Literature DB >> 23624448

Does pulse oximetry accurately monitor a patient's ventilation during sedated endoscopy under oxygen supplementation?

Hiroshi Arakawa1, Mitsuru Kaise, Kazuki Sumiyama, Shoichi Saito, Takeshi Suzuki, Hisao Tajiri.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pulse oximetry (SpO2) measures oxygen saturation but not alveolar ventilation. Its failure to detect alveolar hypoventilation during sedated endoscopy under oxygen supplementation has been reported. The aim of this study was to measure the masking effect of oxygen supplementation in SpO2 when alveolar hypoventilation develops during sedated endoscopy.
METHODS: A total of 70 patients undergoing sedated diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly divided into two groups - oxygen supplementation group (n = 35) and room air breathing group (n = 35). SpO2 and end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) were measured by non-intubated capnography during the procedure for all the patients.
RESULTS: The rise of etCO2 caused by alveolar hypoventilation was comparable in the two groups after sedation. SpO2 was significantly higher in the oxygen supplementation group than in the room air breathing group (98.6% ± 1.4% vs. 93.1% ± 2.9%; p < 0.001) at peak etCO2, and oxygen supplementation caused SpO2 to be overestimated by greater than 5% when compared with room air. SpO2 at peak etCO2 was reduced from the baseline before sedation for the oxygen supplementation and room air breathing groups by 0.5% ± 1.1% and 4.1% ± 3.1%, respectively (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: SpO2 alone is not adequate for monitoring alveolar ventilation during sedated endoscopy under oxygen supplementation due to possible delays in detecting alveolar hypoventilation in patients. Even if SpO2 decreases by only 1% during the procedure and its level remains near 100%, physicians should consider the onset of severe alveolar hypoventilation, which requires immediate intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624448     DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2013075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  9 in total

1.  Feasibility of breath monitoring in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy under propofol sedation: A single-center pilot study.

Authors:  Gurpreet W Anand; Ludwig T Heuss
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-16

Review 2.  Myths, fallacies and practical pearls in GI lab.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-16

Review 3.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  Endoscopic sedation: risk assessment and monitoring.

Authors:  Young Chul Yoo
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-03-31

5.  Capnography sensor use is associated with reduction of adverse outcomes during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with sedation administration.

Authors:  Michael W Jopling; Jiejing Qiu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  A Low-Cost Breath Analyzer Module in Domiciliary Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation for Remote COPD Patient Monitoring.

Authors:  Antonio Vincenzo Radogna; Pietro Aleardo Siciliano; Saverio Sabina; Eugenio Sabato; Simonetta Capone
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Can Bispectral Index Monitoring (EEG) be an Early Predictor of Respiratory Depression under Deep Sedation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  Ebru Tarikci Kilic; Suleyman Sayar
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Advanced Monitoring Is Associated with Fewer Alarm Events During Planned Moderate Procedure-Related Sedation: A 2-Part Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Richard L Applegate; John Lenart; Mathew Malkin; Minhthy N Meineke; Silvana Qoshlli; Monica Neumann; J Paul Jacobson; Alison Kruger; Jeffrey Ching; Mohammad Hassanian; Michael Um
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Guidelines on analgosedation, monitoring, and recovery time for flexible bronchoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Strohleit; Thomas Galetin; Nils Kosse; Alberto Lopez-Pastorini; Erich Stoelben
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.317

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.