Literature DB >> 23623906

One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution.

Liuzhong Shen1, Shengshou Hu, Haoran Wang, Hui Xiong, Zhe Zheng, Lihuan Li, Bo Xu, Hongbing Yan, Runlin Gao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare midterm clinical outcomes of 1-stop hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: One-stop HCR has emerged to be a feasible and attractive alternative to CABG and PCI in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
METHODS: From June 2007 to December 2010, 141 consecutive patients underwent 1-stop HCR at Fuwai Hospital. Using propensity score methodology, these patients were matched with 2 separate groups of 141 patients who underwent isolated CABG or PCI during the same period. All patients were stratified by the EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation Score) and the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score. Cutoffs for EuroSCORE (low, ≤2; medium, >2 and <6; high, ≥6) and SYNTAX score (low, ≤24; medium, >24 and <30; high, ≥30) were identified by tertiles. Three groups' cumulative major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rates in each risk tertile were compared.
RESULTS: One-stop HCR incurred MACCE rate lower than that with PCI (p < 0.001), but similar to that with CABG (p = 0.140). After stratification by EuroSCORE or SYNTAX score, the cumulative MACCE rates were similar among the 3 groups in low and medium tertiles. But in the high EuroSCORE tertile, patients who underwent 1-stop HCR had a lower MACCE rate than did the groups that underwent CABG (p = 0.030) and PCI (p = 0.006). Meanwhile, patients with a high SYNTAX score who underwent 1-stop HCR had a MACCE rate lower than did those who underwent PCI (p = 0.002), but similar to that of those who underwent CABG (p = 0.362).
CONCLUSIONS: One-stop HCR provides favorable midterm outcomes for selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in each risk tertile. For patients with high EuroSCORE or SYNTAX score, it might provide a promising alternative to CABG and PCI.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623906     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  18 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Zhe Zheng; John H Alexander; Judson B Williams; Ying Xian; Michael E Halkos; J Matthew Brennan; Robbert J de Winter; Peter K Smith; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Hybrid coronary revascularization: present indications and future perspective.

Authors:  Konstantinos Voudris; Dimitrios V Avgerinos; Dmitriy Feldman; Konstantinos Charitakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03

4.  Hybrid myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Yugal Kishore Mishra; Jatin Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-03-05

Review 5.  Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Yu; Keying Zhu; Nannan Du; Yuexiu Si; Jiali Liang; Ruijing Shen; Bangsheng Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  Preliminary application of hybrid operation in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients with complex ischemic cerebrovascular diseases.

Authors:  Liyong Zhang; Tao Xing; Fenyang Geng; Lixin Du; Jiyue Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-07-15

7.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of two-vessel coronary artery disease with proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis.

Authors:  Jiapei Qiu; Pengxiong Zhu; Zixiong Liu; Hong Xu; Jun Liu; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  The curative effect of synthetic treatment for refractory acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Ding-Xiong Xie; Yi-Rong Gan; Jiong Li; Yan-Zhen Wang; Zong-Ke Kou; Rui Mao; Tian-Xiang Liang; Yun-Long Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Zhu; Pengyu Zhou; Yong Sun; Yilong Guo; Mingjie Mai; Shaoyi Zheng
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 10.  Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization Strategies for Patients With MVD/LMCA Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Kan Fan; Ya-Min Su; Xing-Xing Cai; Zhou-Shan Gu; Hai-Hua Geng; Hai-Yan Pan; Jian-Hua Zhu; Min Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.