Literature DB >> 23624634

Comparative evaluation of in vivo osteogenic differentiation of fetal and adult mesenchymal stem cell in rat critical-sized femoral defect model.

Chris Hyunchul Jo1, Pil Whan Yoon, Hyang Kim, Kyung Sun Kang, Kang Sup Yoon.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can be obtained from various sources. MSCs from different origins appear to have different preferences for differentiation. In this study, we have compared the in vivo osteogenic potential of adult MSCs from adipose tissue (AT) and bone marrow (BM) with fetal MSCs from umbilical cord (UC) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) by using a rat critical-sized femoral defect model. We have also sought to determine whether pretreatment with an osteogenic medium promotes osteogenesis in MSCs. Study groups were divided as follows: (1) defect only, (2) scaffold only, (3) AT MSCs in scaffolds, (4) BM MSCs in scaffolds, (5) UC MSCs in scaffolds and (6) UCB MSCs in scaffolds. Groups with MSCs were further divided with respect to their pretreatment. At 12 weeks after surgery, in vivo osteogenesis was measured radiographically and by micro-computed tomography (CT). Based on quantitative assessment by micro-CT, no significant difference of the mean bone volume fraction value (BV/TV) was seen between adult MSCs (AT and BM MSCs) and fetal MSCs (UC and UCB MSCs). The mean BV/TVs were significantly higher in non-pretreated BM MSC (14.2±1.4%) and UCB MSC (14.0±1.2%) and pretreated UC MSC (14.8±2.0%) than in those with the scaffold only (11.3±1.3%; P<0.05). In addition, AT (from 10.4±1.2% to 13.1±2.2%) and UC (from 10.3±0.7% to 14.8±2.0%) MSCs from solid tissues showed a significant increase in the mean BV/TV with pretreatment (P<0.05). In contrast, BM MSC (from 14.2±1.4% to 10.9±1.2%) and UCB MSC (from 14.0±1.2% to 11.6±1.0%) from non-solid tissues showed a significant decrease with pretreatment (P<0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624634     DOI: 10.1007/s00441-013-1619-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Res        ISSN: 0302-766X            Impact factor:   5.249


  10 in total

1.  Characterization of Tendon-Specific Markers in Various Human Tissues, Tenocytes and Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chris Hyunchul Jo; Hyun-Ju Lim; Kang Sup Yoon
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.169

2.  Cell seeding density is a critical determinant for copolymer scaffolds-induced bone regeneration.

Authors:  Mohammed A Yassin; Knut N Leknes; Torbjorn O Pedersen; Zhe Xing; Yang Sun; Stein A Lie; Anna Finne-Wistrand; Kamal Mustafa
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Minimal Cube Explant Provides Optimal Isolation Condition of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord.

Authors:  Ah-Young Lee; Kwi-Hoon Jang; Chris Hyunchul Jo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 4.  Current View on Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived from Placental Tissues.

Authors:  Gabriela Kmiecik; Valentina Spoldi; Antonietta Silini; Ornella Parolini
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining.

Authors:  Kristian Kjærgaard; Chris H Dreyer; Nicholas Ditzel; Christina M Andreasen; Li Chen; Søren P Sheikh; Søren Overgaard; Ming Ding
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Bone regeneration with umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in femoral defects of ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Boohwi Hong; Sunyeul Lee; Nara Shin; Youngkwon Ko; DongWoon Kim; Jun Lee; Wonhyung Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2018-09-26

7.  CTRP3 exacerbates tendinopathy by dysregulating tendon stem cell differentiation and altering extracellular matrix composition.

Authors:  Yongsik Cho; Hyeon-Seop Kim; Donghyun Kang; Hyeonkyeong Kim; Narae Lee; Jihye Yun; Yi-Jun Kim; Kyoung Min Lee; Jin-Hee Kim; Hang-Rae Kim; Young-Il Hwang; Chris Hyunchul Jo; Jin-Hong Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 8.  Adipose-derived mesenchymal cells for bone regereneration: state of the art.

Authors:  Marta Barba; Claudia Cicione; Camilla Bernardini; Fabrizio Michetti; Wanda Lattanzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Comparative Study of Microtubule-associated Protein-2 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Proteins during Neural Induction of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadat Mostafavi; Shahnaz Razavi; Mohammad Mardani; Ebrahim Esfandiari; Hamid Zarkesh Esfahani; Mohammad Kazemi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05

10.  Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Samih Mohamed-Ahmed; Mohammed A Yassin; Ahmad Rashad; Heidi Espedal; Shaza B Idris; Anna Finne-Wistrand; Kamal Mustafa; Hallvard Vindenes; Inge Fristad
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.249

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.