Literature DB >> 23624994

Application of the ELOHA framework to regulated rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin: a case study.

Ryan A McManamay1, Donald J Orth, Charles A Dolloff, David C Mathews.   

Abstract

In order for habitat restoration in regulated rivers to be effective at large scales, broadly applicable frameworks are needed that provide measurable objectives and contexts for management. The Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was created as a template to assess hydrologic alterations, develop relationships between altered streamflow and ecology, and establish environmental flow standards. We tested the utility of ELOHA in informing flow restoration applications for fish and riparian communities in regulated rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin (UTRB). We followed the steps of ELOHA to generate univariate relationships between altered flows and ecology within the UTRB. By comparison, we constructed multivariate models to determine improvements in predictive capacity with the addition of non-flow variables. We then determined whether those relationships could predict fish and riparian responses to flow restoration in the Cheoah River, a regulated system within the UTRB. Although ELOHA provided a robust template to construct hydrologic information and predict hydrology for ungaged locations, our results do not suggest that univariate relationships between flow and ecology (step 4, ELOHA process) can produce results sufficient to guide flow restoration in regulated rivers. After constructing multivariate models, we successfully developed predictive relationships between flow alterations and fish/riparian responses. In accordance with model predictions, riparian encroachment displayed consistent decreases with increases in flow magnitude in the Cheoah River; however, fish richness did not increase as predicted 4 years after restoration. Our results suggest that altered temperature and substrate and the current disturbance regime may have reduced opportunities for fish species colonization. Our case study highlights the need for interdisciplinary science in defining environmental flows for regulated rivers and the need for adaptive management approaches once flows are restored.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624994     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0055-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Attributes of an alluvial river and their relation to water policy and management.

Authors:  W J Trush; S M McBain; L B Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart E Bunn; Angela H Arthington
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Toxicity of fluoride to the endangered unionid mussel, Alasmidonta raveneliana, and surrogate species.

Authors:  A E Keller; T Augspurger
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Delineation and evaluation of hydrologic-landscape regions in the United States using geographic information system tools and multivariate statistical analyses.

Authors:  David M Wolock; Thomas C Winter; Gerard McMahon
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.

Authors:  Angela H Arthington; Stuart E Bunn; N LeRoy Poff; Robert J Naiman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications.

Authors:  N Leroy Poff; Julian D Olden; David M Merritt; David M Pepin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Michael G McManus
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.443

2.  Organizing Environmental Flow Frameworks to Meet Hydropower Mitigation Needs.

Authors:  Ryan A McManamay; Shannon K Brewer; Henriette I Jager; Matthew J Troia
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Advancing Environmental Flow Science: Developing Frameworks for Altered Landscapes and Integrating Efforts Across Disciplines.

Authors:  Shannon K Brewer; Ryan A McManamay; Andrew D Miller; Robert Mollenhauer; Thomas A Worthington; Tom Arsuffi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?

Authors:  Cassandra S James; Stephen J Mackay; Angela H Arthington; Samantha J Capon; Anna Barnes; Ben Pearson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.