BACKGROUND: Despite a few experimental studies showing a dose-dependent myocardial depressive effect of propofol anesthesia induction, few clinical data are available to determine its precise impact on myocardial function, probably because of its brevity and a lack of appropriate evaluation tools. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of propofol-based anesthesia induction on left ventricular (LV) function using Doppler tissue and speckle-tracking imaging. METHODS: In 19 low-risk patients with normal LV systolic and diastolic function undergoing noncardiac surgery (all women; mean age, 42 years), propofol bolus (2.0 mg/kg) was administered intravenously for anesthesia induction. LV ejection fraction, global peak systolic longitudinal strain, and tissue Doppler-derived indices of mitral annular velocity during systole (S'), early diastole (e'), and atrial contraction (a') were determined by intraoperative transthoracic echocardiography before and 1, 3, and 5 min after propofol bolus (T0, T1, T2, and T3, respectively). RESULTS: The following at T1, T2, and T3 were significantly less in magnitude than at T0: septal S' (5.61, 5.61, and 5.51 vs 7.60 cm/sec, P < .001), lateral S' (5.75, 5.89, and 5.94 vs 8.12 cm/sec, P < .001), septal e' (10.10, 10.26, and 10.07 vs 11.4 cm/sec, P < .01), septal a' (6.70, 6.21, and 6.13 vs 8.58 cm/sec, P < .01), lateral a' (7.29, 6.81, and 6.85 vs 9.01 cm/sec, P < .01), and longitudinal strain (-19.36%, -19.71%, and -19.61% vs -22.28%, P < .001). LV ejection fraction was not significantly changed (P = .361). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol anesthesia induction diminished LV and atrial contraction in low-risk patients with prior normal LV function. Further studies are needed to understand the clinical implications, particularly for higher risk populations.
BACKGROUND: Despite a few experimental studies showing a dose-dependent myocardial depressive effect of propofol anesthesia induction, few clinical data are available to determine its precise impact on myocardial function, probably because of its brevity and a lack of appropriate evaluation tools. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of propofol-based anesthesia induction on left ventricular (LV) function using Doppler tissue and speckle-tracking imaging. METHODS: In 19 low-risk patients with normal LV systolic and diastolic function undergoing noncardiac surgery (all women; mean age, 42 years), propofol bolus (2.0 mg/kg) was administered intravenously for anesthesia induction. LV ejection fraction, global peak systolic longitudinal strain, and tissue Doppler-derived indices of mitral annular velocity during systole (S'), early diastole (e'), and atrial contraction (a') were determined by intraoperative transthoracic echocardiography before and 1, 3, and 5 min after propofol bolus (T0, T1, T2, and T3, respectively). RESULTS: The following at T1, T2, and T3 were significantly less in magnitude than at T0: septal S' (5.61, 5.61, and 5.51 vs 7.60 cm/sec, P < .001), lateral S' (5.75, 5.89, and 5.94 vs 8.12 cm/sec, P < .001), septal e' (10.10, 10.26, and 10.07 vs 11.4 cm/sec, P < .01), septal a' (6.70, 6.21, and 6.13 vs 8.58 cm/sec, P < .01), lateral a' (7.29, 6.81, and 6.85 vs 9.01 cm/sec, P < .01), and longitudinal strain (-19.36%, -19.71%, and -19.61% vs -22.28%, P < .001). LV ejection fraction was not significantly changed (P = .361). CONCLUSIONS:Propofol anesthesia induction diminished LV and atrial contraction in low-risk patients with prior normal LV function. Further studies are needed to understand the clinical implications, particularly for higher risk populations.
Authors: Nathan J Smischney; Sumedh S Hoskote; Alice Gallo de Moraes; Carlos J Racedo Africano; Perliveh M Carrera; Rudy Tedja; Jasleen K Pannu; Elizabeth C Hassebroek; Dereddi Raja S Reddy; Richard F Hinds; Lokendra Thakur Journal: Trials Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.279