Literature DB >> 23623557

Poor sensitivity of a modified Alvarado score in adults with suspected appendicitis.

Andrew C Meltzer1, Brigitte M Baumann, Esther H Chen, Frances S Shofer, Angela M Mills.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: A clinical decision rule that identifies patients at low risk for appendicitis may reduce the reliance on computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis. We seek to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of a low modified Alvarado score in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected appendicitis and compare the score to clinical judgment. We hypothesize that a low modified Alvarado score will have a sufficiently high sensitivity to rule out acute appendicitis.
METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of adult patients with suspected appendicitis at 2 academic urban EDs. A low modified Alvarado score was defined as less than 4. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for a low modified Alvarado score, and a final diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed by CT, laparotomy, or 7-day follow-up.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one patients were included for analysis (mean age 35 years [range 18 to 89 years], 68% female patients, 52% white). Fifty-three patients (20%) had acute appendicitis. The modified Alvarado score test characteristics demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 72% (95% CI 58% to 84%) and 54% (95% CI 47% to 61%), respectively. Unstructured clinical judgment that appendicitis was either the most likely or second most likely diagnosis demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 93% (95% CI 82% to 98%) and 33% (95% CI 27% to 40%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: With a sensitivity of 72%, a low modified Alvarado score is less sensitive than clinical judgment in excluding acute appendicitis.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623557     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  11 in total

1.  A Clinical Score to Predict Appendicitis in Older Male Children.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Michael C Monuteaux; Richard G Bachur; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Michelle D Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Manoj K Mittal; Jonathan E Bennett; Kelly Sinclair; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 2.  A report on the Academic Emergency Medicine 2015 consensus conference "Diagnostic imaging in the emergency department: a research agenda to optimize utilization".

Authors:  Martin L Gunn; Jennifer R Marin; Angela M Mills; Suzanne T Chong; Adam T Froemming; Jamlik O Johnson; Manickam Kumaravel; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-27

3.  Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC).

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson; Uli K Chettipally; Mamata V Kene; Steven P Dehmer; Richard G Bachur; Peter S Dayan; Nathan Kuppermann; Patrick J O'Connor; Elyse O Kharbanda
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?

Authors:  Malsha Kularatna; Melanie Lauti; Cheyaanthan Haran; Wiremu MacFater; Laila Sheikh; Ying Huang; John McCall; Andrew D MacCormick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Increased anatomic severity in appendicitis is associated with outcomes in a South African population.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Victor Y Kong; Johnathon M Aho; John L Bruce; Stephanie F Polites; Grant L Laing; Martin D Zielinski; Damian L Clarke
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  A protocol for non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Camille G Dessaigne; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge; Alicia M Mohr; Janeen R Jordan
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Prospective evaluation of the ability of clinical scoring systems and physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis to obviate the need for CT.

Authors:  Sean K Golden; John B Harringa; Perry J Pickhardt; Alexander Ebinger; James E Svenson; Ying-Qi Zhao; Zhanhai Li; Ryan P Westergaard; William J Ehlenbach; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Application of scoring systems with point-of-care ultrasonography for bedside diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Erden Erol Ünlüer; Rıfat Urnal; Utku Eser; Serkan Bilgin; Mehmet Hacıyanlı; Orhan Oyar; Haldun Akoğlu; Arif Karagöz
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2016

Review 9.  A systematic review of studies comparing diagnostic clinical prediction rules with clinical judgment.

Authors:  Sharon Sanders; Jenny Doust; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical Importance of the Heel Drop Test and a New Clinical Score for Adult Appendicitis.

Authors:  Shin Ahn; Hyeji Lee; Wookjin Choi; Ryeok Ahn; Jung-Suk Hong; Chang Hwan Sohn; Dong Woo Seo; Yoon-Seon Lee; Kyung Soo Lim; Won Young Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.