Literature DB >> 23622645

Intestinal and multivisceral retransplantation results: literature review.

A P Trevizol1, A I David, E T Yamashita, R A Pecora, L A D'Albuquerque.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intestinal/multivisceral transplantation (IT/MVT) is the gold standard treatment for patients with intestinal failure and complications related to total parenteral nutrition, gastrointestinal inoperable indolent tumors, or diffuse portal trombosis. Currently, the reported 1-year patient survival rate is around 80%, similar to other solid organ abdominal transplantations. Unfortunately, the patient survival decreases after the first year with the 5-year rate not close to 70% yet. Acute cellular rejection is the main cause of graft loss. Its early diagnosis may make it possible to improve survival of retransplantations.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the reported results published in the last 5 years by leading transplant centers to evaluate IT/MVT retransplantation results.
METHODS: We performed a literature review using PubMed focusing on multivisceral and intestinal retransplantation in articles published between 2006 and 2012. In relation to the first transplantation, we analyzed demographics, imunosuppression, rejection, infection as well as graft and patient survival rates.
RESULTS: Two centers reported results on intestinal and multivisceral retransplantations. Mazariegos et al reported their experience with 15 intestinal retransplantations in 14 pediatric recipients. Four patients died from posttransplant lymphoperliferative disease, severe acute cellular rejection, fungal sepsis, or bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm at a mean time of 5.7 months post-transplantation. Total parenteral nutrition was weaned at a median time of 32 days. Abu-Elmaged et al reported 47 cases with a 5-year survival of 47% for all retransplant modalities. Retransplantation with liver-contained visceral allograft achieved a 5-year survival rate of 61% compared with 16% for liver-free visceral grafts.
CONCLUSION: Despite those huge improvements, some transplanted patients develop severe acute cellular rejection, culminating in graft loss and retransplantation. Repots on multivisceral and intestinal retransplantation outcomes suggest that it is a viable procedure with appropriate patient survival after primary graft loss.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622645     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal organoids: roadmap to the clinic.

Authors:  Magdalena Kasendra; Misty Troutt; Taylor Broda; W Clark Bacon; Timothy C Wang; Joyce C Niland; Michael A Helmrath
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.871

2.  Effect of CXCR3/HO-1 genes modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on small bowel transplant rejection.

Authors:  Ming-Li Yin; Hong-Li Song; Yang Yang; Wei-Ping Zheng; Tao Liu; Zhong-Yang Shen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Effects of infection on post-transplant outcomes: living versus deceased donor liver transplants.

Authors:  Osama Siddique; Ayesha S Siddique; Jason T Machan; Kittichai Promrat
Journal:  Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-01-31

4.  Challenges with Intestine and Multivisceral Re-Transplantation: Importance of Timing of Re-Transplantation and Optimal Immunosuppression.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar A Kubal; Catherine Pennington; Jonathan Fridell; Burcin Ekser; Plamen Muhaylov; Richard Mangus
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.