Literature DB >> 23622676

Conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in stable liver transplant patients: effectiveness in a real-world setting.

G Valente1, L Rinaldi, M Sgambato, G Piai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prolonged-release once-daily (QD) tacrolimus is a formulation developed to improve adherence to immunosuppressant (IS) regimen, reducing the frequency of dosing, and to increase safety, avoiding toxic peak concentrations. We evaluated efficiency and quality of conversion from twice-daily (BID) to QD tacrolimus formulation in stable liver transplant (LT) recipients in the real-setting of a gastrohepatology team peripheral to LT centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four LT recipients (median age 60 years, range 33-69) were switched from BID tacrolimus to QD tacrolimus (1:1 dose) at a median of 38 months (range 8-211) after transplantation. Tacrolimus levels and laboratory analyses were recorded before and postconversion. Adherence to IS treatment was measured by a modified "Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale to Immunosuppressives."
RESULTS: Median postconversion follow-up was 21 months (range 6-35, at least 12 months in 30 patients). Mean total tacrolimus daily dose and mean tacrolimus trough level were not significantly different before and after the switch (3.1 ± 2.3 preconversion versus 3.1 ± 2.5 and 3.0 ± 2.5 mg at 6 and 12 months postconversion, respectively; and 5.3 ± 1.8 preconversion versus 4.6 ± 1.4 and 4.5 ± 1.8 ng/mL at 6 and 12 months postconversion, respectively). All patients maintained stable liver and metabolic parameters. Renal function by glomerular filtration rate increased (67 ± 17 preconversion versus 73 ± 19 and 73 ± 20 mL/min at 6 and 12 months postconversion, respectively; P = .003). No acute rejection episode or major severe adverse events occurred postconversion. Patient-reported outcome showed a reduction of missed IS doses.
CONCLUSION: We observed that in a real-world setting far from LT centers, the switch from BID tacrolimus to QD tacrolimus in stable LT recipients is efficient (safe and effective) to improve quality of medical care, with possibly better IS adherence and improvement of renal function.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622676     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of prolonged-release versus immediate-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients in South Korea: a randomized open-label phase 4 study (MAPLE).

Authors:  Myoung Soo Kim; Jae-Won Joh; Dong-Sik Kim; Seoung Hoon Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Jaegeun Lee; Jee Youn Lee; Jong Man Kim; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Gyu-Seong Choi; Young Dong Yu; Yong-In Yoon; Jae Hyun Han; Yun Jeong Lee; Hongsi Jiang; Soon-Il Kim
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2019-06-30

2.  Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Relative to Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Patients Based on Data from Routine Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Gorden Muduma; Isaac Odeyemi; Richard Fulton Pollock
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2016-03

3.  Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Open-Label, Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase 4 Study.

Authors:  Eung Chang Lee; Seong Hoon Kim; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in the Metabolic Syndrome. A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Luca Rinaldi; Pia Clara Pafundi; Raffaele Galiero; Alfredo Caturano; Maria Vittoria Morone; Chiara Silvestri; Mauro Giordano; Teresa Salvatore; Ferdinando Carlo Sasso
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Cardiovascular disease risk in liver transplant recipients transplanted due to chronic viral hepatitis.

Authors:  Paolo Maggi; Federica Calò; Vincenzo Messina; Gianfranca Stornaiuolo; Maria Stanzione; Luca Rinaldi; Stefania De Pascalis; Margherita Macera; Nicola Coppola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A randomized cross-over comparison of short-term exposure of once-daily extended release tacrolimus and twice-daily tacrolimus on renal function in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Zaltzman; Vesta Lai; Miklos Z Schulz; Kyung-Hee Moon; David Z Cherney
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 7.  Update on the clinical utility of once-daily tacrolimus in the management of transplantation.

Authors:  Maria Aurora Posadas Salas; Titte R Srinivas
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Evaluation of the impact of Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression on Heidelberg liver transplant cohort (HDTACRO): Study protocol for an investigator initiated, non-interventional prospective study.

Authors:  Elias Khajeh; Georgios Polychronidis; Ali Ramouz; Parnian Alamdari; Anastasia Lemekhova; Melisa Saracevic; Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh; Omid Ghamarnejad; Ali Majlesara; Sepehr Abbasi Dezfouli; Arash Nickkholgh; Karl Heinz Weiss; Christian Rupp; Arianeb Mehrabi; Markus Mieth
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.