Literature DB >> 23620366

Elasmobranch cognitive ability: using electroreceptive foraging behaviour to demonstrate learning, habituation and memory in a benthic shark.

Joel A Kimber1, David W Sims, Patricia H Bellamy, Andrew B Gill.   

Abstract

Top predators inhabiting a dynamic environment, such as coastal waters, should theoretically possess sufficient cognitive ability to allow successful foraging despite unpredictable sensory stimuli. The cognition-related hunting abilities of marine mammals have been widely demonstrated. Having been historically underestimated, teleost cognitive abilities have also now been significantly demonstrated. Conversely, the abilities of elasmobranchs have received little attention, despite many species possessing relatively large brains comparable to some mammals. The need to determine what, if any, cognitive ability these globally distributed, apex predators are endowed with has been highlighted recently by questions arising from environmental assessments, specifically whether they are able to learn to distinguish between anthropogenic electric fields and prey bioelectric fields. We therefore used electroreceptive foraging behaviour in a model species, Scyliorhinus canicula (small-spotted catshark), to determine cognitive ability by analysing whether elasmobranchs are able to learn to improve foraging efficiency and remember learned behavioural adaptations. Positive reinforcement, operant conditioning was used to study catshark foraging behaviour towards artificial, prey-type electric fields (Efields). Catsharks rewarded with food for responding to Efields throughout experimental weeks were compared with catsharks that were not rewarded for responding in order to assess behavioural adaptation via learning ability. Experiments were repeated after a 3-week interval with previously rewarded catsharks this time receiving no reward and vice versa to assess memory ability. Positive reinforcement markedly and rapidly altered catshark foraging behaviour. Rewarded catsharks exhibited significantly more interest in the electrical stimulus than unrewarded catsharks. Furthermore, they improved their foraging efficiency over time by learning to locate and bite the electrodes to gain food more quickly. In contrast, unrewarded catsharks showed some habituation, whereby their responses to the electrodes abated and eventually entirely ceased, though they generally showed no changes in most foraging parameters. Behavioural adaptations were not retained after the interval suggesting learned behaviour was not memorised beyond the interval. Sequences of individual catshark search paths clearly illustrated learning and habituation behavioural adaptation. This study demonstrated learning and habituation occurring after few foraging events and a memory window of between 12 h and 3 weeks. These cognitive abilities are discussed in relation to diet, habitat, ecology and anthropogenic Efield sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23620366     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0637-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  6 in total

1.  The brain creates illusions not just for us: sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can "see the magic" as well.

Authors:  Theodora Fuss; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  In-water observations highlight the effects of provisioning on whale shark behaviour at the world's largest whale shark tourism destination.

Authors:  Christine Legaspi; Joni Miranda; Jessica Labaja; Sally Snow; Alessandro Ponzo; Gonzalo Araujo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Acoustic discrimination in the grey bamboo shark Chiloscyllium griseum.

Authors:  Tamar Poppelier; Jana Bonsberger; Boris Woody Berkhout; Reneé Pollmanns; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Habituation in anuran tadpoles and the role of risk uncertainty.

Authors:  Mariana Pueta; Dolores Ardanaz; Juan Cruz Tallone
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  How Close is too Close? The Effect of a Non-Lethal Electric Shark Deterrent on White Shark Behaviour.

Authors:  Ryan M Kempster; Channing A Egeberg; Nathan S Hart; Laura Ryan; Lucille Chapuis; Caroline C Kerr; Carl Schmidt; Charlie Huveneers; Enrico Gennari; Kara E Yopak; Jessica J Meeuwig; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Variable response to electric shark deterrents in bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas.

Authors:  A R G Gauthier; E Chateauminois; M G Hoarau; J Gadenne; E Hoarau; S Jaquemet; S K Whitmarsh; C Huveneers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.