications, measuring 7.4 cm diameter. The presumptive diagnosis made by the radiologist was gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) [Figure 1].
Figure 1

CT scan showing an heterogeneous and low density mass, with peripheral calcifications, measuring 7.4 cm diameter, localized on left hypochondrium

CT scan showing an heterogeneous and low density mass, with peripheral calcifications, measuring 7.4 cm diameter, localized on left hypochondrium Endoscopic biopsy provided no additional information about the mass etiology, evidencing signs of external compression without mucosal lesion. The patient was then submitted to laparoscopy. During the procedure, dissection showed a capsulated structure. After violation of the capsule and drainage of debris, a retained sponge was discovered [Figure 2]. An aseptic plastic material was used to wrap it for laparoscopic removal.
Figure 2

(a) Material that was involving the sponge and constituting a fibrous capsule; (b) The retained sponge discovered after 34 years

(a) Material that was involving the sponge and constituting a fibrous capsule; (b) The retained sponge discovered after 34 years

DISCUSSION

The incidence of this complication is 1 in 8801 to 1 in 18,700 surgeries.[1] In a prospective study, Greenberg et al. found that the frequency of counting discrepancy of sponges during surgery (i.e., a subsequent count does not match the previous one) was about one in eight operations, contributing to the occurrence of this complication.[2] Concerning gossypiboma, prevention is preferred rather than treatment. Notwithstanding, there is no highly reliable prevention system. Counting sponges is a method based on staff communication during the surgery with only 77% sensibility.[2] Routine surgical postoperative X-ray (SPOX) constitutes an early detection system, but the need to incorporate a radiopaque marker and to expose the whole surgical field to maximize its efficacy limits its use.[2] More recently, electronic dispositives based on barcode detection and other technological adjuncts for counting sponges are being developed.[2-4] None of these prevention systems are reliable when used alone.[2] Multiple procedures and surgical teams, long operations and non-elective operations are the evidenced risk factors.[23] The most common symptoms are pain, palpable mass and fever.[5] Because of its non-specific symptoms, diagnosis can be difficult (the differential diagnosis passes through a infinitude of other more prevalent diseases).[5] Therefore, facing a patient with vague symptoms and a history of previous surgery, we must suspect of this iatrogenic complication. Gossypiboma-related complications normally appear within 2 years after the original surgery.[3] There are reported cases whose diagnosis were made decades after original surgery – most of them with retained sponges localized in the thorax.[23] Accordingly, our case was an abdominal retained sponge, diagnosed 34 years after original surgery (asymptomatic in this period) and mimicking a GIST – transcending other literature reported cases.[3] Since discrepancies on counting sponges register are frequently absent, the imaging exams become valuable for gossypiboma detection in an asymptomatic phase of the disease – avoiding diagnosis only after a related complication.[5] The CT scan is the most commonly used and the most useful method for diagnosis.[2] Awareness of typical appearance on radiologic exams is critical.[5-7] It appears on CT images with some characteristic signs: low-density heterogeneous mass, with an external high-density wall that is further highlighted on contrast-enhanced imaging and has a spongiform pattern containing air bubbles.[6] Minimally invasive surgery for removal is successful within a few weeks of the original operation.[8-10] However, the technically difficult dissection needed (when adherence and inflammation are installed) demands an experienced surgeon to its laparoscopic removal feasibility (as demonstrated in our case).
  10 in total

1.  Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Angus R O'Connor; Fergus V Coakley; Maxwell V Meng; Stephen C Eberhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Gossypiboma: its laparoscopic diagnosis and removal.

Authors:  Rajpal Singh; R K Mathur; Sanjay Patidar; Ritesh Tapkire
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart R Lipsitz; Rafael Diaz-Flores; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Calcified reticulate rind sign: a characteristic feature of gossypiboma on computed tomography.

Authors:  Yi-Ying Lu; Yun-Chung Cheung; Sheung-Fat Ko; Shu-Hang Ng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Retained surgical sponge.

Authors:  I M Ibrahim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.

Authors:  Alex Macario; Dean Morris; Sharon Morris
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07

7.  Gossypiboma: tales of lost sponges and lessons learned.

Authors:  Lisa K McIntyre; Gregory J Jurkovich; Martin L D Gunn; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-08

Review 8.  Imaging of gossypibomas: pictorial review.

Authors:  Adonis Manzella; Paulo Borba Filho; Eolo Albuquerque; Fabiana Farias; João Kaercher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges.

Authors:  Wenshuai Wan; Thuan Le; Loren Riskin; Alex Macario
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  Retained surgical items and minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Verna C Gibbs
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Removal of Gossypiboma.

Authors:  Zeki Özsoy; Ismail Okan; Emin Daldal; Mehmet Fatih Dasıran; Yavuz Selim Angın; Mustafa Şahin
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.