Literature DB >> 23623606

Stiffness control of balance during dual task and prospective falls in older adults: the MOBILIZE Boston Study.

Hyun Gu Kang1, Lien Quach, Wenjun Li, Lewis A Lipsitz.   

Abstract

Outdoor fallers differ from indoor fallers substantially in demographics, lifestyle, health condition and physical function. Biomechanical predictors of outdoor falls have not been well characterized. Current validated measures of postural deficits, which describe only the overall postural behavior, are predictive of indoor falls but not outdoor falls. We hypothesized that a model-based description of postural muscle tone and reflexes, particularly during dual tasking, would predict outdoor falls. We tested whether postural stiffness and damping from an inverted pendulum model were predictive of future indoor and outdoor falls among older adults from the MOBILIZE Boston Study. The center of pressure data during standing were obtained from 717 participants aged 77.9±5.3 years. Participants stood barefoot with eyes open for 30s per trial, in two sets of five standing trials. One set included a serial subtractions task. Postural stiffness and damping values were determined from the postural sway data. After the postural measurements, falls were monitored prospectively using a monthly mail-in calendar over 6-36 months. Associations of postural measures with fall rates were determined using negative binomial regressions. After covariate adjustments, postural stiffness (p=0.02-0.05) and damping (p=0.007-0.1) were associated with lower outdoor falls risk, but not with indoor falls. Results were invariant by direction (anteroposterior versus mediolateral) or by condition (quiet standing versus dual task). Outdoor fall risk may be tied to postural control more so than indoor falls. Dual tasking is likely related to fall risk among older and sicker older adults, but not those relatively healthy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual task; Falls; Mathematical model; Motor control; Postural control

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623606      PMCID: PMC3796021          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  37 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers.

Authors:  Y Lajoie; S P Gallagher
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration.

Authors:  John Jeka; Tim Kiemel; Robert Creath; Fay Horak; Robert Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment.

Authors:  D Lafond; M Duarte; F Prince
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Reevaluating the implications of recurrent falls in older adults: location changes the inference.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelsey; Elizabeth Procter-Gray; Sarah D Berry; Marian T Hannan; Douglas P Kiel; Lewis A Lipsitz; Wenjun Li
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers.

Authors:  I Melzer; N Benjuya; J Kaplanski
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing.

Authors:  Sukyung Park; Fay B Horak; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Constantinos N Maganaris; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences in postural sway among healthy adults are associated with the ability to perform steady contractions with leg muscles.

Authors:  Leah A Davis; Stephen P Allen; Landon D Hamilton; Alena M Grabowski; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  A review of center of pressure (COP) variables to quantify standing balance in elderly people: Algorithms and open-access code.

Authors:  Flavien Quijoux; Alice Nicolaï; Ikram Chairi; Ioannis Bargiotas; Damien Ricard; Alain Yelnik; Laurent Oudre; François Bertin-Hugault; Pierre-Paul Vidal; Nicolas Vayatis; Stéphane Buffat; Julien Audiffren
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-11

3.  Associations between Tactile Sensory Threshold and Postural Performance and Effects of Healthy Aging and Subthreshold Vibrotactile Stimulation on Postural Outcomes in a Simple Dual Task.

Authors:  Marius Dettmer; Amir Pourmoghaddam; Beom-Chan Lee; Charles S Layne
Journal:  Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2016-04-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.