AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Alginate-encapsulated human islet cell grafts have not been able to correct diabetes in humans, whereas free grafts have. This study examined in immunodeficient mice whether alginate-encapsulated graft function was inferior to that of free grafts of the same size and composition. METHODS: Cultured human islet cells were equally distributed over free and alginate-encapsulated grafts before implantation in, respectively, the kidney capsule and the peritoneal cavity of non-obese diabetic mice with severe combined immunodeficiency and alloxan-induced diabetes. Implants were followed for in vivo function and retrieved for analysis of cellular composition (all) and insulin secretory responsiveness (capsules). RESULTS: Free implants with low beta cell purity (19 ± 1%) were non-functional and underwent 90% beta cell loss. At medium purity (50 ± 1%), they were functional at post-transplant week 1, evolving to normoglycaemia (4/8) or to C-peptide negativity (4/8) depending on the degree of beta cell-specific losses. Encapsulated implants immediately and sustainably corrected diabetes, irrespective of beta cell purity (16/16). Most capsules were retrievable as single units, enriched in endocrine cells that exhibited rapid secretory responses to glucose and glucagon. Single capsules with similar properties were also retrieved from a type 1 diabetic recipient at post-transplant month 3. However, the vast majority were clustered and contained debris, explaining the poor rise in plasma C-peptide. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In immunodeficient mice, i.p. implanted alginate-encapsulated human islet cells exhibited a better outcome than free implants under the kidney capsule. They did not show primary non-function at low beta cell purity and avoided beta cell-specific losses by rapidly establishing normoglycaemia. Retrieved capsules presented secretory responses to glucose, which was also observed in a type 1 diabetic recipient.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Alginate-encapsulated human islet cell grafts have not been able to correct diabetes in humans, whereas free grafts have. This study examined in immunodeficientmice whether alginate-encapsulated graft function was inferior to that of free grafts of the same size and composition. METHODS: Cultured human islet cells were equally distributed over free and alginate-encapsulated grafts before implantation in, respectively, the kidney capsule and the peritoneal cavity of non-obese diabeticmice with severe combined immunodeficiency and alloxan-induced diabetes. Implants were followed for in vivo function and retrieved for analysis of cellular composition (all) and insulin secretory responsiveness (capsules). RESULTS: Free implants with low beta cell purity (19 ± 1%) were non-functional and underwent 90% beta cell loss. At medium purity (50 ± 1%), they were functional at post-transplant week 1, evolving to normoglycaemia (4/8) or to C-peptide negativity (4/8) depending on the degree of beta cell-specific losses. Encapsulated implants immediately and sustainably corrected diabetes, irrespective of beta cell purity (16/16). Most capsules were retrievable as single units, enriched in endocrine cells that exhibited rapid secretory responses to glucose and glucagon. Single capsules with similar properties were also retrieved from a type 1 diabetic recipient at post-transplant month 3. However, the vast majority were clustered and contained debris, explaining the poor rise in plasma C-peptide. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In immunodeficientmice, i.p. implanted alginate-encapsulated human islet cells exhibited a better outcome than free implants under the kidney capsule. They did not show primary non-function at low beta cell purity and avoided beta cell-specific losses by rapidly establishing normoglycaemia. Retrieved capsules presented secretory responses to glucose, which was also observed in a type 1 diabetic recipient.
Authors: Abdulkadir Omer; Valerie Duvivier-Kali; Justin Fernandes; Vaja Tchipashvili; Clark K Colton; Gordon C Weir Journal: Transplantation Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Stephan Schneider; Peter J Feilen; Frank Brunnenmeier; Timo Minnemann; Heiko Zimmermann; Ulrich Zimmermann; Matthias M Weber Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Taylor Wang; Jamie Adcock; Willem Kühtreiber; Deng Qiang; Kenneth J Salleng; Irina Trenary; Phil Williams Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: P Soon-Shiong; E Feldman; R Nelson; R Heintz; Q Yao; Z Yao; T Zheng; N Merideth; G Skjak-Braek; T Espevik Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1993-06-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Virginia Spanoudaki; Joshua C Doloff; Wei Huang; Samuel R Norcross; Shady Farah; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Duo An; Alan Chiu; James A Flanders; Wei Song; Dahua Shou; Yen-Chun Lu; Lars G Grunnet; Louise Winkel; Camilla Ingvorsen; Nicolaj Strøyer Christophersen; Johannes Josef Fels; Fredrik Wolfhagen Sand; Yewei Ji; Ling Qi; Yehudah Pardo; Dan Luo; Meredith Silberstein; Jintu Fan; Minglin Ma Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 11.205