Literature DB >> 23624008

Contrast and correlations between coarse and fine particulate matter in the United States.

R Li1, C Wiedinmyer, M P Hannigan.   

Abstract

The characteristics of concentrations of PM₁₀₋₂.₅, PM₂.₅, and PM₁₀ at 77 sites in the United States are evaluated. PM₁₀ concentrations show strong spatial variability, with highest levels occurring in the southwestern United States, driven primarily by PM₁₀₋₂.₅. PM₁₀₋₂.₅ and PM₂.₅ concentrations show different spatial patterns. The highest concentrations of PM₁₀₋₂.₅ were observed at sites in the southwestern US, leading to the highest PM₁₀ concentrations there. The PM₂.₅ concentrations are the major contributors to the average PM₁₀ concentrations at many sites in the eastern United States. Poor correlations were generally found between PM₁₀₋₂.₅ and PM₂.₅, suggesting that PM₁₀₋₂.₅ and PM₂.₅ are generally influenced by different sources. PM₁₀₋₂.₅ is generally more variable than PM₂.₅ because PM₁₀₋₂.₅ has a higher deposition velocity and is primarily emitted from mechanical processes (e.g. agricultural harvest and construction) that are more influenced by factors including human operation and wind speed leading to a strong episodic nature. As a result of its high variability, PM₁₀₋₂.₅ acts as the major driver for PM₁₀ extremes. PM₁₀₋₂.₅ is significantly correlated with PM₁₀ at all investigated sites, with the average correlation value R(2)=0.79. Correlations of PM₂.₅ with PM₁₀ (average of 0.37) are overall considerably lower than those between PM₁₀₋₂.₅ and PM₁₀. Different seasonal, weekly, and diurnal patterns were observed between PM₁₀₋₂.₅ and PM₂.₅ at agricultural, on-road traffic, quarrying, airport, and marine sites. At investigated agricultural sites, while the concentrations of PM₂.₅ are higher in winter when there are few agricultural activities, PM₁₀₋₂.₅ concentrations are lower in winter months than in summer and autumn months, with highest levels corresponding to harvest and planting. The harvest and planting signatures were not observed in PM₂.₅ concentrations at any of these sites, suggesting that agricultural activities do not have a strong influence on PM₂.₅ concentrations.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624008     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of particulate matter: a case study in the Po Valley. Part II: concentration and solubility of micro- and trace-elements.

Authors:  S Canepari; M L Astolfi; C Farao; M Maretto; D Frasca; M Marcoccia; C Perrino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Esophageal eosinophilia is increased in rural areas with low population density: results from a national pathology database.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Jensen; Kate Hoffman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Robert M Genta; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Lead isotope trends and sources in the atmosphere at the artificial wetland.

Authors:  Ling Cong; Jiexiu Zhai; Guoxin Yan; Jiakai Liu; Yanan Wu; Yu Wang; Zhenming Zhang; Mingxiang Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.