Literature DB >> 23624717

Clinical features of supervoiders who suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms: a propensity score-matching study.

Joo Yong Lee1, Yoon Soo Hah, Dae Hun Lee, Woo Jin Bang, Won Sik Ham, Seung Wook Lee, Kang Su Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with maximal urine flow rate (Q max) ≥ 25 ml/s complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), using propensity score-matching analysis to compare with the control group.
METHODS: Medical records from a prospectively maintained database for first visit male patients with LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia between 2010 and 2012 were used to select 818 patients. Of these patients, 68 men with Q max ≥ 25 ml/s were defined as the supervoider group, and 68 patients were selected for the control group using propensity scores, which were calculated for each patient using multivariable logistic regression model based on the following covariates: age, prostate volume, voided urine volume, and post-voided residual volume. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Mean Q max was 30.82 ± 5.13 in supervoiders and 15.95 ± 4.88 ml/s in controls (p < 0.001). There were statistical differences in IPSS between supervoiders and controls (12.63 ± 5.81 vs. 16.13 ± 6.90; p = 0.002). Although the IPSS voiding symptom sub-score in supervoiders was lower than controls (5.09 ± 3.35 vs. 7.40 ± 4.00; p < 0.001), there were no significant differences in storage symptom and post-micturitional symptom sub-scores. In OABSS and subdomain scores for frequency, nocturia, and urgency, there were no significant differences between the groups. However, the urge incontinence subdomain score was significantly higher in supervoiders versus controls (0.69 ± 1.26 vs. 0.18 ± 0.52; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Supervoiders experience comparable levels of storage and post-micturition symptoms, but display more severe urge incontinence despite milder voiding symptoms and better uroflowmetric measurements than propensity score-matched controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624717     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1081-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  28 in total

1.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

Authors:  Karem Slim; Emile Nini; Damien Forestier; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Yves Panis; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 4.  Uroflowmetry.

Authors:  J B Jørgensen; K M Jensen
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 5.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Comprehensive patient evaluation for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  J V Jepsen; R C Bruskewitz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Detrusor instability in men: correlation of lower urinary tract symptoms with urodynamic findings.

Authors:  M J Hyman; A Groutz; J G Blaivas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The impact of urge urinary incontinence on quality of life: importance of patients' perspective and explanatory style.

Authors:  C E DuBeau; B Levy; C M Mangione; N M Resnick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Overactive bladder is not only overactive but also hypersensitive.

Authors:  Seung Ryeol Lee; Hyung Joon Kim; Ayoung Kim; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.