| Literature DB >> 23624891 |
Han-Woo Kim1, Kazuhiko Ishikawa.
Abstract
The hyperthermophilic endocellulase, EGPh (glycosyl hydrolase family 5) from Pyrococcus horikoshii possesses 4 cysteine residues forming 2 disulfide bonds, as identified by structural analysis. One of the disulfide bonds is located at the proximal region of the active site in EGPh, which exhibits a distinct pattern from that of the thermophilic endocellulase EGAc (glycosyl hydrolase family 5) of Acidothermus cellulolyticus despite the structural similarity between the two endocellulases. The structural similarity between EGPh and EGAc suggests that EGPh possesses a structure suitable for changing the position of the disulfide bond corresponding to that in EGAc. Introduction of this alternative disulfide bond in EGPh, while removing the original disulfide bond, did not result in a loss of enzymatic activity but the EGPh was no longer hyperthermostable. These results suggest that the contribution of disulfide bond to hyperthermostability at temperature higher than 100 °C is restrictive, and that its impact is dependent on the specific structural environment of the hyperthermophilic proteins. The data suggest that the structural position and environment of the disulfide bond has a greater effect on high-temperature thermostability of the enzyme than on the potential energy of the dihedral angle that contributes to disulfide bond cleavage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23624891 PMCID: PMC3691470 DOI: 10.1007/s00792-013-0542-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Extremophiles ISSN: 1431-0651 Impact factor: 2.395
Statistics of data collection and refinement
| Wild type | P74C | |
|---|---|---|
| Data collection | ||
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Space group |
|
|
| Unit-cell parameters (Å) |
|
|
| Matthews coefficient (Åc Da−1) | 2.35 | 2.37 |
| Solvent content (%) | 47.68 | 48.16 |
| Subunits per asymmetric unit | 3 | 3 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 50–1.75 (1.81–1.75) | 50–1.95 (1.98–1.95) |
| Number of observed reflections | 457,155 | 385,303 |
| Total number of unique reflections | 121,695 | 89,041 |
| Redundancy | 3.8 (3.2) | 4.4 (4.1) |
| < | 37.9 (5.0) | 20.3 (6.4) |
| | 0.073 (0.434) | 0.085 (0.305) |
| Completeness (%) | 98.7 (87.5) | 99.5 (98.5) |
| Refinement | ||
| Resolution used in refinement | 44.69–1.75 (1.77–1.75) | 34.52–1.95 (1.97–1.95) |
| | 17.6 (27.4) | 15.4 (15.3) |
| | 20.5 (31.6) | 18.8 (22.7) |
| R.M.S. bond distance (Å) | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| R.M.S. bond angle (°) | 1.072 | 1.083 |
| Mean overall | 23.99 | 15.61 |
| Ramachandran plot | ||
| In favored regions (%) | 98.1 | 98.0 |
| In disallowed regions (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| PDB ID | 3W6L | 3W6M |
Values for the last resolution shell are given in parentheses
a R merge = ∑hkl ∑ | I (hkl) − | ∑hkl ∑ I (hkl), where I (hkl) is the i-th intensity measurement of reflection hkl, including symmetry-related reflections, and is their average
b R work = ∑hkl | F o − F c|/∑hkl F o where F o and F c are the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes of reflection hkl, respectively
c R free is calculated as the R cryst, using F o that was excluded from the refinement (5 % of the data)
Fig. 1Comparison of the overall structure from P. horikoshii EGPh (magenta) and A. cellulolyticus EGAc (light green) (a) and close-up cross-eyed stereo view of the structure of the disulfide bonds in EGPh and EGAc (b). The cellotetraose from the EGAc-ligand complexed structure (PDB code: 1ECE) is denoted by yellow color
Fig. 2Cross-eyed stereo view of 2F o–F c (blue) and F o–F c (green) positive electron density in the omit map of P74C. The F o–F c omit map (contour level: 3.0 σ) was calculated prior to incorporation of 3 Cys residues in the structure model
Fig. 3Comparison of the disulfide bonds from the mutants and wild type. P74C with 3 Cys residues showed an identical disulfide-bonding pattern to EGAc. C106S has no disulfide bond
Comparison of the geometry and potential energy of the disulfide bond on the structures of wild type and the mutant P74C
| Enzymes | S–S bond | Mola |
|
|
|
|
| DSE (kJ mol−1)b | Cα–Cα (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | C106–C159 | A | 60.9 | 148.8 | 85.1 | −89.8 | −50.3 | 11.7 | 5.7 |
| B | 58.0 | 150.4 | 84.3 | −89.6 | −52.5 | 10.9 | 5.7 | ||
| C | 64.9 | 148.6 | 79.6 | −90.4 | −53.5 | 11.7 | 5.7 | ||
| P74C | C74–C159 | A | −58.9 | −51.0 | 89.8 | 99.8 | 60.4 | 9.2 | 5.0 |
| B | −64.5 | −46.1 | 88.3 | 91.9 | 62.2 | 8.3 | 5.1 | ||
| C | −55.9 | −53.4 | 88.6 | 89.8 | 57.2 | 7.0 | 5.0 |
The five χ angles of the disulfide bond are represented as the below
aThis protein crystal contains the 3 molecules in the symmetric unit
bThe dihedral strain energy (DSE) of the disulfide was calculated using the following empirical formula (Schmidt et al. 2006)
DSE (kJ mol−1) = 8.37(1 + cos 3χ 1) + 8.37(1 + cos 3χ 1′) + 4.18(1 + cos 3χ 2) + 4.18(1 + cos 3χ 2′) + 14.64(1 + cos 2χ 3) + 2.51(1 + cos 3χ 3)
Fig. 4Thermostability of wild type and the mutants examined by measuring the residual activity after heat treatment. Heat treatment of the proteins (1.5 μM) was performed at 95 °C for each incubation time, and chilled immediately on ice. The residual activity was measured by detecting reducing sugar released from CMC
Fig. 5Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) profiles of wild type and the mutants in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5)