Literature DB >> 23622795

Differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI.

T W Kang1, S H Kim, H J Park, S Lim, K M Jang, D Choi, S J Lee.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the benefit of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from the wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Fourteen patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and 19 patients with the wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer were included. Qualitative (visual diffusion restriction compared to liver parenchyma) and quantitative [apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] analyses were performed. Conventional MRI findings including dynamic enhancement pattern between the two groups were also analysed. Two observers independently reviewed conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and subsequently reviewed combined conventional MRI and DWI images. Pairwise comparison of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to compare diagnostic performances.
RESULTS: In conventional MRI findings, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis showed significant continuity of enhancing mucosal line [79% (11/14) versus 26% (5/19), p = 0.003] and intramural T2-high signal intensity [64% (9/14) versus 21% (4/19), p = 0.012] compared to the wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer. The enhancement pattern of gallbladder cancer compared to liver parenchyma showed earlier onset than that of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (p = 0.001). Diffusion restriction was more frequently seen in the wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer (68%, 13/19) than in xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (7%, 1/14; p < 0.001). The mean ADC value of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis was higher than that of the wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer with statistical significance (1.637 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.076 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, p = 0.005). Diagnostic performance [area under ROC curve (Az)] of both observers improved significantly after additional review of DWI; Az improved from 0.737 to 0.930 (p = 0.027) for observer 1 and from 0.675 to 0.938 (p = 0.008) for observer 2.
CONCLUSION: Addition of DWI to conventional MRI improves discrimination between xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and the wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer.
Copyright © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622795     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  18 in total

1.  The efficiency of apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and in differentiation of cholecystitis from extrinsic benign gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Mehmet Beyazal; Serhat Avcu; Fatma Beyazal Celiker; Alpaslan Yavuz; Osman Toktaş
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Tae Wook Kang; Dong Ik Cha; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Kee-Taek Jang; Soo Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Strategies for Differentiating Gallbladder Carcinoma from Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis-a Tertiary Care Centre Experience.

Authors:  Rajaguru Kishore; Samiran Nundy; Siddharth Mehrotra; Naimish Metha; Vivek Mangla; Shailendra Lalwani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 4.  Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: What every radiologist should know.

Authors:  Vaibhav P Singh; S Rajesh; Chhagan Bihari; Saloni N Desai; Sudheer S Pargewar; Ankur Arora
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28

5.  Implications of imaging criteria for the management and treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms - benign versus malignant findings.

Authors:  Thula Cannon Walter; Ingo G Steffen; Lars H Stelter; Martin H Maurer; Marcus Bahra; Wladimir Faber; Fritz Klein; Hendrik Bläker; Bernd Hamm; Timm Denecke; Christian Grieser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  What's new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  James P Nugent; Jessica Li; Emily Pang; Alison Harris
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions.

Authors:  Motokazu Sato; Yusuke Kurita; Eiji Sakai; Seitaro Watanabe; Haruto Sanada; Tomoki Shimizu; Kenji Kanoshima; Yusuke Takai; Koki Meguro; Yuichi Sugimoto; Yusuke Biwata; Kunihiro Hosono; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Kensuke Kubota; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 8.  Complications of cholecystitis: a comprehensive contemporary imaging review.

Authors:  Kiran Maddu; Sonia Phadke; Carrie Hoff
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-06-10

9.  Expression of GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 in xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis induced a positive result on ¹⁸F-FDG PET: report of a case.

Authors:  Shigeaki Sawada; Yutaka Shimada; Shinichi Sekine; Kazuto Shibuya; Isaku Yoshioka; Koshi Matsui; Tomoyuki Okumura; Toru Yoshida; Takuya Nagata; Hideyuki Uotani; Kazuhiro Tsukada
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Xiaobo Bo; Erbao Chen; Jie Wang; Lingxi Nan; Yanlei Xin; Changchen Wang; Qing Lu; Shengxiang Rao; Lifang Pang; Min Li; Pinxiang Lu; Dexiang Zhang; Houbao Liu; Yueqi Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.