BACKGROUND:Recombinant allergens offer a tool for improving specific immunotherapy (SIT). OBJECTIVE: To find the optimal dose of a new hypoallergenic folding variant of recombinant Bet v 1 (rBet v 1-FV) as SIT for patients with birch pollen allergy. METHODS:Before SIT, thirty-seven adult patients were exposed for eight hours in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) to birch pollen at an average concentration of 3500 ± 500 grains/m(3) , then randomized to four maintenance dose groups of rBet v 1-FV and one placebogroup: 20 μg (n = 7), 80 μg (n = 8), 160 μg (n = 7), 320 μg (n = 8), and placebo (n = 7). Patients were treated for 10 weeks with weekly injections and then re-exposed in the EEC. The optimal dose for SIT was assessed using efficacy results from the EEC, IgG responses, and tolerability. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. The total symptom score significantly decreased in all active groups compared with placebo (-18.8% for placebo patients; -71.9%, P = 0.0022 for 20 μg; -75.6%, P = 0.0007 for 80 μg; -81.8%, P = 0.0009 for 160 μg; -78.3%, P = 0.0003 for 320 μg). IgG1 increased significantly in all active groups compared to placebo. All four active doses were well tolerated, no serious adverse event occurred; two Grade II reactions, according to EAACI classification, were observed, one in each of the 160- and 320-μg groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering efficacy, immunological response, and tolerability, a maintenance dose of 80 μg of rBet v 1-FV appears to be the ideal dose for allergen immunotherapy in birch pollen allergic patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recombinant allergens offer a tool for improving specific immunotherapy (SIT). OBJECTIVE: To find the optimal dose of a new hypoallergenic folding variant of recombinant Bet v 1 (rBet v 1-FV) as SIT for patients with birch pollen allergy. METHODS: Before SIT, thirty-seven adult patients were exposed for eight hours in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) to birch pollen at an average concentration of 3500 ± 500 grains/m(3) , then randomized to four maintenance dose groups of rBet v 1-FV and one placebo group: 20 μg (n = 7), 80 μg (n = 8), 160 μg (n = 7), 320 μg (n = 8), and placebo (n = 7). Patients were treated for 10 weeks with weekly injections and then re-exposed in the EEC. The optimal dose for SIT was assessed using efficacy results from the EEC, IgG responses, and tolerability. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. The total symptom score significantly decreased in all active groups compared with placebo (-18.8% for placebo patients; -71.9%, P = 0.0022 for 20 μg; -75.6%, P = 0.0007 for 80 μg; -81.8%, P = 0.0009 for 160 μg; -78.3%, P = 0.0003 for 320 μg). IgG1 increased significantly in all active groups compared to placebo. All four active doses were well tolerated, no serious adverse event occurred; two Grade II reactions, according to EAACI classification, were observed, one in each of the 160- and 320-μg groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering efficacy, immunological response, and tolerability, a maintenance dose of 80 μg of rBet v 1-FV appears to be the ideal dose for allergen immunotherapy in birch pollen allergicpatients.
Authors: Carlos Gamazo; Carmen D'Amelio; Gabriel Gastaminza; Marta Ferrer; Juan M Irache Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Anna Pomés; Maksymilian Chruszcz; Alla Gustchina; Wladek Minor; Geoffrey A Mueller; Lars C Pedersen; Alexander Wlodawer; Martin D Chapman Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Felix Husslik; Kay-Martin Hanschmann; Ariane Krämer; Christian Seutter von Loetzen; Kristian Schweimer; Iris Bellinghausen; Regina Treudler; Jan C Simon; Lothar Vogel; Elke Völker; Stefanie Randow; Andreas Reuter; Paul Rösch; Stefan Vieths; Thomas Holzhauser; Dirk Schiller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240