Literature DB >> 23622477

Experimental penetration of fragment simulating projectiles into porcine tissues compared with simulants.

J Breeze1, N Hunt, I Gibb, G James, A Hepper, J Clasper.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ballistic gelatin is well validated in its ability to simulate the retardation of bullets into homogenous muscle. However the relationship is less clear for fragmentation projectiles and non-homogenous tissues as would truly be found in a human.
METHOD: 0.16 g, 1.10 g and 2.84 g NATO standardised cylindrical Fragment Simulating Projectiles (FSPs) were fired at a range of velocities (112-1652 m s(-1)) into four body areas (thigh, abdomen, thorax or neck) of six pig cadavers as well as 20% gelatin. Cadavers were imaged by Computed Tomography (CT) scanning and FSP Depth of Penetration (DoP) ascertained through radiology followed by dissection by a forensic pathologist.
RESULTS: 106/149 (71%) FSPs were retained in tissues enabling DoP measurements and 43/149 (29%) exited the subjects. There was significantly less retardation of FSPs in the thorax and abdomen compared to gelatin but no difference in retardation in leg and neck tissue compared to gelatin. Although the gradient appeared identical for the 2.84 g FSP as well, there were insufficient FSPs retained in the neck and leg for meaningful analysis to be undertaken. DISCUSSION: Porcine leg and neck muscle was demonstrated to be comparable to 20% ballistic gelatin in terms of retardation, validating the use of projectile penetration algorithms derived from this tissue simulant. The effect of pig skin was significant for the 0.16 g FSP, especially at lower velocities, and we would therefore suggest that specific algorithms for any future numerical injury models be based directly from animal data or validated skin simulants for this smaller sized FSP. Reproducing the retardation effects of FSPs in the thorax and abdomen using tissue simulants alone will be problematic due to the anatomical complexity as well as multiple tissue-air interfaces and we would recommend further research in this area. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622477     DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med        ISSN: 1752-928X            Impact factor:   1.614


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Simulator model for ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis : Construction manual and practical evaluation].

Authors:  M N Bergold; H Beeck; D Meininger; C Byhahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Gelatine Backing Affects the Performance of Single-Layer Ballistic-Resistant Materials Against Blast Fragments.

Authors:  Thuy-Tien N Nguyen; George Meek; John Breeze; Spyros D Masouros
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-02

3.  Effectiveness of novel fabrics to resist punctures and lacerations from white shark (Carcharodon carcharias): Implications to reduce injuries from shark bites.

Authors:  Sasha K Whitmarsh; Dhara B Amin; John J Costi; Joshua D Dennis; Charlie Huveneers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The ballistic performance of bone when impacted by fragments.

Authors:  A J Caister; D J Carr; P D Campbell; F Brock; J Breeze
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Study on the Similarity of Biomechanical Behavior between Gelatin and Porcine Liver.

Authors:  Jiyun Zhao; Chao Cao; Guilin Li; Liuyin Chao; Haigang Ding; Yufeng Yao; Liangchen Song; Xin Jin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies.

Authors:  A Mabbott; D J Carr; S Champion; C Malbon
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.686

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.