Literature DB >> 23623156

Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial.

Koichi Hosomi1, Toshio Shimokawa, Katsunori Ikoma, Yusaku Nakamura, Kenji Sugiyama, Yoshikazu Ugawa, Takenori Uozumi, Takamitsu Yamamoto, Youichi Saitoh.   

Abstract

There is little evidence for multisession repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain (NP), although single-session rTMS was suggested to provide transient pain relief in NP patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 10 daily rTMS in NP patients. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study at 7 centers. Seventy NP patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. A series of 10 daily 5-Hz rTMS (500 pulses/session) of primary motor cortex (M1) or sham stimulation was applied to each patient with a follow-up of 17days. The primary outcome was short-term pain relief assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were short-term change in the short form of the McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), cumulative changes in the following scores (VAS, SF-MPQ, the Patient Global Impression of Change scale [PGIC], and the Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]), and the incidence of adverse events. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry. Sixty-four NP patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The real rTMS, compared with the sham, showed significant short-term improvements in VAS and SF-MPQ scores without a carry-over effect. PGIC scores were significantly better in real rTMS compared with sham during the period with daily rTMS. There were no significant cumulative improvements in VAS, SF-MPQ, and BDI. No serious adverse events were observed. Our findings demonstrate that daily high-frequency rTMS of M1 is tolerable and transiently provides modest pain relief in NP patients.
Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623156     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  33 in total

Review 1.  Modulating the pain network--neurostimulation for central poststroke pain.

Authors:  Koichi Hosomi; Ben Seymour; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Pharmacological management of central post-stroke pain: a practical guide.

Authors:  Jong S Kim
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Research Hotspots and Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pain: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Chong Li; Mingyu Sun; Shiliu Tian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 4.  Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex of Individuals with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hyunjoong Kim; Jihye Jung; Sungeon Park; Younglan Joo; Sangbong Lee; Seungwon Lee
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 5.  An Update on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Co-morbid Pain and Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Jonathan H Hsu; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-06-14

Review 6.  Analgesic Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kun-Long Zhang; Hua Yuan; Fei-Fei Wu; Xue-Yin Pu; Bo-Zhi Liu; Ze Li; Kai-Feng Li; Hui Liu; Yi Yang; Ya-Yun Wang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 7.  Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Louise Marston; Sally Spencer; Lorraine H DeSouza; Benedict M Wand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 8.  Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Louise Marston; Sally Spencer; Lorraine H DeSouza; Benedict M Wand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-16

9.  Enhancement of Cortical Network Activity in vitro and Promotion of GABAergic Neurogenesis by Stimulation with an Electromagnetic Field with a 150 MHz Carrier Wave Pulsed with an Alternating 10 and 16 Hz Modulation.

Authors:  Alexandra Gramowski-Voß; Hans-Joachim Schwertle; Anna-Maria Pielka; Luise Schultz; Anne Steder; Konstantin Jügelt; Jürgen Axmann; Wolfgang Pries
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research.

Authors:  Max M Klein; Roi Treister; Tommi Raij; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lawrence Park; Turo Nurmikko; Fred Lenz; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Magdalena Lang; Mark Hallett; Michael Fox; Merit Cudkowicz; Ann Costello; Daniel B Carr; Samar S Ayache; Anne Louise Oaklander
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.