Literature DB >> 23622936

Collagen-only biomatrix as dural substitute: What happened after a 5-year observational follow-up study.

Felice Esposito1, Gianluca Grimod, Luigi M Cavallo, Luigi Lanterna, Francesco Biroli, Paolo Cappabianca.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess long-term efficacy of the collagen-only biomatrix as a dural substitute in a large case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively acquired database of patients who underwent neurosurgical surgeries in whom the dural substitute was used and who were the subject of two previous studied with shorter follow-ups.
RESULTS: The present study was conducted on 111 subjects of the original 209 patients. No late complications, nor local or systemic toxicity were observed during the observational period. As a matter of facts, 5 patients (4.5%) underwent reoperation for different reasons and 2 out of 5 experienced subcutaneous fluid collections; another case (0.9%), already reported in our previous studies, developed a CSF leak after an endoscopic endonasal operation for an intra-suprasellar arachnoid cyst.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data further confirm that the collagen-only biomatrix derived from horse equine tendon is a safe and effective dural substitute for routine neurosurgical procedures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Collagen; Dura; Dura mater regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622936     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  7 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of new chitin-chitosan graft for duraplasty.

Authors:  M Pogorielov; A Kravtsova; G C Reilly; V Deineka; G Tetteh; O Kalinkevich; O Pogorielova; R Moskalenko; G Tkach
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Histologic Comparison of the Dura Mater among Species.

Authors:  Ahmet Kinaci; Wilhelmina Bergmann; Ronald Law Bleys; Albert van der Zwan; Tristan Pc van Doormaal
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers.

Authors:  Zhong-Ding Zhang; Li-Yan Zhao; Yi-Ru Liu; Jing-Yu Zhang; Shang-Hui Xie; Yan-Qi Lin; Zhuo-Ning Tang; Huang-Yi Fang; Yue Yang; Shi-Ze Li; Jian-Xi Liu; Han-Song Sheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  Histopathological Investigation of the Effectiveness of Collagen Matrix in the Repair of Experimental Spinal Dura Mater Defects.

Authors:  Cagatay Calikoglu; Murteza Cakir; Yusuf Tuzun
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2018-12-03

5.  Fibrin Sealants in Dura Sealing: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Felice Esposito; Filippo Flavio Angileri; Peter Kruse; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Vincenzo Esposito; Francesco Tomasello; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A novel equine-derived pericardium membrane for dural repair: A preliminary, short-term investigation.

Authors:  Roberto Centonze; Emiliano Agostini; Samantha Massaccesi; Stefano Toninelli; Letterio Morabito
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Safety and Efficacy of a Novel, Self-Adhering Dural Substitute in a Canine Supratentorial Durotomy Model.

Authors:  Kevin M Lewis; Jenifer Sweet; Scott T Wilson; Serge Rousselle; Heinz Gulle; Bernhard Baumgartner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.