AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new intervention to improve work participation of young adults with physical disabilities, addressing (1) implementation and costs and (2) preliminary effectiveness. METHOD: Twelve young adults with physical disabilities (six males, six females; age 19-28 y, median age 21 y 6 mo) participated in a 1-year multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation intervention. In a pre-post intervention design, we assessed implementation and costs as well as preliminary effectiveness in terms of employment and occupational performance using questionnaires and interviews. We tested pre-post differences with the McNemar test for proportions and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for scores on occupational performance; p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Additionally, we assessed work participation at follow-up after 2 years and 3 years. RESULTS: The intervention was implemented in an outpatient rehabilitation clinic for young adults. The median cost per participant for 1 year was €3128, which is an equivalent to the cost of 72 contact hours per participant. Post intervention, and at 2 years and 3 years follow-up, a significantly higher proportion of participants were employed (8/12 post vs 2/12 pre-intervention; p<0.05), with the ratio of those in paid to unpaid employment being 4:4, 5:3, and 7:1 respectively. Participants showed improved occupational performance in work, self-care, and leisure. INTERPRETATION: Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention are promising. Employed participants seemed to have achieved suitable and continuous employment.
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new intervention to improve work participation of young adults with physical disabilities, addressing (1) implementation and costs and (2) preliminary effectiveness. METHOD: Twelve young adults with physical disabilities (six males, six females; age 19-28 y, median age 21 y 6 mo) participated in a 1-year multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation intervention. In a pre-post intervention design, we assessed implementation and costs as well as preliminary effectiveness in terms of employment and occupational performance using questionnaires and interviews. We tested pre-post differences with the McNemar test for proportions and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for scores on occupational performance; p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Additionally, we assessed work participation at follow-up after 2 years and 3 years. RESULTS: The intervention was implemented in an outpatient rehabilitation clinic for young adults. The median cost per participant for 1 year was €3128, which is an equivalent to the cost of 72 contact hours per participant. Post intervention, and at 2 years and 3 years follow-up, a significantly higher proportion of participants were employed (8/12 post vs 2/12 pre-intervention; p<0.05), with the ratio of those in paid to unpaid employment being 4:4, 5:3, and 7:1 respectively. Participants showed improved occupational performance in work, self-care, and leisure. INTERPRETATION: Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention are promising. Employed participants seemed to have achieved suitable and continuous employment.
Authors: Joan A C Verhoef; Marij E Roebroeck; Natascha van Schaardenburgh; Monique C S G Floothuis; Harald S Miedema Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2014-03
Authors: Holly L Peay; Barbara T Do; Neil Khosla; Pangaja Paramsothy; Stephen W Erickson; Molly M Lamb; Nedra Whitehead; Deborah J Fox; Shree Pandya; Kathi Kinnett; Jodi Wolff; James F Howard Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis Date: 2022