Literature DB >> 23623624

Antimicrobial susceptibility of inpatient urinary tract isolates of gram-negative bacilli in the United States: results from the study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends (SMART) program: 2009-2011.

Sam K Bouchillon1, Robert E Badal, Daryl J Hoban, Stephen P Hawser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends is an ongoing global surveillance program that has monitored the susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from inpatient urinary tract infections (UTIs) since late 2009.
OBJECTIVE: This analysis reports on the in vitro susceptibility of 2,135 isolates collected by 24 US sites from hospitalized patients with UTIs between 2009 and 2011.
METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations and susceptibility were determined according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
RESULTS: Of the isolates collected, 88.6% (1,892) were Enterobacteriaceae, which included 48.9% (n = 1,045) Escherichia coli, 14.5% (n = 310) Klebsiella pneumoniae, 6.4% (n = 136) Proteus mirabilis, 2.5% (n = 54) Klebsiella oxytoca, and 16.3% (n = 347) other Enterobacteriaceae species. Overall, 6.8% of E coli, 10.3% of K pneumoniae, 3.7% of P mirabilis, and 11.1% of K oxytoca isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains. Of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 67.5% were community associated and 26.9% were hospital associated (5.7% had no demographics). Highest overall rates of activity for the study period were seen with amikacin, ertapenem, and imipenem. The least active antimicrobials tested were ampicillin-sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin.
CONCLUSIONS: Ertapenem, imipenem, and amikacin were the most active study drugs against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains, although the activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing K pneumoniae did not exceed 69% throughout the study period. The results of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends surveillance study document the rates of antimicrobial resistance in UTI pathogens in the United States, which can assist health care practitioners in selecting the appropriate treatment for UTIs.
Copyright © 2013. Published by EM Inc USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623624     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  39 in total

1.  The Rise of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli in the Community: Scarier Than We Thought.

Authors:  Brad Spellberg; Yohei Doi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  Fosfomycin: Resurgence of an old companion.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sastry; Yohei Doi
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.211

3.  Fluoroquinolone and Third-Generation-Cephalosporin Resistance among Hospitalized Patients with Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli: Do Rates Vary by Hospital Characteristics and Geographic Region?

Authors:  Monique R Bidell; Melissa Palchak; John Mohr; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Cutting to the Core of the Issue: Emerging Strategies To Reduce Prostate Biopsy-Related Infections.

Authors:  Robin R Chamberland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Cross-Resistance Patterns among Common Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in U.S. Hospitals, 2013 to 2018.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Brian H Nathanson; Kate Sulham; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  The Effect of Local Antibiogram-based Augmented Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection-related Complications Following Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Raoul S Concepcion; Edward M Schaeffer; Neal D Shore; Deepak A Kapoor; Jeffrey A Scott; Gary M Kirsh
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2019

Review 7.  New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Michael Davenport; Kathleen E Mach; Linda M Dairiki Shortliffe; Niaz Banaei; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Characterization of Lipid A Variants by Energy-Resolved Mass Spectrometry: Impact of Acyl Chains.

Authors:  Christopher M Crittenden; Lucas D Akin; Lindsay J Morrison; M Stephen Trent; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  A Cohort Study of Risk Factors That Influence Empirical Treatment of Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Pau Bosch-Nicolau; Vicenç Falcó; Belén Viñado; Antonia Andreu; Oscar Len; Benito Almirante; Carles Pigrau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Role of newer and re-emerging older agents in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Joshua T Thaden; Jason M Pogue; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.