OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) for management of uncontrolled postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by community-based providers in a resource-limited setting could be feasible, effective, and safe. METHODS: In rural South Sudan, community providers were trained and equipped with a simple UBT device consisting of a catheter, condom, and syringe. Snowball sampling identified cases of UBT use since training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among community providers, referral facility providers, patients, and patient family members. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Thirteen cases were identified and 24 interviews related to community-based UBT use were conducted. Qualitative analysis revealed several major themes. Community providers applied UBT in appropriate clinical situations. UBT was effective for controlling PPH, even among severely ill patients. Referral was difficult and lengthy owing to the austere setting, but simple UBT appeared to mitigate these challenges. Communities had some initial fears, yet ultimately embraced UBT. Equipment and supplies were largely maintained. There was universal satisfaction with UBT among patients, family members, and providers. One death occurred among the 13 cases, although it was probably not attributable to PPH. CONCLUSION: Training and UBT device provision are simple, affordable, and effective for managing uncontrolled PPH in a resource-limited setting.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) for management of uncontrolled postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by community-based providers in a resource-limited setting could be feasible, effective, and safe. METHODS: In rural South Sudan, community providers were trained and equipped with a simple UBT device consisting of a catheter, condom, and syringe. Snowball sampling identified cases of UBT use since training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among community providers, referral facility providers, patients, and patient family members. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Thirteen cases were identified and 24 interviews related to community-based UBT use were conducted. Qualitative analysis revealed several major themes. Community providers applied UBT in appropriate clinical situations. UBT was effective for controlling PPH, even among severely ill patients. Referral was difficult and lengthy owing to the austere setting, but simple UBT appeared to mitigate these challenges. Communities had some initial fears, yet ultimately embraced UBT. Equipment and supplies were largely maintained. There was universal satisfaction with UBT among patients, family members, and providers. One death occurred among the 13 cases, although it was probably not attributable to PPH. CONCLUSION: Training and UBT device provision are simple, affordable, and effective for managing uncontrolled PPH in a resource-limited setting.
Authors: Abirami Natarajan; Anna Alaska Pendleton; Brett D Nelson; Roy Ahn; Monica Oguttu; Lidu Dulo; Melody J Eckardt; Thomas F Burke Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Dietmar Schlembach; Hanns Helmer; Wolfgang Henrich; Christian von Heymann; Franz Kainer; Wolfgang Korte; Maritta Kühnert; Heiko Lier; Holger Maul; Werner Rath; Susanne Steppat; Daniel Surbek; Jürgen Wacker Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Anna Alaska Pendleton; Abirami Natarajan; Roy Ahn; Brett D Nelson; Melody J Eckardt; Thomas F Burke Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Abirami Natarajan; Roy Ahn; Brett D Nelson; Melody Eckardt; Jennifer Kamara; Sas Kargbo; Pity Kanu; Thomas F Burke Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 3.007