Literature DB >> 23622609

Anesthesia for ventricular assist device placement: experience from a single center.

S Kocabas1, F Z Askar, T Yagdi, C Engin, M Ozbaran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circulatory support with ventricular assist systems has become a treatment alternative for patients with end-stage heart failure owing to the donor shortage. In this report, we have presented our institution's clinical experience in the anesthetic management of ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation.
METHODS: Between April 2007 and August 2012, VAD implantation was performed in 84 adult patients with end-stage heart failure. The group included 75 male and 9 female patients of overall mean age, 47.6 ± 13.4 years. Our retrospective review analyzed elements of perioperative anesthetic care, including preoperative characteristics, general anesthetic care, and blood product usage.
RESULTS: The indications for VAD implantation were dilated (n = 59; 70%) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 25; 30%). An intra-aortic balloon pump had been placed in 16 patients. We monitored invasive arterial and central venous pressures as well as intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Etomidate was used as the induction agent in 79 of 84 patients (average dose, 18.75 ± 1.40 mg). Intraoperative fentanyl dose was 939.69 ± 212.44 μg. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (n = 55) or desflurane (n = 29). Dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and levosimendan were used in 74, 79, 60, 14, and 32 patients, respectively. Inhaled nitric oxide was administered to 38 subjects (45%). The amounts of perioperative blood, fresh frozen plasma, and thrombocyte suspension transfusions were 3.96 ± 2.78, 1.91 ± 1.21, 1.80 ± 2.48 u, respectively. On average, patients were extubated 13 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit and discharged therefrom on day 8. Thirty-one patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. While 27 patients (32%) died during the follow-up period, 26 are still living on VAD support.
CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing VAD implantation, the anesthesiologist should become familiar with the device and consider the severity of cardiac and other end-organ dysfunction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622609     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular assist devices and non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  S Michael Roberts; David G Hovord; Ramesh Kodavatiganti; Subramanian Sathishkumar
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  A case of laparotomic cholecystectomy in a patient with biventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Kenta Okitsu; Takeshi Iritakenishi; Chiyo Ootaki; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2017-02-07

3.  2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  Facilitating noncardiac surgery for the patient with left ventricular assist device: A guide for the anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Kai-Yin Hwang; Nian-Chih Hwang
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.