OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the influence of virological response (VR) to entecavir on clinical liver disease progression in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive and -experienced patients. METHODS: We investigated 487 chronic hepatitis B patients (323 NA-naive, 164 NA-experienced) treated with entecavir monotherapy for at least 12 months. VR was defined as hepatitis B virus DNA level <300 copies/mL during entecavir therapy. Clinical events were defined as hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), death and liver transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 487 patients, 49 developed clinical events during entecavir treatment. Of those, 36 developed HCC. For all patients, Cox regression analysis showed that age, baseline cirrhosis, alanine aminotransferase level ≤200 U/L, albumin level and no VR during entecavir treatment were independent predictors for clinical events and HCC development. However, the benefit of VR to entecavir was significant for clinical events and HCC only in NA-experienced patients, but not in NA-naive patients. For the further analysis of the different subgroups of NA-experienced patients, the benefit of VR to entecavir was significant for clinical events or HCC only in patients with prior lamivudine- or adefovir-resistant mutants, but not in NA-experienced patients who had never developed lamivudine- or adefovir-resistant mutants. VR at month 12 (but not early VR at month 6) remained a significant predictor associated with the development of clinical events and HCC in NA-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: VR to entecavir was associated with a reduced risk of clinical events and HCC in NA-experienced patients, particularly in those who had prior lamivudine- or adefovir-resistant mutants.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the influence of virological response (VR) to entecavir on clinical liver disease progression in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive and -experienced patients. METHODS: We investigated 487 chronic hepatitis Bpatients (323 NA-naive, 164 NA-experienced) treated with entecavir monotherapy for at least 12 months. VR was defined as hepatitis B virus DNA level <300 copies/mL during entecavir therapy. Clinical events were defined as hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), death and liver transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 487 patients, 49 developed clinical events during entecavir treatment. Of those, 36 developed HCC. For all patients, Cox regression analysis showed that age, baseline cirrhosis, alanine aminotransferase level ≤200 U/L, albumin level and no VR during entecavir treatment were independent predictors for clinical events and HCC development. However, the benefit of VR to entecavir was significant for clinical events and HCC only in NA-experienced patients, but not in NA-naive patients. For the further analysis of the different subgroups of NA-experienced patients, the benefit of VR to entecavir was significant for clinical events or HCC only in patients with prior lamivudine- or adefovir-resistant mutants, but not in NA-experienced patients who had never developed lamivudine- or adefovir-resistant mutants. VR at month 12 (but not early VR at month 6) remained a significant predictor associated with the development of clinical events and HCC in NA-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: VR to entecavir was associated with a reduced risk of clinical events and HCC in NA-experienced patients, particularly in those who had prior lamivudine- or adefovir-resistant mutants.
Entities:
Keywords:
hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; lamivudine
Authors: Joseph Ahn; Joseph K Lim; Hannah M Lee; Anna S Lok; Mindie Nguyen; Calvin Q Pan; Ajitha Mannalithara; Helen Te; K Rajender Reddy; Huy Trinh; Danny Chu; Tram Tran; Daryl Lau; Truong-Sinh Leduc; Albert Min; Loc Trong Le; Ho Bae; Sang Van Tran; Son Do; Hie-Won L Hann; Clifford Wong; Steven Han; Anjana Pillai; James S Park; Myron Tong; Steve Scaglione; Jocelyn Woog; W Ray Kim Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Scott Bowden; Stephen Locarnini; Ting-Tsung Chang; You-Chen Chao; Kwang-Hyub Han; Robert G Gish; Robert A de Man; Miao Yu; Cyril Llamoso; Hong Tang Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: S K Sarin; M Kumar; G K Lau; Z Abbas; H L Y Chan; C J Chen; D S Chen; H L Chen; P J Chen; R N Chien; A K Dokmeci; Ed Gane; J L Hou; W Jafri; J Jia; J H Kim; C L Lai; H C Lee; S G Lim; C J Liu; S Locarnini; M Al Mahtab; R Mohamed; M Omata; J Park; T Piratvisuth; B C Sharma; J Sollano; F S Wang; L Wei; M F Yuen; S S Zheng; J H Kao Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 6.047
Authors: Yu Jung Jo; Kyung-Ah Kim; June Sung Lee; Nam-Hoon Kim; Won Ki Bae; Tae June Song; Jeong Wook Kim Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 2.884
Authors: Do Young Kim; Ju Hyun Kim; Won Young Tak; Jong Eun Yeon; Joon Hyeok Lee; Jung Hwan Yoon; Youn Jae Lee; Byung Seok Lee; Byung Hoon Han; Han Chu Lee Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 4.162