PURPOSE: To identify barriers to ophthalmological follow-up in high-risk children who are identified by vision screening and eye examination. METHODS: The records of patients identified as needing follow-up through two free eye care programs (organized optometric and ophthalmologic screening sessions aimed at identifying and treating ocular pathology) targeted toward inner-city youths of low socioeconomic status were reviewed. Parents were contacted by phone, and a questionnaire on barriers to follow-up was administered. Callers attempted to schedule appointments at that time. Data were assessed by means of descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 54 (58%), were successfully contacted. Of these, 23 (25%) were eventually scheduled. Five (5%) patients elected follow-up elsewhere. Twenty (22%) with working phones were still unable to be scheduled. Additional obstacles included families' lack of awareness of the need for follow-up (13%), assumption by families that they would be contacted (5%), scheduling conflicts (4%), concerns about insurance, and difficulty finalizing referrals (2%). A total of 39 patients (42%) were not successfully contacted because of inoperable phone services, and none of the families responded to the mailed questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Inability to contact families was the greatest barrier to follow-up. Our findings suggest that immediate arrangement of follow-up care, on-site visual assessment, and a program director may be useful in increasing follow-up for high-risk children.
PURPOSE: To identify barriers to ophthalmological follow-up in high-risk children who are identified by vision screening and eye examination. METHODS: The records of patients identified as needing follow-up through two free eye care programs (organized optometric and ophthalmologic screening sessions aimed at identifying and treating ocular pathology) targeted toward inner-city youths of low socioeconomic status were reviewed. Parents were contacted by phone, and a questionnaire on barriers to follow-up was administered. Callers attempted to schedule appointments at that time. Data were assessed by means of descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 54 (58%), were successfully contacted. Of these, 23 (25%) were eventually scheduled. Five (5%) patients elected follow-up elsewhere. Twenty (22%) with working phones were still unable to be scheduled. Additional obstacles included families' lack of awareness of the need for follow-up (13%), assumption by families that they would be contacted (5%), scheduling conflicts (4%), concerns about insurance, and difficulty finalizing referrals (2%). A total of 39 patients (42%) were not successfully contacted because of inoperable phone services, and none of the families responded to the mailed questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Inability to contact families was the greatest barrier to follow-up. Our findings suggest that immediate arrangement of follow-up care, on-site visual assessment, and a program director may be useful in increasing follow-up for high-risk children.
Authors: Alexandra N Zdonczyk; Gaurang Gupte; Anna Schroeder; Varsha Sathappan; Andrew R Lee; Susan M Culican Journal: J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 1.330