Literature DB >> 23624098

An experimental evaluation of the influence of water depth and bottom color on the Common kingfisher's foraging performance.

Antonio Vilches1, Juan Arizaga, Ixai Salvo, Rafael Miranda.   

Abstract

To investigate how depth and bottom color affect prey selectivity in Common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis), we developed several experimental procedures using captive birds. We used 20 young kingfishers to test depth (25 or 50cm) and color (natural gravel or white) effects on foraging behavior. Live freshwater fish were used as target prey. To assess differences resulting from the natural behavior of different fish, we chose bottom-dwelling [Ebro barbel (Barbus graellsii)] and open-water benthopelagic species [Ebro nase (Parachondrostoma miegii) and Pyrenean minnow (Phoxinus bigerri)]. The number of attempts and captures, as well as the effects of hunger and experience, were assessed relative to feeding behavior. The effect of fish behavior, as observed in grouped vs. isolated fish, on the kingfisher's performance was also tested. The results showed a significant effect of depth, with more attacks and greater success in shallow waters. No significant differences in catch success between natural- and white-colored bottoms were observed. Hunger had no effect on fishing success, but experience had a positive effect in shallow waters and on white bottoms. Both bottom- and open-water species were consumed equally. Kingfishers preyed more often upon grouped prey than upon isolated prey, although capture success did not vary between the two cases. Our results suggest that kingfishers prey upon the most accessible types of prey.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Captivity; Fish eating bird; Prey selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624098     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  2 in total

1.  Repeated evolution of drag reduction at the air-water interface in diving kingfishers.

Authors:  K E Crandell; R O Howe; P L Falkingham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Wind and water tunnel testing of a morphing aquatic micro air vehicle.

Authors:  Robert Siddall; Alejandro Ortega Ancel; Mirko Kovač
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.